Clinton Supporters Respond to Latest Hillary Scandal!!!

I really don't think this qualifies as a "scandal", yet.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! That's funny.
Have I missed something since this came out yesterday afternoon?


That's what I've been asking. And getting similar answers.

Apparently the strategy is to just keep bleating "scandal" over and over until it comes to be believed, and if anybody asks for where the scandal is you make barnyard noises and hope they shut up.

They're enslaved to headlines and unable to handle context.
Fortunately --- I'm not:

>> The disclosure by the Federal Bureau of Investigation late on Friday, October 28 that it had discovered potential new evidence in its inquiry into Hillary Clinton’s handling of her personal email when she was Secretary of State has virtually nothing to do with any actions taken by the Democratic nominee, according to government records and an official with knowledge of the investigation, who spoke to Newsweek on condition of anonymity.

.... This new evidence relates to how Abedin managed her emails. She maintained four email accounts—an unclassified State Department account, another on the clintonemail.com domain and a third on Yahoo. The fourth was linked to her husband’s account; she used it to support his activities when he was running for Congress, investigative records show. Abedin, who did not know Clinton used a private server for her emails, told the bureau in an April interview that she used the account on the clintonemail.com domain only for issues related to the Secretary’s personal affairs, such as communicating with her friends. For work-related records, Abedin primarily used the email account provided to her by the State Department.

Because Clinton preferred to read documents on paper rather than on a screen, emails and other files were often printed out and provided to her either at her office or home, where they were delivered in a diplomatic pouch by a security agent. Abedin, like many State Department officials, found the government network technology to be cumbersome, and she had great trouble printing documents there, investigative records show. As a result, she sometimes transferred emails from her unclassified State Department account to either her Yahoo account or her account on Clinton’s server, and printed the emails from there. It is not clear whether she ever transferred official emails to the account she used for her husband’s campaign.

Abedin would use this procedure for printing documents when she received emails she believed Clinton needed to see and when the Secretary forwarded emails to her for printing. Abedin told the FBI she would often print these emails without reading them. Abedin printed a large number of emails this way, in part because, investigative records show, other staff members considered her Clinton’s “gatekeeper” and often sent Abedin electronic communications they wanted the Secretary to see.

This procedure for printing documents, the government official says, appears to be how the newly discovered emails ended up on the laptop shared by Abedin and her husband. It is unclear whether any of those documents were downloaded onto the laptop off of her personal email accounts or were saved on an external storage device, such as a flash drive, and then transferred to the shared computer. There is also evidence that the laptop was used to send emails from Abedin to Clinton; however, none of those emails are the ones being examined by the FBI. Moreover, unless she was told by Abedin in every instance, Clinton could not have known what device her aide was using to transmit electronic information to her.

If the FBI determines that any of the documents that ended up on the shared device were classified, Abedin could be deemed to have mishandled them. In order to prove that was a criminal offense, however, investigators would have to establish that Abedin had intended to disclose the contents of those classified documents, or that she knew she was mishandling that information.

If the documents were not classified, no crime was committed. <<​

Meaning, by Huma Abedin.

>> His decision to immediately reveal this discovery was not a partisan act, although it was a horribly mishandled one. Arguably, he had to issue his letter because of previous statements he had made to Congress. In September, he testified that the bureau had completed its review of the evidence in the case and found no crimes had been committed. With the discovery of the information on the laptop shared by Weiner and Abedin, that sworn statement was no longer true, and there was new evidence that needed to be examined. As a result, Comey felt he was obligated to inform the committees as quickly as possible that his previous statement was now incorrect.

.... In a communication to bureau employees, Comey described his letter to Congress as an attempt to thread a needle – amend his testimony while not disclosing details of an ongoing investigation. The combination, however, created a circumstance where politicians are filling in the blanks, creating a storyline of corruption that was not justified by the evidence developed by the bureau. Making it worse, the communication to the bureau employees is far more detailed than what Comey issued to Congress.

“There is a significant risk of being misunderstood,” Comey told the bureau employees in the communication, explaining why he was so vague in his letter to Congress. “It would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record. At the same time, however, given that we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression.”

... The truth is much less explosive. There is no indication the emails in question were withheld by Clinton during the investigation, the law enforcement official told Newsweek, nor does the discovery suggest she did anything illegal. Also, none of the emails were to or from Clinton, the official said. Moreover, despite the widespread claims in the media that this development had prompted the FBI to “reopen” of the case, it did not; such investigations are never actually closed, and it is common for law enforcement to discover new information that needs to be examined.<< Newsweek

Yada yada yada. Face facts: Hillary is done. Get used to saying "President Trump."
 
I really don't think this qualifies as a "scandal", yet.

It's 3 scandals in one:



Let it be called, the weiner-gate. Fitting name for the scandal that toók down the feminist candidate.


And yet ---- you can't explain how it's a "scandal" huh?


So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election? Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis... they would come out from it as complete fools.

