Climate Activists Step Up Calls for Imprisoning Climate Realists

[Sunsettommy]

I see that after I ran Tommy of his other thread by pointing out his Stalinist hypocrisy, he just started another thread on the same topic. So, I'll have to do it again. You know, point out what a Stalinist hypocrite Tommy is, concerning how he tried to get Dr. Mann and other climate scientists sent to the gulag for the crime of doing science. And how he has no regrets over doing so, and how he'd do it again.

Almost all the deniers here are hardcore Stalinists. They want scientists imprisoned for doing science. They'd all dearly love it if TheParty ruled absolutely. They wish they could even get non-scientists like me imprisoned for the crime of independent thinking.

You? "Independent thinking"? What a laugh. Mann fabricated his data and for that reason, refused the court order to turn over his raw scientific data in a lawsuit. He is a charlatan and you call him a "scientist." About like Al Gore is a "scientist."

theglobalwarmingfraud

TheGlobalWarmingFraud.wordpress.com

Dr. Willie Soon's lecture can be seen therein, along with many others, including Nobel Laureate in Physics, Ivar Giaever, who also rejects the Climate Change Fraud.

The Keeling Curve Fraud along should be enough to convince any thinking person of AlGorian lies and misrepresentations which are costing taxpayers trillions of dollars around the globe. Not that the Climate Change Sharia cares one bit.....

The mamooth turd completely ignored Mann's defiance of TWO different Judicial decisions, refused a discovery request in court, that the bald headed freak pay up as ordered, that he ignored the findings of the North Report and the Wegman report, he also ignored the M and M 2005 expose of that garbage HS paper.

Mamooth has to be paid, since, no one is naturally that stupid.

 

[mamooth]

What a laugh. Mann fabricated his data and for that reason,

Given that no deniers have ever been able to point to any such fabricated data, it's clear that you're pushing another denier fraud there.

He is a charlatan and you call him a "scientist."

Yu're jsut a propaganda scientist who fails hard at every aspect of science, so you're not qualified to judge actual science.

Dr. Willie Soon's

Dr. Willie Soon is a very well paid denier fraud. Follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money goes to your side, which is why all of the fraud and crap science comes from your side.

including Nobel Laureate in Physics, Ivar Giaever,

A man who fails hard at climate science. I am much smarter than he is on this topic. And I can prove it. Summarize one of his arguments, in your own words, and I'll show you why it's stupid.

The Keeling Curve Fraud

Cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, cuckoo, ....

Go on, tell us more. In your own words, describe this "fraud". This should be hilarious.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Given that no deniers have ever been able to point to any such fabricated data,

Given that he's refused a court order to turn it over......you're surprised? DURR

 

[Sunsettommy]

Given that no deniers have ever been able to point to any such fabricated data,

Given that he's refused a court order to turn it over......you're surprised? DURR

He is never surprised, because he is a robot who was so perfectly programmed (brainwashed) that he doesn't know what independent thinking is.

 

[mamooth]

The mamooth turd completely ignored Mann's defiance of TWO different Judicial decisions, refused a discovery request in court, that the bald headed freak pay up as ordered,

Even if that fantasy was true, it would in no way excuse you for being a Stalinist ratfuk who wants to jail scientists for doing any science which is inconvenient to TheParty.

that he ignored the findings of the North Report

The report that said Mann was right? You don't seem quite sane there.

and the Wegman report,

The report commissioned by Republican politicians to confirm Republican political opinions? Yeah, that's reliable. Plus, there was the matter of it being shit science. The random data it fed in to "always get hockey sticks" wasn't random. Wegman faceplanted hard.

he also ignored the M and M 2005 expose of that garbage HS paper.

M&M 2005 was just rehashed in the Wegman report, which was why the Wegman report was crap.

Basically, you're screaming that scientists are frauds who need to go to jail if they don't parrot your cult's bad propaganda papers. And that's why you look so Stalinist.

 

[mamooth]

Given that he's refused a court order to turn it over......you're surprised? DURR

Who told you such a stupid thing, and why did you believe it?

Come on, turn down the Stalinism just a little. Just because your authoritarian masters tell you to repeat something stupid, your'e not required to do it.

If you don't want to come across as a cult fraud, you need to demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. Given that all his data is in the public domain -- despite your Stalinist lies to the contrary -- that shouldn't be a problem for you, if you're not lying.

That goes for all of you deniers. If you're not outright frauds, you should be able to specifically demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. If you are outright frauds, you'll run now, screaming insults to cover your retreat.

You'll all run now, because you are frauds, and you've always run every time before. You have to. Disavowing your cult's fraud would get you kicked out of your cult. And to sheep like deniers, banishment from the herd would be like a death sentence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Given that he's refused a court order to turn it over......you're surprised? DURR

Who told you such a stupid thing, and why did you believe it?

Come on, turn down the Stalinism just a little. Just because your authoritarian masters tell you to repeat something stupid, your'e not required to do it.

