No, we're saying we already take better care of them than the government does.
The SCOTUS interprets the Constitution, not you. As I posted, the SCOTOUS interpreted Articles lll and IV as implying the powers and authority 223 years ago that you are denying and failing to recognize. 223 years of SCOTUS examinations, reviews and rulings have confirmed the decision made 223 years ago. 223 years of Congresses and Presidents have affirmed the decision and failed to challenge the ruling and the rulings that confirmed it at least 176 times. That means multiple SCOTUS rulings for 223 years have confirmed the interpretation made in 1794 to be Constitutional. But what did they know, some internet poster on a message board disagrees with them.
Bullshit. Our constitution was created so it didn't need interpretation.
Bull shyt. The wording is in the Constitution. You just choose denial as your defense. Just because you do not understand Article lll and lV doesn't mean they are not part of the Constitution. It just means you don't understand them or your denial won't let you affirm them.
He went from it being IN the Constitution to it being done by the Court itself.
Bull shyt. The wording is in the Constitution. You just choose denial as your defense. Just because you do not understand Article lll and lV doesn't mean they are not part of the Constitution. It just means you don't understand them or your denial won't let you affirm them.
He went from it being IN the Constitution to it being done by the Court itself.
You are totally ignorant about the Constitution. The Founders knew a body, entity, would have to be assigned to interpret the Constitution and laws. It was so important to them that they made the SCOTUS and equal branch of government whose specific task was to interpret.
EVERYBODY's refrigerator was one of those. You see, when your power goes out in August, and it sits there in New Orleans heat and now it's October and it's still hot and you still have no power, what you do is seal up the doors and haul it outside. You don't even open the damn thing; it's unhealthy. EVERYBODY had to ditch their fridge whether their home was flooded or not. Because of the lack of electrical power.
Matter of fact I have a pic of that.
Here's what a street in Mid-City looked like in October, after paths had been plowed through the debris. This neighborhood was under eight feet of water. The expression on the car says it all.
I found it was easier than I expected to upload these photos, so I made an album out of them which you can peruse and point your finger and giggle how people "deserved it".
Let's do one more. Look at this building -- this is another part of town (Carrollton):
See that perfectly-straight line where the building stops? That's where the water was when it was burning, and that's why it burned down to a level line. That's another effect of a flood --- when there's water everywhere no fire department can get to anything, so it just burns down to the water on its own.
Here's the effect of that heat on the stop sign at the corner of that street:
What caused the lack of electrical power? Could it have been flooding?
Usually wind. Downed trees and such. Exploding transformers.
Are you saying flooding couldn't have caused transformers to explode? Trees to fall? That's strange. I didn't think water and electricity mixed well. I've seen the wind blow and blow like a turbine and my neighbor's 40' pine tree remain up. However, when the wind blew AND heavy rains came like pouring piss out of a boot occurred, down it went.
The Constitution gives the SCOTUS the authority to interpret the Constitution and laws. Once it rules the ruling itself comes becomes constitutional. That is a basic that you can't seem to understand. The 1794 SCOTUS interpreted Articles lll and lV as giving implied authority to SCOTUS via Articles lll and IV. The ruling has been held as Constitutional for 223 years. Exact wording that you are demanding is not necessary to make the ruling constitutional. The court ruling and interpretation itself makes the ruling constitutional. The SCOTUS interpretation is the only one that is recognized. Your interpretation means nothing.
Lol. Shut up, commie. Your sole purpose is to subvert, pervert, and destroy the constitution.
EVERYBODY's refrigerator was one of those. You see, when your power goes out in August, and it sits there in New Orleans heat and now it's October and it's still hot and you still have no power, what you do is seal up the doors and haul it outside. You don't even open the damn thing; it's unhealthy. EVERYBODY had to ditch their fridge whether their home was flooded or not. Because of the lack of electrical power.
Matter of fact I have a pic of that.
Here's what a street in Mid-City looked like in October, after paths had been plowed through the debris. This neighborhood was under eight feet of water. The expression on the car says it all.
I found it was easier than I expected to upload these photos, so I made an album out of them which you can peruse and point your finger and giggle how people "deserved it".
Let's do one more. Look at this building -- this is another part of town (Carrollton):
See that perfectly-straight line where the building stops? That's where the water was when it was burning, and that's why it burned down to a level line. That's another effect of a flood --- when there's water everywhere no fire department can get to anything, so it just burns down to the water on its own.
Here's the effect of that heat on the stop sign at the corner of that street:
What caused the lack of electrical power? Could it have been flooding?
Usually wind. Downed trees and such. