Climate change 10X faster than ever before report Stanford scientists

francoHFW

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
79,271
Reaction score
9,409
Points
2,030
Location
NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
Stanford Report Stanford scientists: Climate change on pace to occur 10 times faster than any ...
Stanford Report
10 hours ago Written by
Bjorn Carey



Not only is the planet undergoing one of the largest climate changes in the past 65 million years, Stanford climate scientists Noah Diffenbaugh and Chris Field report that it's on pace to occur at a rate 10 times faster than any change in that period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't matter. The 'science' I mean.

dimocrap scum decided years ago that if they could acquire the means to control Energy, its production, use and distribution then they could control everything and every one on the Planet.

Which is their goal. Has been all along.

Maybe when it all started out, it was a good faith look into the effects, if any, of carbon production by Man and its interaction with the Atmosphere and the Climate.

But like dimocraps do with everything they get their hooks into, they radicalized it.

I remember when the Big Scare was "Global Cooling".

Contrast that to today's Witch Doctors in the AGW hoax and you'll find.... There is no contrast to speak of. It's all guessing and made-up data

Facebook_meme_Global_Cooling_11.gif


And now we have this kind of shit going on inside our current totalitarian-wannabe regime.....

People better wake up and realize what kind of scum we're dealing with

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell Wants “No Climate Change Deniers” In Her Department…

130206_sally_jewell_obama_lg-550x363.jpg

Does that look like your typical dimocrap female or what?

Willfully ignorant.

Via TPM:

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell addressed her employees Thursday on the “moral imperative” to address climate change, reminding them they are able to “actually do something about it,”E&E News reported.

“I hope there are no climate change deniers in the Department of Interior,” she said.

If any climate change deniers did work in the department, Jewell continued, they should visit the federally managed lands where the changing climate is visible. She listed the melting permafrost in Alaska and the shrinking snowpacks in the Sierra Mountains as examples, according to E&E.

Jewell also gave a “shout-out” to Bureau of Reclamation Commissioner Michael Connor, who was nominated by Obama for the deputy secretary of Interior post, E&E reported.
- See more at: Weasel Zippers | Scouring the bowels of the internet | Weasel Zippers
 
Sure. Pub dupes!! The only conspiracy here is the greedy idiot GOP one, the one with the brainwashed Sean Rushbeck etc etc bots....see sig... As far as I remember, that TIME bs was the extent of that "scare". This is fact, no matter what some fools at an obscure Essex college and Rush say...
 
Last edited:
Sure. Pub dupes!! The only conspiracy here is the greedy idiot GOP one, the one with the brainwashed Sean Rushbeck etc etc bots....see sig... As far as I remember, that TIME bs was the extent of that scare. This is fact, no matter what some fools at an obscure Essex college and Rush say...

I guess the Clinic isn't open yet, huh?
 
I remember the Global cooling BS as well. Saying the world is going to turn to ice.

Then I remember the ones saying that the sea levels will rise by now, and all coasts in the world will be covered in water. I live on the coast, so I should have already drowned according to the wacks from the left.

But low and behold, the sea levels haven't risen and nature takes care of itself. The ice has been melting in the North since, ......................THE ICE AGE. What would these libs want,................another ice age..............

They yell and scream and demand and NOTHING THEY SAY PANS OUT. While the ice coverage to the North gets less the ice to the South grows.

President Reagan said it best, “It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.” ― Ronald Reagan
 
NASA - NASA Study Examines Antarctic Sea Ice Increases

NASA and British Antarctic Survey scientists have reported the first direct evidence that marked changes to Antarctic sea ice drift caused by changing winds are responsible for observed increases in Antarctic sea ice cover in the past two decades. The results help explain why, unlike the dramatic sea ice losses being reported in the Arctic, Antarctic sea ice cover has increased under the effects of climate change.

Research scientists Ron Kwok of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and Paul Holland of the Natural Environment Research Council's British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom, used maps created by JPL from more than five million individual daily ice-motion measurements. The data, captured over a period of 19 years by four U.S. Defense Meteorological satellites, show, for the first time, long-term changes in sea ice drift around Antarctica.

"Until now, these changes in ice drift were only speculated upon, using computer models of Antarctic winds," said Holland, lead author of the study published this week in the journal Nature Geosciences. "This study of direct satellite observations shows the complexity of climate change. The total Antarctic sea ice cover is increasing slowly, but individual regions are actually experiencing much larger gains and losses that are almost offsetting each other overall.