This is what must be cycling in Clinonians' heads right now:

 
bill clinton rally today --LOL


Cv8dUvvVIAA3Tee.jpg


MicroSpookyLeaks™ on Twitter
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.


they certainly are taking another look into that investigation

wonder how many of the 33 thousand missing emails will show up

wonder how many are work related

how many classified

questions questions
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.


they certainly are taking another look into that investigation

wonder how many of the 33 thousand missing emails will show up

wonder how many are work related

how many classified

questions questions

The Clinton clan is in full denial mode. Deny, deny deny...

Chances are that the emails are very damaging. He didn't get the recommendation for no reason. The FBI is done looking like a bunch of establishment clowns.
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.


they certainly are taking another look into that investigation

wonder how many of the 33 thousand missing emails will show up

wonder how many are work related

how many classified

questions questions

The Clinton clan is in full denial mode. Deny, deny deny...

Chances are that the emails are very damaging. He didn't get the recommendation for no reason. The FBI is done looking like a bunch of establishment clowns.

she knows what emails they are

she knows the feds cant release the evidence

that is why she talk big about it now
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.


they certainly are taking another look into that investigation

wonder how many of the 33 thousand missing emails will show up

wonder how many are work related

how many classified

questions questions

The Clinton clan is in full denial mode. Deny, deny deny...

Chances are that the emails are very damaging. He didn't get the recommendation for no reason. The FBI is done looking like a bunch of establishment clowns.
He gave the recommendation because the entire FBI was going to revolt if he didn't.
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.


they certainly are taking another look into that investigation

wonder how many of the 33 thousand missing emails will show up

wonder how many are work related

how many classified

questions questions

The Clinton clan is in full denial mode. Deny, deny deny...

Chances are that the emails are very damaging. He didn't get the recommendation for no reason. The FBI is done looking like a bunch of establishment clowns.

"Deny" ----- what?

Kinda strange that there's no answer for that, doncha think?
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.

No, they're NOT. They don't "reopen" for one thing.

Didn't read post 18 at all didja? But you took the time to cut that reference out of my post?

Wassamatta? Afraid?

This gives me a great idea.
I'm going to go roving around on Hallowe'en dressed as ---- post 18. Apparently it's terrifying.
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.

No, they're NOT. They don't "reopen" for one thing.

Didn't read post 18 at all didja? But you took the time to cut that reference out of my post?

Wassamatta? Afraid?

This gives me a great idea.
I'm going to go roving around on Hallowe'en dressed as ---- post 18. Apparently it's terrifying.

Complete bullshit, you are in denial.

Do you understand, comey SAID he was going to close the case. Now he is back on it. No surprise the text is being stupid with the technicalities, which don't mean a shit. She is in deep trouble.

Deny, deny, deny...
 
Clinton Supporters Respond to Latest Hillary Scandal!!!

--- and what "scandal" is that?

Member how I just asked you that same question in another thread and you couldn't answer so you ran away?
Good times.
The one that's the top story in the news you boob.
 
So it's not a scandal that FBI is opening an investigation into her about a week before an election?

If the FBI were actually doing that, it might be, depending on the results. But they're not.


Let's be honest, they wouldn't be opening it without any basis

Nope, they wouldn't. And they aren't.

Yes they are...

"This morning I sent a letter to Congress in connection with the Secretary Clinton email investigation. Yesterday, the investigative team briefed me on their recommendation with respect to seeking access to emails that have recently been found in an unrelated case. Because those emails appear to be pertinent to our investigation, I agreed that we should take appropriate steps to obtain and review them.

Of course, we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.
I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record."

Going to prison.

No, they're NOT. They don't "reopen" for one thing.

Didn't read post 18 at all didja? But you took the time to cut that reference out of my post?

Wassamatta? Afraid?

This gives me a great idea.
I'm going to go roving around on Hallowe'en dressed as ---- post 18. Apparently it's terrifying.

Complete bullshit, you are in denial.

Do you understand, comey SAID he was going to close the case. Now he is back on it. No surprise the text is being stupid with the technicalities, which don't mean a shit. She is in deep trouble.

Deny, deny, deny...

Once AGAIN --- "deny" what?

You can't answer, because you don't know. Or more likely you read my post and you do know and you're running and hiding from it because it's Soooo inconvenient that there's nothing there to "deny".

Going to prison.

Oh I'm not sure you need to go to prison just because you're ignoring the details.
See, I don't know if you're aware of this but in order for somebody to go to prison, there has to be some kind of crime.
 
Last edited:
Clinton Supporters Respond to Latest Hillary Scandal!!!

--- and what "scandal" is that?

Member how I just asked you that same question in another thread and you couldn't answer so you ran away?
Good times.
The one that's the top story in the news you boob.

The question remains open, as it has been all day ---
How is that 'top story' a 'scandal'?

John Hirschbeck had a roving strike zone last night --- that's a scandal.
 
Clinton Supporters Respond to Latest Hillary Scandal!!!

--- and what "scandal" is that?

Member how I just asked you that same question in another thread and you couldn't answer so you ran away?
Good times.
The one that's the top story in the news you boob.

The question remains open, as it has been all day ---
How is that 'top story' a 'scandal'?

John Hirschbeck had a roving strike zone last night --- that's a scandal.
FBI letter to Congress on Clinton email probe
Read it yourself when you get done grazing in the pasture.
 

Forum List

Back
Top