Citizenship test for Muslims.

There is no widespread Christian Nationalist movement in the U.S.
You said they "want our domestic laws enforced." This study examines the relationship between Christian nationalism—a political theology and cultural framework that seeks to amalgamate the Christian faith and a country's political life and privilege Christianity in the public square over other faith traditions—and attacks against religious minorities in the United States. Some Christian nationalists believe that it is justifiable to undertake violent actions in order to realize the goals of Christian nationalism. We theorize that the political empowerment of Christian nationalist ideology in the form of politicians expressing Christian nationalist sentiments corresponds to physical attacks on religious minorities carried out by self-professing Christians. We test this theory using a cross-sectional, time-series analysis of antiminority violence in the United States. The results provide robust support for our theory.

There is no widespread movement among Muslims to establish Sharia law in the US.
 
I agree that trump should not have pardoned the J6 rioters convicted of violent crimes.
Thats what all you got out of my post? You arent here to discuss. You are here to obsess about trump. Weirdo.
 
Q. "Would you defend the First Amendment 'freedom of religion' clause against the imposition of Sharia Law?"


We need a citizenship test for Zionists like you.
 
Try asking that question to your fellow Christian Nationalists who want to impose their version of what you call Shari'a if they were Muslims.
What is a “Christian nationalist”, and where would I find one?
 
You do not assimilate into a western nation AND maintain Sharia. One is not compatible with the other.
 
Some Jewish communities have Halakik mediation for settling civil disputes between community members where a rabbi or rabbis will give a scripturally compliant response to the dispute.

This is binding only as far as it is a condition to participate in that community and it never applies to criminal offenses.

I have no issue with The Muslim community doing the same as long as participation remains voluntary and it does not extend the the non-Muslim or Muslims who choose not to participate.
 
Q. "Would you defend the First Amendment 'freedom of religion' clause against the imposition of Sharia Law?"


Why would they think they have to defend against fundie Islam when christians here are not expected to defend against fundie christianity?
 
Why would they think they have to defend against fundie Islam when christians here are not expected to defend against fundie christianity?
Little known fact. The founders didn't anticipate foreign religions. Freedom of religion was meant to address differences in denominational Christianity. Strange that while the SCOTUS always seeks to "understand the intentions" of the founders they miss this one by a mile.
 
Try asking that question to your fellow Christian Nationalists who want to impose their version of what you call Shari'a if they were Muslims.

Wrong, they would want our laws to be imposed......not sharia law. You're a liberal hack so Im not surprised in your response.
 
Little known fact. The founders didn't anticipate foreign religions. Freedom of religion was meant to address differences in denominational Christianity. Strange that while the SCOTUS always seeks to "understand the intentions" of the founders they miss this one by a mile.
America today would terrify the Founding Fathers. Armed troops roam the streets of major cities, masked government agents arrest people without probable cause and disrupt the public speech that the president hates and fears, and the president kills foreigners on the high seas whom he says might commit crimes should their small speedboats miraculously make it 1,500 miles to the United States.
What the Founders Feared - LewRockwell
 
The ugly face of Islam hides behind the smiley face of Muslim women.
You hate exactly what the elite tell you to hate.

Think for yourself for once.

East Germany has been reborn here. That’s just what the Founders feared most.
 
15th post
I have no issue with The Muslim community doing the same as long as participation remains voluntary and it does not extend the the non-Muslim or Muslims who choose not to participate.

Here is how you impose Sharia Law without imposing Sharia Law


The US city run by Muslim Americans​


"Friction arose in 2004 following a vote to broadcast the Islamic call to prayer in public. Some residents have argued that a ban on bars near mosques hurts the local economy".

 
Back
Top Bottom