"We now know that these regional changes are caused by changes in the winds, which, in turn, affect the ice cover through changes in both ice drift and air temperature," he continued. "The changes in ice drift also suggest large changes in the ocean surrounding Antarctica, which is very sensitive to the cold and salty water produced by sea ice growth."

Holland said sea ice around Antarctica is constantly being blown away from the continent by strong northward winds. "Since 1992, this ice drift has changed," he said. "In some areas, the export of ice away from Antarctica has doubled, while in others it has decreased significantly."

Sea ice plays a key role in Earth's environment, reflecting heat from the sun and providing a habitat for marine life. At both poles, sea ice cover is at its minimum during late summer. However, during the winter freeze in Antarctica, this ice cover expands to an area roughly twice the size of Europe. Ranging in thickness from less than three feet (a meter) to several meters, the ice insulates the warm ocean from the frigid atmosphere above.

This new research also helps explain why observed changes in the amount of sea ice cover are so different in the two polar regions. The Arctic has experienced dramatic ice losses in recent decades, while the overall ice extent in the Antarctic has increased slightly. However, this small Antarctic increase is actually the result of much larger regional increases and decreases, which are now shown to be caused by wind-driven changes. In places, increased northward winds have caused the sea ice cover to expand outwards from Antarctica. In contrast, the Arctic Ocean is surrounded by land, so changed winds cannot cause Arctic ice to expand in the same way.

"The Antarctic sea ice cover interacts with the global climate system very differently than that of the Arctic, and these results highlight the sensitivity of the Antarctic ice coverage to changes in the strength of the winds around the continent," said Kwok.

Climate change has had contrasting impacts across Antarctica in recent decades. The Antarctic Peninsula has warmed as much as anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere, while East Antarctica has shown little change or even a small cooling around the coast. The new research improves understanding of present and future climate change. The authors note it is important to distinguish between the Antarctic Ice Sheet - glacial ice - which is losing volume, and Antarctic sea ice - frozen seawater - which is expanding.

The research was funded by NASA and the Natural Environment Research Council.


AS I STATED

Nature takes care of itself, even though the NASA report still pushes climate change in this report. The Ice IS GROWING DOWN THERE.

Please Libs show us the DRAMATIC SEA LEVEL INCREASES and I'll get my boat ready.
 
Yeah, it was all through the 60s and 70s.

The 1970s Ice Age Scare | Real Science

screenhunter_165-feb-10-06-30.jpg



screenhunter_06-may-07-09-01.jpg



Almost every major climate organization endorsed the 1970s ice age scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA – as did the CIA.

screenhunter_36-feb-07-00-051-1.gif


dimocraps never change. They've always been stupid, they'always BE stupid
 
Ain't it great the way the Pub Propaganda Machine organizes, spins, and blows out of proportion all this BS for you, hater dupes? This has happened, the new ice age was a prediction for the future that never happened. Idiocy. The GOP is the only party in the modern world that doesn't believe in global warming. A greedy, arrogant, brainwashed disgrace and disaster, now imploding. Change the channel..
 
These arguments crack me up.

Its almost as though people believe that by the power of their arguments either for or against the concept of global warming, that event will or will not happen.


There isn't a sole posting here with the scientific background to post anything worthy of our consideration, regardless of what you might think about the issue.

And the truly amusing part of your acts is that you get ANGRY with those who disagree!

As though your righteous anger can somehow effect reality.
 
These arguments crack me up.

Its almost as though people believe that by the power of their arguments either for or against the concept of global warming, that event will or will not happen.


There isn't a sole posting here with the scientific background to post anything worthy of our consideration, regardless of what you might think about the issue.

And the truly amusing part of your acts is that you get ANGRY with those who disagree!

As though your righteous anger can somehow effect reality.


How about ignorance and denial. Will those change reality?
 
These arguments crack me up.

Its almost as though people believe that by the power of their arguments either for or against the concept of global warming, that event will or will not happen.


There isn't a sole posting here with the scientific background to post anything worthy of our consideration, regardless of what you might think about the issue.

And the truly amusing part of your acts is that you get ANGRY with those who disagree!

As though your righteous anger can somehow effect reality.

Its because for some AGW has taken the place of religion for them. Questioning it is like questioning dogma.

