pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 82,663
- 33,575
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #1,381
I think we agree they need to have a list of rules/ethics and they can not break those rules. If they do they have to go.
Lower courts have these rules and they are bound by them. The Supreme's don't. This is one of the examples that prove this system we have is rigged. Like the electoral college or how a senator of a small state has just as much power as a senator who resides in a much bigger state. How the fuck do the Supreme Court justices not have rules they have to follow?
And another thing. Appointed for life? How about we cut that to 10 years. A lot can change in a country in 20 years. What if we appointed a 30 year old KKK judge in 1963? He'd be a 90 year old judge still on the bench. And before you think that's a stretch. remember RBG was 87 and still on the court.
We aren't going to appoint a 30 year old judge. The part I would hate about changing out judges is that the parties push awful candidates and then argue "well what about the courts"?
Last thing I want to do is help them with their lousy picks.