CNN Fact Checks Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders. It Gets Ugly, Fast.

I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
/——/ The MSM does not support the New Democrat Socialist movement. They will try to take her out.
 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
/——/ The MSM does not support the New Democrat Socialist movement. They will try to take her out.

More likely they will use her then kick her to the curb after.
 
The worst by far is Fox. One wonders if being stupid isn't a requirement for working there?

Trish Regan - Jesus what a bubble-headed bleach blonde
PS: Being stupid is indeed a requirement to work there unless you are Shep Smith or Chris Wallace :)

We got the bubble-headed-bleach-blond
Who comes on at five
She can tell you 'bout the plane crash with a gleam in her eye
It's interesting when people die
Give us dirty laundry

 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

Well, this is the way politics is going now. Say something get noticed, fact? Who cares?
CNN and other DNCMSM news outlets fact check Donnie every day and often call him a liar. They seldom if ever did this to BO. Clearly they are a partisan entity.

Don’t get me wrong. I much prefer their approach today versus they sycophantic love for BO. BO got away with way too many corrupt actions and lies, because the MSM failed to do their job.

Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?

Yep, and even the NTY and WaPo have regular conservative op-ed contributors.
 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
we need to keep it simple, so people will embrace socialism.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs.

Junk Bonds, not Junk Laws!

A positive multiplier does the rest.

Grow our economy, we Must.
 
Well, this is the way politics is going now. Say something get noticed, fact? Who cares?
CNN and other DNCMSM news outlets fact check Donnie every day and often call him a liar. They seldom if ever did this to BO. Clearly they are a partisan entity.

Don’t get me wrong. I much prefer their approach today versus they sycophantic love for BO. BO got away with way too many corrupt actions and lies, because the MSM failed to do their job.

Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?

Yep, and even the NTY and WaPo have regular conservative op-ed contributors.
I think Sanders is a better candidate for any political office over Cortez, Biden, Warren, Pelosi, Hoyer, Durbin and Hillary.
That is not saying a hell of a lot.

Very true!
 
Well, this is the way politics is going now. Say something get noticed, fact? Who cares?
CNN and other DNCMSM news outlets fact check Donnie every day and often call him a liar. They seldom if ever did this to BO. Clearly they are a partisan entity.

Don’t get me wrong. I much prefer their approach today versus they sycophantic love for BO. BO got away with way too many corrupt actions and lies, because the MSM failed to do their job.

Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?

Yep, and even the NTY and WaPo have regular conservative op-ed contributors.

So does Fox, big deal, the outlets are what they are, they are all biased and heavily so.
 
what's not to love about socialism when,

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs;

so People can afford to embrace and get social, under our form of Capitalism.
 
CNN and other DNCMSM news outlets fact check Donnie every day and often call him a liar. They seldom if ever did this to BO. Clearly they are a partisan entity.

Don’t get me wrong. I much prefer their approach today versus they sycophantic love for BO. BO got away with way too many corrupt actions and lies, because the MSM failed to do their job.

Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?

Yep, and even the NTY and WaPo have regular conservative op-ed contributors.

So does Fox, big deal, the outlets are what they are, they are all biased and heavily so.

Nonsense - other than a couple of token and not-so-bright "lefties" like Bob "Dry Drunk" Bechtel and Juan Williams, they engage in the occasional 4 on 1 shutdown and CUT HIS MIC/ SHUTUP!!! operation.

 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

Well, this is the way politics is going now. Say something get noticed, fact? Who cares?
CNN and other DNCMSM news outlets fact check Donnie every day and often call him a liar. They seldom if ever did this to BO. Clearly they are a partisan entity.

Don’t get me wrong. I much prefer their approach today versus they sycophantic love for BO. BO got away with way too many corrupt actions and lies, because the MSM failed to do their job.

Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?


In the past it has always been the liberal media calling conservative media fake news and promoting fact check sites to support their bias. TRUMP has turned things around and now conservatives feel they have a louder voice to call out media bias and fake news on the left.
 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
we need to keep it simple, so people will embrace socialism.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs.

Junk Bonds, not Junk Laws!

A positive multiplier does the rest.

Grow our economy, we Must.
/——/ Who the hell can live in Bevearly Hills on $15 an hour? We need $50 minimum wage now.
 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
we need to keep it simple, so people will embrace socialism.

we really just need a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage, unemployment compensation for being unemployed on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, and Industrial Automation to help with social costs.

Junk Bonds, not Junk Laws!

A positive multiplier does the rest.

Grow our economy, we Must.
/——/ Who the hell can live in Bevearly Hills on $15 an hour? We need $50 minimum wage now.
should we Tax the Rich into capital Heaven?
 
Well, maybe it's because they write what sells.

Or maybe it's because when someone lies so much, fact checking becomes normal. When people don't lie much, then people don't fact check much.

But, you have to see everything from a severely limited view point and everything must be convenient for you, right?
Yes attacking Trump daily certainly saved CNN and MSLSD from certain bankruptcy. So yeah, it sells with their customers. This doesn’t alleviate the fact that they are essentially a wing of the D party promoting propaganda.

I don’t buy that Trump lies anymore than BO did. Trump clearly lies with less sophistication, but BO had the entire MSM protecting him.

Since when does a newspaper not have to be biased towards one side? Since when has a newspaper NOT been biased? How is it possible not to be biased?

You have to report one way or the other, right? The only real way is to report both sides, and people who buy newspapers don't really want to read both sides.

So, you'd go bankrupt.

This is the way it goes. Has always gone. But most people have only just found out that the media can be biased. Where the fuck have they been?

Yep, and even the NTY and WaPo have regular conservative op-ed contributors.

So does Fox, big deal, the outlets are what they are, they are all biased and heavily so.

Nonsense - other than a couple of token and not-so-bright "lefties" like Bob "Dry Drunk" Bechtel and Juan Williams, they engage in the occasional 4 on 1 shutdown and CUT HIS MIC/ SHUTUP!!! operation.


Whatever you need to believe to get by.
 
The government should make the minimum wage $1000/hour!


Now we’re all millionaires!

Everyone will live in a mansion and own a yacht!

Woo hooo!
 
I’m not surprised that Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez have no clue what they are talking about. That’s a given. I am shocked that CNN actually fact checked something

"It is likely that the actual cost of Medicare-for-all would be substantially greater than these estimates, which assume significant administrative and drug cost savings under the plan, and also assume that health care providers operating under Medicare-for-all will be reimbursed at rates more than 40 percent lower than those currently paid by private health insurance," Blahous wrote in the paper's abstract, according to factcheck.org.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34683/watch-cnns-tapper-fact-checks-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra
Funded by the Koch Brothers?

Coal Companies' Secret Funding of Climate Science Denial Exposed
 

Forum List

Back
Top