And I dont disagree that maybe, just maybe, there is change caused by human activity. My disagreement is that we need massive government control over every apsect of our life to "do something about it"
 
Ain't it great the way the Pub Propaganda Machine organizes, spins, and blows out of proportion all this BS for you, hater dupes? This has happened, the new ice age was a prediction for the future that never happened. Idiocy. The GOP is the only party in the modern world that doesn't believe in global warming. A greedy, arrogant, brainwashed disgrace and disaster, now imploding. Change the channel..

Isn't it like an arrogant Liberal to tell others what they can or can't believe. Tell you chit is bad for you and that they are saving us from ourselves.....................Then say they are about FREEDOM AND LIBERTY.

LOL

All the BS that the left has been pushing for hasn't happened. The same ones said we'd have an ICE AGE. Said we'd be underwater by now, but they can't show the GREAT WATER INCREASES they said WOULD DOOM US. aka The Sky is falling BS.

Imploding......................

LOL

Everywhere your mindset is the deal the city or State is IMPLODING. Detroit and California being prime examples. WHY DID EVERYONE LEAVE......................Why the massive DEBTS when these are the examples of LIBERAL UTOPIA.....................

You can't fix Stupid. I gave up on your kind long ago. Have a happy meal at double the price and get back to me.
 
These arguments crack me up.

Its almost as though people believe that by the power of their arguments either for or against the concept of global warming, that event will or will not happen.


There isn't a sole posting here with the scientific background to post anything worthy of our consideration, regardless of what you might think about the issue.

And the truly amusing part of your acts is that you get ANGRY with those who disagree!

As though your righteous anger can somehow effect reality.

Arrogant post...............

aka If your not a Scientist you have no business posting an opinion.

LOL

There are many scientist who agree and many who disagree.

Pick a side or Shut up.
 
It has NOTHING to do with science.

You don't come up with a CONCLUSION first, and then cherry pick data to support it.

That's what global warming is, and it's unfetterd bullshit.
 
These arguments crack me up.

Its almost as though people believe that by the power of their arguments either for or against the concept of global warming, that event will or will not happen.


There isn't a sole posting here with the scientific background to post anything worthy of our consideration, regardless of what you might think about the issue.

And the truly amusing part of your acts is that you get ANGRY with those who disagree!

As though your righteous anger can somehow effect reality.

That is why most of us post links to those who supposedly do know and then comment on what we think of the information. Most of us can read, rationalize and make decisions based on what we have learned. It doesn't take a degree in climitalogy to see that the experts used to call for a ice age and now they call for global warming. Matter of fact all it takes is age and believe me I lived through both hypes. Why they do this fear mongering is beyond me.

The Earth is not warmer then it has been in the past that is known. So why does anyone think that warmer is bad? What should the temperature be? All I ever get out of GW fearists is colder. So what if the Northwest passage opens in the Artic that is a boom for mankind. So what if a few polar bears lose their habitat evolution had been going on since the dawn of time, according to science. Adapter or die.

Most of all I look outside. It is definitely not warmer this year then last. I can't remember when I thought about wearing a jacket on any day in July. Went to a water park the other day and it was too cold for these old bones. The point is my CLIMATE has not changed one bit. It might be argued that the WEATHER may have changed but the weather has never been allowed to be used as an argument against GW.
 
Any Carbon Taxes you would pay would go to one of the Carbon Exchanges that Al Gore owns, as well as many Banks.
 
tHERE IS NO ARGUMENT, EXCEPT IN THE usa, THANKS TO THE pUB pROPAGANDA mACHINE, bIG oIL, AND THE kOCH bROS. tHE ONLY SCIENTISTS AGAINST IT ARE BOUGHT OFF CHARLATANS. dER. (ooops)
 
tHERE IS NO ARGUMENT, EXCEPT IN THE usa, THANKS TO THE pUB pROPAGANDA mACHINE, bIG oIL, AND THE kOCH bROS. tHE ONLY SCIENTISTS AGAINST IT ARE BOUGHT OFF CHARLATANS. dER. (ooops)

You sir, are an idiot.
 
gore_farm_sm.jpg


(disclaimer, that may not be a picture of the actual house)

House #1 A 20 room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than ! the ave rage American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern "snow belt" area. It's in the South.

bush_ranch_sm.jpg


House #2 Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds ; geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer! The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.

True according to Snopes:

snopes.com: A Tale of Two Houses
 
Back
Top Bottom