Climatic differences in Chinese CO2, a peer reviewed scientific research paper absolving our CCP Masters

[CrusaderFrank]

It is well established the American CO2 output is causing the Sixth Great Extinction (see Crick, mamooth, Old Rocks). This paper lays out the all the necessary data to absolve the CCP from any culpability with respect to the current climate crisis (ibid). American CO2, because it attacks Earth's poles on a per capita basis (ibid), is the most dangerous variant of CO2, imagine if Covid and Ebola had a kid, that's USA CO2.

Therefore, it is appropriate that the USA alone pay $78 Trillion to save the planet.

We have a strong consensus, there's no need to present anything like facts or experiments (ibid, especially see Crick)

Science = Settled!

 

[Moonglow]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

It is well established the American CO2 output is causing the Sixth Great Extinction (see Crick, mamooth, Old Rocks). This paper lays out the all the necessary data to absolve the CCP from any culpability with respect to the current climate crisis (ibid). American CO2, because it attacks Earth's poles on a per capita basis (ibid), is the most dangerous variant of CO2, imagine if Covid and Ebola had a kid, that's USA CO2.

Therefore, it is appropriate that the USA alone pay $78 Trillion to save the planet.

We have a strong consensus, there's no need to present anything like facts or experiments (ibid, especially see Crick)

Science = Settled!

The acceptance and peer review only required a payment through Hunter

 

[ReinyDays]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

It is well established the American CO2 output is causing the Sixth Great Extinction (see Crick, mamooth, Old Rocks). This paper lays out the all the necessary data to absolve the CCP from any culpability with respect to the current climate crisis (ibid). American CO2, because it attacks Earth's poles on a per capita basis (ibid), is the most dangerous variant of CO2, imagine if Covid and Ebola had a kid, that's USA CO2.

Therefore, it is appropriate that the USA alone pay $78 Trillion to save the planet.

We have a strong consensus, there's no need to present anything like facts or experiments (ibid, especially see Crick)

Science = Settled!

HUH?

You forget something?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is well established the American CO2 output is causing the Sixth Great Extinction (see Crick, mamooth, Old Rocks). This paper lays out the all the necessary data to absolve the CCP from any culpability with respect to the current climate crisis (ibid). American CO2, because it attacks Earth's poles on a per capita basis (ibid), is the most dangerous variant of CO2, imagine if Covid and Ebola had a kid, that's USA CO2.

Therefore, it is appropriate that the USA alone pay $78 Trillion to save the planet.

We have a strong consensus, there's no need to present anything like facts or experiments (ibid, especially see Crick)

Science = Settled!

The acceptance and peer review only required a payment through Hunter

10% for the Big Guy

 

[CrusaderFrank]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

 

[ReinyDays]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

 

[ding]

sarcasm is making fun of truths ...

Is it?

sarcasm: the use of irony to mock or convey contempt.

 

[Sunsettommy]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Ahhh I wasn't sure if it was sarcasm or not.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

Did making fun of AGW Cult hurt your feelz?

 

[westwall]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

Sarcasm is also wildly overstating lies to show how ridiculous they are.

 

[ding]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

Did making fun of AGW Cult hurt your feelz?

I don't think that was it. I think RD prefers the high road. There's nothing wrong with that. To each his own.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

Did making fun of AGW Cult hurt your feelz?

I don't think that was it. I think RD prefers the high road. There's nothing wrong with that. To each his own.

So the OP was an actual peer reviewed scientific paper?

Talk about a low bar

 

[ding]

a peer reviewed scientific research paper​

That you pulled out of yer arse or is there a link?

No link means it never happened ... "peer reviewed scientific research paper" sounds impressive although clearly the OP doesn't know what it means ... sad ...

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Sad

Some alien totally drained your sense of sarcasm.

Technically ... those are lies ... sarcasm is making fun of truths ... this is ridicule ... try not to let your hatred cloud your discernment ...

Did making fun of AGW Cult hurt your feelz?

I don't think that was it. I think RD prefers the high road. There's nothing wrong with that. To each his own.

So the OP was an actual peer reviewed scientific paper?

Talk about a low bar

I didn't think it was. I took the OP as tongue in cheek. I think RD was replying in tongue in cheek to the tongue in cheek.

 

[Stryder50]

Just tried duckduckgo search using most of the OP title, and of course this thread was first hit on the list. This was second hit on list and though nearly 13 years back, rather interesting;

Peer-Reviewed Research Suggests Very Little Warming from CO2​

by E. Calvin Beisner

March 24, 2008
...
A year-old article in Idõjárás: Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service is suddenly getting attention in the meteorological community. And it deserves it. By Hungarian meteorologist Ferenc M. Miskolczi, the peer-reviewed article uses rigorous mathematical and physical analysis to re-estimate climate sensitivity–that is, the amount of warming to be expected from doubled atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. Miskolczi’s answer: not the 2 to 5 degrees C typically asserted by those who push fears of catastrophic manmade warming, runaway greenhouse effect, and tipping points, but 0.24 degree C.
...

Peer-Reviewed Research Suggests Very Little Warming from CO2

A year-old article in Idõjárás: Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service is suddenly getting attention in the meteorological community. And it deserves it. By Hungarian meteorologist Ferenc M. Miskolczi, the peer-reviewed article uses rigorous mathematical and physical analysis to r

cornwallalliance.org

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Just tried duckduckgo search using most of the OP title, and of course this thread was first hit on the list. This was second hit on list and though nearly 13 years back, rather interesting;

Peer-Reviewed Research Suggests Very Little Warming from CO2​

by E. Calvin Beisner

March 24, 2008
...
A year-old article in Idõjárás: Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service is suddenly getting attention in the meteorological community. And it deserves it. By Hungarian meteorologist Ferenc M. Miskolczi, the peer-reviewed article uses rigorous mathematical and physical analysis to re-estimate climate sensitivity–that is, the amount of warming to be expected from doubled atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide. Miskolczi’s answer: not the 2 to 5 degrees C typically asserted by those who push fears of catastrophic manmade warming, runaway greenhouse effect, and tipping points, but 0.24 degree C.
...

Peer-Reviewed Research Suggests Very Little Warming from CO2

A year-old article in Idõjárás: Quarterly Journal of the Hungarian Meteorological Service is suddenly getting attention in the meteorological community. And it deserves it. By Hungarian meteorologist Ferenc M. Miskolczi, the peer-reviewed article uses rigorous mathematical and physical analysis to r

cornwallalliance.org

Another fun search is asking the AGW Scammers to show us one single experiment that demonstrates how much additional heat is generated from increasing CO2 from 280 to 400PPM

They can't and never do because NO additional heat is trapped at those levels