Climate change: 2015 will be the hottest year on record 'by a mile', experts say

[threegoofs]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

 

[threegoofs]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

 

[threegoofs]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.

Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...

Get real....

Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.

I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?

Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.

Klien gave us the sea rise crap..

Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.

The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Do you really want to fuck with us paid noob?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth

 

[Wyatt earp]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth

Yup lassy we have heart, soul and real science on our side

They just have paid pretend science And propaganda on theirs..

 

[threegoofs]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.

Well, sources are quite revealing.

And your lack of competent sources is even more revealing.

 

[threegoofs]

Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.

Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...

Get real....

Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.

I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?

Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.

Klien gave us the sea rise crap..

Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.

The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Do you really want to fuck with us paid noob?

Ah, yes. I must be part of the conspiracy, right?

 

[threegoofs]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

Can't find one, huh?

 

[Old Rocks]

Mr. Beale, do you have anything to contribute other than some rather stupid cartoons? Perhaps an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal? That is what is so lovable about you deniars. You think that stupidity equals real science.

Says the guy who read all three of Naomi Klein's books...

Get real....

Have you ever noticed that he only reads left wing, socialist control monger, enviro-wacko books? And when real science is shown he ignores it? This idiot thinks John Cook, Naomi Klien, James Hansen, and the king Micheal Mann are reliable and do real science.. When they have all been proven incorrect and agenda driven.

I have always used common sense in these debates until Just a few days ago started to research Naomi, thanks ,now I will really have to research John Cook, James Hansen and Micheal Cann but I think I know him he is that zealot who gave us that 97% of all scientist agree claim right?

Cook, Nuttercelie and others at Skeptical Science gave us the 97% Lie.

Klien gave us the sea rise crap..

Hansen is the main adjuster of the climate records upward for 30 years. He and the likes of Phil Jones (CRU) and Michale Mann (used one tree ring proxies and threw out the other 14 which showed his theroy a lie)dumped data and lied about the manipulations they were doing while dumping the original data to keep others from learning the truth. These people made the US and global Climate record unusable for any scientific endeavor.

The people they revere are liars and thieves with a socialist command and control agenda. The UN's IPCC has but one job and that is to deprive all of the US citizens of our constitutional rights to land, personal property and our individual sovereignty. Their goal is one world government under socialist control, it has been for over 85 years. UN AGENDA 21.

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Do you really want to fuck with us paid noob?

Damn, Bear, fucking with a willfully ignorant ass is all too easy. Perhaps you are a paid poster, doesn't mean everyone else is. I certainly am not. I make a very adaquaete salary where I work.

 

[Old Rocks]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.

Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.

 

[threegoofs]

EDITORIAL: Climate scientists manipulate data to support warming - Washington Times

More Countries Caught Manipulating Their Climate Data

The fiddling with temperature data is the biggest science scandal ever

Tracking Climate Fraud

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.

Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.

I'm starting to see the pattern here. No coherent arguments, denial of basic facts, and misinterpretation simple sources.

And then when they've not noting else, they accuse the other side of being paid to post.

Oh, well, I guess they think I seem very professional.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Oh. Denier blogs and The Washington Times.

Seems like major science journals would have this as a story, since fraudulent data is massively destructive to both scientific journals and scientific careers.

But I guess they are in on the plot too, huh? And I bet you think pharma has a cure for cancer but won't release it because they want people sick to make money too...

Go away, noob

I thought so.

Can't respond, so you pretend that your length of time being wrong somehow trumps my length of time pointing out you're wrong.

All you are doing is harping on sources...I have little patience for that rookie crap.

Yessireee............ Silly lass hates sources. Much prefers nonsense form obese junkies and fake British Lords.

I'm starting to see the pattern here. No coherent arguments, denial of basic facts, and misinterpretation simple sources.

And then when they've not noting else, they accuse the other side of being paid to post.

Oh, well, I guess they think I seem very professional.

i'll stick with degreed scientist over you...You think you know more then them??? No wonder you think we don't need any of our science institutions. Goddamn, seek help.

What denial of basic facts? This year based on the surface data is turning out to be extremely warm. How is that denial? This is partly because of a insanely powerful nino! How is that not a fact?

Professional? lol You wouldn't be made a toilet washer at the noaa. haha

 

[ScienceRocks]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

Can't find one, huh?

Can you show me your secret temperature data base? Otherwise, you couldn't hit the back side of a barn standing 5 feet away.

 

[ScienceRocks]

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth

Yup lassy we have heart, soul and real science on our side

They just have paid pretend science And propaganda on theirs..

Noaa, nasa and nearly every science institution on this planet is fake? Is that what you're saying??? You're mentally challenged if you believe this. I do feel sorry for you and believe you may very well have much heart in what you believe.

 

[threegoofs]

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

You hit all the paid poster crap in one shot.. congratulations! You must be a proud reader of Skeptical Crap and Lies Science..

If anyone is paying that one they are not getting their money worth

Yup lassy we have heart, soul and real science on our side

They just have paid pretend science And propaganda on theirs..

Noaa, nasa and nearly every science institution on this planet is fake? Is that what you're saying??? You're mentally challenged if you believe this. I do feel sorry for you and believe you may very well have much heart in what you believe.

I think you're confused.

I'm the one who said the Washington Times was a ridiculous source.

 

[flacaltenn]

Obama is a serial liar.

Obama continually claims AGW is a fact as he did today in Alaska.

Why would anyone believe anything a liar says?

What reason have I to give anything you post credibility?

And every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is a fact and that it is also a clear and present danger.

What reason should anyone give anything you post concerning AGW/CC any credibility?

After all, you do enjoy repeating the lies don't you?

In my short time here, he seems like he's spot on.

If you think he's wrong, I'm sure you can come up with a list of organizations that deny AGW is a problem, right?

Here's a hint- you might want to skip all the major organizations/ the National Academy of Sciences, AAAS, the Royal Society, etc. because their statements are clear.

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Consensus

What WAS the consensus of those organizations ?? And what exact question did they answer? Because the world is slightly warming and NOBODY rejects the premise that climate changes.. Did they POLL their membership on any important questions --- or was this a front office statement?

Did they answer the question of what the additional temperature rise was gonna by in 2050? 2100? If not -- how is a massive remediation campaign justified? It's not about fluff and propaganda statements.. It's about science. And if you don't know what questions these "consensus statements" answer -- you better figure out what the scientific arguments ARE -- before you go waving "statements" in front of folks who have folllowed this science misadventure for decades....