CNN refuses to show France's Charlie Hebdo magazine cover

[Ravi]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Good question. There is a poster here, mac something or other, that claimed the protestors and the mayor of NYC were responsible for the killing of those NYC cops.

Then he bends over backwards to defend some stupid cartoons.

 

[g5000]

The airwaves have been filled with Muslims condemning these attacks.

I do not watch Fox News. Have they aired any Muslims condemning these attacks? Or are they going to wait a few months and do the same shit they always do; ask their rube audience, "Where are the Muslims condemning these attacks?" Or maybe they will go out and find some shithead Muslim with radical views and see if they can get him to say something inflammatory, with the implication that is how a majority of Muslims think.

The ones condemning these acts are everywhere. You know...if you LOOK.


Muslim Leaders Speak Out Against Paris Attack

What does any of that have to do with CNN not showing the cover of the Charlie Hebdo magazine?

It's the same thing. Self-censorship.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The airwaves have been filled with Muslims condemning these attacks.

I do not watch Fox News. Have they aired any Muslims condemning these attacks? Or are they going to wait a few months and do the same shit they always do; ask their rube audience, "Where are the Muslims condemning these attacks?" Or maybe they will go out and find some shithead Muslim with radical views and see if they can get him to say something inflammatory, with the implication that is how a majority of Muslims think.

The ones condemning these acts are everywhere. You know...if you LOOK.


Muslim Leaders Speak Out Against Paris Attack

FOX didn't wait a couple of months. They've been saying where are the muslims condemning this act since it happened.

This line of attack around blaming moderate Muslims for not condemning the extremists enough is an extremely sophisticated (in an evil way) propaganda tactic.

Innocent Muslims have NO obligation to trumpet their disapproval of the terrorists. They CANNOT be held responsible for insufficient condemnation;

their innocence makes them innocent. Period.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Good question. There is a poster here, mac something or other, that claimed the protestors and the mayor of NYC were responsible for the killing of those NYC cops.

Then he bends over backwards to defend some stupid cartoons.

Right. I was personally accused, by Mac1958, of being responsible for the cops being killed because I objected to Garner being killed.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Basically they are saying that Muslims are emotional killers and I'm really surprised that you aren't on their side.

That cartoon is actually a good one. Pure satire that makes a point without showing Mo getting fucked up the ass or some other juvie idiocy.

Basically they kissed up... CNN cited a concern over "sensitivity of Muslim audiences".

If they cited concern over "the strong possibility some Mulsims might will kill someone over the picture" I would agree.

Which is why I dont understand why people are saying its brave to print it. CNN has a lot of overseas people on the air and its a target.

No it shouldnt be one but reality dont care

Just admit that the jihadists have won and walk away.

Winning and Losing? Cant get dumber than that

 

[The Rabbi]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

 

[The Rabbi]

Muslims in France are doing about the minimum to appease authorities.
This is because for every Muslim who shoots an unarmed person there are probably 10 who knew about his plans and didnt report him or try to stop him.
For every one person who knew, there are probably 100 Muslims who think the act was defensible and just.
For every one who thought it was just there are probably 100 who really dont care very much.

 

[ogibillm]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

what's the difference?

 

[bodecea]

Muslims in France are doing about the minimum to appease authorities.
This is because for every Muslim who shoots an unarmed person there are probably 10 who knew about his plans and didnt report him or try to stop him.
For every one person who knew, there are probably 100 Muslims who think the act was defensible and just.
For every one who thought it was just there are probably 100 who really dont care very much.

You've got some facts to back up those stats, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

What are you denying? Are you denying that the mockery of Muhammed caused the violence in France?

Or are you conceding that you and your pals were full of shit to try to blame the cop killing on protests?

 

[HenryBHough]

Someone is surprised at CNN sucking up to the terrorist element?

I mean, really surprised?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Someone is surprised at CNN sucking up to the terrorist element?

I mean, really surprised?

What part of not offending the religion of another bothers you?

 

[FA_Q2]

Someone is surprised at CNN sucking up to the terrorist element?

I mean, really surprised?

What part of not offending the religion of another bothers you?

The part that stifles free speech with murder. Or did you not notice the fact that offending religions is not something CNN cares about until the terrorists get upset.

 

[The Rabbi]

Muslims in France are doing about the minimum to appease authorities.
This is because for every Muslim who shoots an unarmed person there are probably 10 who knew about his plans and didnt report him or try to stop him.
For every one person who knew, there are probably 100 Muslims who think the act was defensible and just.
For every one who thought it was just there are probably 100 who really dont care very much.

You've got some facts to back up those stats, right?

When do yo care about facts? The truth is Muslims in Paris have rioted, robbed, looted and burned consistently over the past several years and their community has never come out and condemned it outright.

 

[HenryBHough]

Feigned surprise ill becomes one who crawls about vandalizing prostitutes with shop-lifted cans of spray enamel.

 

[The Rabbi]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

What are you denying? Are you denying that the mockery of Muhammed caused the violence in France?

Or are you conceding that you and your pals were full of shit to try to blame the cop killing on protests?

The Muhammed cartoons did not cause the violence. Muslims caused the violence.
Similarly nut jobs here killed cops in NYC, but they were encouraged and aided by irresponsible statements by many on the Left including the response of the administration.

 

[The Rabbi]

Someone is surprised at CNN sucking up to the terrorist element?

I mean, really surprised?

CNN has been the most anti Israel of news outlets so no shock their concered with "Muslim sensibilities."
Frankly when a mainstream news org self censors out of fear like that then the goat-fuckers have won.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

What are you denying? Are you denying that the mockery of Muhammed caused the violence in France?

Or are you conceding that you and your pals were full of shit to try to blame the cop killing on protests?

The Muhammed cartoons did not cause the violence. Muslims caused the violence.
Similarly nut jobs here killed cops in NYC, but they were encouraged and aided by irresponsible statements by many on the Left including the response of the administration.

Classic double standard. You're too easy, nimrod. You're a fucking child (with all due respect to good children).

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why aren't the offensive anti-Muhammed cartoons considered incitement by you people who considered the Eric Garner protests incitement?

Huh? False moral equivalency coupled with straw man fallacy.

What are you denying? Are you denying that the mockery of Muhammed caused the violence in France?

Or are you conceding that you and your pals were full of shit to try to blame the cop killing on protests?

The Muhammed cartoons did not cause the violence.

No, the cartoons didn't cause the violence even though the killers themselves said the cartoons caused the violence.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Someone is surprised at CNN sucking up to the terrorist element?

I mean, really surprised?

What part of not offending the religion of another bothers you?

The part that stifles free speech with murder. Or did you not notice the fact that offending religions is not something CNN cares about until the terrorists get upset.

Well it makes sense not to offend those who might kill you eh? Are you suggesting that not taking offense or killing people would be an even better idea? I couldn't agree more.