Funny I don't remember the crazy left being so very worried about the emoluments clause or whether Carter was devaluing or overinflating any of his property.
Show one instance where you can prove that any of his losses were by properties that he had full control of.
Do you have definitive proof that he was not devaluing or inflating properties that he did not have full control of? It could very well be that he was adjusting for how he felt those that were in charge of the property were doing in financial decisions at the time.
He licencsed his name, he bought properties with other partners. Not really a bad tactic to let partners run a company that losses money then later purchase that property at the current reduced cost. All you have to do is then run it properly so it begins making money.
So a hotel needs to close down just so you can feel oh so safe. Why were the crazy left not yelling for the Clinton foundation to close down when foreign dignitaries were placing millions in it when she was Secretary of State? why when there were allegations of donations made for Huracane victims that never actually made it to them? Was it simply because of the democrat designation?
Wait a second... so he is a great businessman when he says so and is getting elected, but when it is found out he lost over a BILLION dollars over those years, it is because he didn't have full control over the business? You do know that when Trump's name gets branded on a property or golf course, he's getting paid for that... at no sot to him. They are paying HIM to be able to use his name.
"Trump Ocean Club isn’t the only property bearing the Trump moniker that’s struggled financially this year. Trump International Golf Club in Puerto Rico
filed for bankruptcy in July after accumulating tens of millions of dollars in debt.
It wasn’t a bankruptcy for Trump himself; in fact, he made money on the deal. He licensed his name without risking any capital in the property itself."
Donald Trump's Real Secret To Riches: Create A Brand And License It
You do realize that you actually did not address anything that I posted? Or is it that you had nothing but bull?
I covered EXACTLY what you said. You want to give excuses that Trump was losing money on businesses he wasn't controlling on his own. That's bullshit, and as I pointed out to you VERY clearly, a lot of his income comes from licensing THE TRUMP NAME ONLY, for income, with ZERO capital risk to it. ZERO.
Once again you did not answer any of it, YOU chose to bring up the licensing of his name I was talking about such things as Trump tower where he and others were involved. Where did you talk about why not one of you on the crazy left were screaming about emulments when Carter was in office? Where did you mention anything about caring about the Cinton foundation?
Love the bob and weave that you are hoping to pull off.
Well first off, I'm not on the left. Secondly when Carter was in office I was 5 years old when he left office.
It is quite funny you are talking shit about Carter when he is one of the most down to Earth Presidents of ALL-TIME. He's 94 years old and STILL helping build houses for Habitat for Humanity, and he STILL LIVES in a house worth only $167,000. You need to pick better battles.
Former President Jimmy Carter lives in a $167,000 house and shops at the Dollar General
I've said from the very beginning that I think the Clintons are shady. I've seen several people like you make this strawman argument and I will make you the same offer.
BET ME, LOSER LEAVES FORUM FOREVER... show ONE POST that I said I supported Clinton as President and voted for him or her. ONE POST. Either put up or shut up. If I supported either of them it should be pretty easy to find ONE POST out of my 21,000+ right?
You guys are all the same. Make statements and won't stand behind them.