Admiral Rockwell Tory
Diamond Member
5mm? Millimeters are very small.
Clintons Refuse to Testify on Epstein Case
- Thread starter Zincwarrior
- Start date
Dorian Mode
Diamond Member
- Apr 19, 2025
- 2,574
- 3,823
- 1,918
And what have we learned this year about these creatures, also known as democrap scum? Power and control means the ability to grift and scam. More power and control means more grifts and scams. The democrap party is nothing other than an organized crime syndicate. The real question we should be asking now is: How many Learing Centers are there throughout the country?
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 90,099
- 81,886
- 3,615
Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify."James Comer Demands the Clintons Testify or Face ‘Contempt of Congress Proceedings’
In a statement released on Friday, House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-KY) threatened to pursue “contempt of Congress proceedings” against the Clintons if they continue to refuse to testify in the committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe.
The warning comes after months of stalled negotiations between the committee and attorneys for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, both of whom were subpoenaed...
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.
“Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,” the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. “For us, now is that time.”
Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer
Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.
Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.
Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.
But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas “invalid and legally unenforceable,” then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.
In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.
But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process “literally designed to result in our imprisonment.”
“We are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,” they wrote.
In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to “release irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.”
President Trump said it best…
"I hope that the committee goes after them and holds them accountable criminally."
Dr Grump
Platinum Member
Have you seen Bondi and Dwarf Patel in front of Congress? If it's good enough for them....
badbob85037
Diamond Member
- Jun 30, 2018
- 4,268
- 2,988
- 1,938
This is old news. Anyone who knows history knows democrats have been under handed sexual predators or beyond stupid since before the First Civil War. I wonder how much burning has to go on till the second?Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify."James Comer Demands the Clintons Testify or Face ‘Contempt of Congress Proceedings’
In a statement released on Friday, House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-KY) threatened to pursue “contempt of Congress proceedings” against the Clintons if they continue to refuse to testify in the committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe.
The warning comes after months of stalled negotiations between the committee and attorneys for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, both of whom were subpoenaed...
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.
“Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,” the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. “For us, now is that time.”
Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer
Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.
Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.
Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.
But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas “invalid and legally unenforceable,” then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.
In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.
But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process “literally designed to result in our imprisonment.”
“We are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,” they wrote.
In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to “release irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.”
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 105,192
- 38,777
- 2,250
Maga cult set the precedent of not testifying. Quit whining.Please see this thread.
Update: Clintons refuse to testify."James Comer Demands the Clintons Testify or Face ‘Contempt of Congress Proceedings’
In a statement released on Friday, House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-KY) threatened to pursue “contempt of Congress proceedings” against the Clintons if they continue to refuse to testify in the committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe.
The warning comes after months of stalled negotiations between the committee and attorneys for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, both of whom were subpoenaed...
Bill and Hillary Clinton refused on Tuesday to testify in the House’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation, escalating a monthslong battle with Representative James R. Comer, Republican of Kentucky, and effectively daring him to follow through on his threats to hold them in contempt of Congress.
“Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,” the Clintons wrote in a lengthy letter to Mr. Comer, which was obtained by The New York Times. “For us, now is that time.”
Read the Clintons’ Personal Letter to Comer
Bill and Hillary Clinton wrote a lengthy letter to Representative James R. Comer of Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the Oversight Committee, refusing to testify in Congress.
Read Document 4 pages
Mr. Comer’s relentless efforts to force them to testify reflect his overall approach to his panel’s Epstein inquiry. As the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Mr. Comer has sought to shift the focus from President Trump’s ties to the convicted sex offender and his administration’s decision to close its investigation into the matter without releasing key information. Instead, he has sought to shift the spotlight onto prominent Democrats who once associated with Mr. Epstein and his longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell.
Mr. Comer has repeatedly threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they failed to appear for live depositions behind closed doors, typically a first step in referring someone to the Justice Department for prosecution. He had set a deadline of Tuesday for Mr. Clinton to appear, and Wednesday for Mrs. Clinton.
But hours before the deadline, the Clintons made clear that they had no intention of presenting themselves on Capitol Hill to be questioned by Mr. Comer and members of his committee. They did so by submitting an eight-page legal letter laying out why they considered the subpoenas “invalid and legally unenforceable,” then followed up with a scorching missive that they signed jointly, promising to fight Mr. Comer on the issue for as long as it took.
In the letter, the Clintons noted that they had proactively provided Mr. Comer with sworn statements similar to ones he had accepted from seven or eight other former law enforcement officials he had also subpoenaed and then excused from testifying before the committee. The Clintons have repeatedly said they have no knowledge relevant to the investigation.
But on Tuesday, they went further, publicly going to war against Mr. Comer on the matter with moves that appeared to lay the predicate for what could be a messy legal battle. In a letter that touched on Mr. Trump’s immigration crackdown, his use of the Justice Department to prosecute his enemies and even Republicans’ opposition to extending health care subsidies, the Clintons accused Mr. Comer of potentially bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a politically driven process “literally designed to result in our imprisonment.”
“We are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends,” they wrote.
In the letter, the Clintons said they had anticipated that Mr. Comer would still direct his committee to seek to hold them in contempt, and they expected him to “release irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us.”
I think Stevie Bannon and Rodger Stone might disagree with you.
dudmuck
Diamond Member
its because this hearing needs to be public. no closed door hearings that can be misrepresented with no official transcripts. This is the same reason Hunter Biden only agreed to public hearing.
Why did he do a closed door hearing then?
dudmuck
Diamond Member
- Initial Refusal (Dec 2023): Hunter Biden defied a subpoena for a private deposition, holding a press conference outside the Capitol to state his willingness for a public hearing instead, citing fears of his testimony being distorted.
- GOP Response: House Republicans threatened contempt of Congress proceedings and moved to hold him in contempt for defying the subpoena.
- Agreement & Later Deposition (Jan/Feb 2024): After negotiations, Hunter Biden agreed to a closed-door deposition with the condition that transcripts would be released quickly, and a public hearing would follow, according to AP News and The New York Times.
- Testimony: During the deposition, Hunter Biden denied involving his father, President Biden, in his business dealings and accused Republicans of manipulating evidence, notes PBS and ABC News.
Is this your DUH post?
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 119,876
- 123,046
- 3,645
Right on brand
GOP losers with no actual agenda or ideas go after the Clintons over tabloid innuendo
GOP losers with no actual agenda or ideas go after the Clintons over tabloid innuendo
Squad members helped with the vote.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 119,876
- 123,046
- 3,645
Neat
marvin martian
Diamond Member
The loons are going to defend the Clintons to the very end...
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 119,876
- 123,046
- 3,645
Haha, you guys are trying to out dumbfuck each other
If they had nothing to hide, they would have nothing to fear. They're retired. They have plenty of time to testify. What's the problem?
I have always liked Bill Clinton. I voted for him. Right now this looks bad. I want every man who committed statutory rape at Epstein Island to be exposed and punished. Right now, it looks like Bill Clinton is guilty. I guess Monica Lewinsky was not enough for him.
- Mar 3, 2013
- 89,206
- 53,430
- 2,605
Of course he did not. Bill likes them younger than 16 years old.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
US Marine Kicked Out of US Senate Hearing Yelling "No One Wants to Fight for Israel!"- Started by munkle
- Replies: 7
-
Are you good with Trump the fascist Nazi dictator totalitarian as long as all of his actions benefit America as a whole?- Started by BrokeLoser
- Replies: 29