If you don't want to come across as a cult fraud, you need to demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. Given that all his data is in the public domain -- despite your Stalinist lies to the contrary -- that shouldn't be a problem for you, if you're not lying.

That goes for all of you deniers. If you're not outright frauds, you should be able to specifically demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. If you are outright frauds, you'll run now, screaming insults to cover your retreat.

You'll all run now, because you are frauds, and you've always run every time before. You have to. Disavowing your cult's fraud would get you kicked out of your cult. And to sheep like deniers, banishment from the herd would be like a death sentence.

Who told you such a stupid thing, and why did you believe it?

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’ Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination. Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S.

Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann | Principia Scientific Intl.

Prominent climate alarmist Michael Mann shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender climate data for open court examination, committing contempt of court.

principia-scientific.org

If you have a source that shows he did turn over the data...post it.

Given that all his data is in the public domain

You should tell the judge, quick, before Mann loses his case(s).

If you're not outright frauds, you should be able to specifically demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud.

Gladly, as soon as he turns it over. LOL!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Given that he's refused a court order to turn it over......you're surprised? DURR

Who told you such a stupid thing, and why did you believe it?

Come on, turn down the Stalinism just a little. Just because your authoritarian masters tell you to repeat something stupid, your'e not required to do it.

If you don't want to come across as a cult fraud, you need to demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. Given that all his data is in the public domain -- despite your Stalinist lies to the contrary -- that shouldn't be a problem for you, if you're not lying.

That goes for all of you deniers. If you're not outright frauds, you should be able to specifically demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud. If you are outright frauds, you'll run now, screaming insults to cover your retreat.

You'll all run now, because you are frauds, and you've always run every time before. You have to. Disavowing your cult's fraud would get you kicked out of your cult. And to sheep like deniers, banishment from the herd would be like a death sentence.

Who told you such a stupid thing, and why did you believe it?

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’ Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination. Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S.

Fatal Courtroom Act Ruins Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann | Principia Scientific Intl.

Prominent climate alarmist Michael Mann shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender climate data for open court examination, committing contempt of court.

principia-scientific.org

If you have a source that shows he did turn over the data...post it.

Given that all his data is in the public domain

You should tell the judge, quick, before Mann loses his case(s).

If you're not outright frauds, you should be able to specifically demonstrate Mann's supposed fraud.

Gladly, as soon as he turns it over. LOL!

Mann has already LOST two cases, refuses to comply with the presiding TWO Judges ordering Mann to pay up.

That is what mamooth is defending

 

[mamooth]

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’

You're quoting a kook greenhouse-effect denier website. PSI is the craziest of the crazy. Even WUWT banned mentioning them for a while, until WUWT went insane with Stalinism and started accepting anything that helped them hate.

And you were unable to demonstrate any fraud by Mann. As expected, being that you just made up that claim.

All of the deniers know they're pushing a fraud here. They push it anyways, because they don't have the guts to say "no" to their cult. The cult tells them to lie, so they lie. That's why most everyone correctly initially assumes that anything any denier says is probably a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Deniers have earned their reputation for dishonesty.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’

You're quoting a kook greenhouse-effect denier website. PSI is the craziest of the crazy. Even WUWT banned mentioning them for a while, until WUWT went insane with Stalinism and started accepting anything that helped them hate.

And you were unable to demonstrate any fraud by Mann. As expected, being that you just made up that claim.

All of the deniers know they're pushing a fraud here. They push it anyways, because they don't have the guts to say "no" to their cult. The cult tells them to lie, so they lie. That's why most everyone correctly initially assumes that anything any denier says is probably a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Deniers have earned their reputation for dishonesty.

You're quoting a kook greenhouse-effect denier website.

OMG!

If you have a better source that shows he turned over the data.....maybe that he won the lawsuits.....

POST IT!!!!!

 

[Sunsettommy]

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’

You're quoting a kook greenhouse-effect denier website. PSI is the craziest of the crazy. Even WUWT banned mentioning them for a while, until WUWT went insane with Stalinism and started accepting anything that helped them hate.

And you were unable to demonstrate any fraud by Mann. As expected, being that you just made up that claim.

All of the deniers know they're pushing a fraud here. They push it anyways, because they don't have the guts to say "no" to their cult. The cult tells them to lie, so they lie. That's why most everyone correctly initially assumes that anything any denier says is probably a lie, unless independent evidence indicates otherwise. Deniers have earned their reputation for dishonesty.

You're quoting a kook greenhouse-effect denier website.

OMG!

If you have a better source that shows he turned over the data.....maybe that he won the lawsuits.....

POST IT!!!!!

Notice how he is ignoring Dr. Mann's failed two lawsuits, and the Judges order that he pay up?

He concentrates on the word FRAUD, but he ignores the fact that both of his failed lawsuits are indeed a form of fraud. He deliberately drags the lawsuits out for years for the singular purpose of running them down. DR. Ball won because DR. Mann sat on his lawsuit, didn't proceed with his lawsuit which was 8 years old when Ball send a request to the judge shut the lawsuit down.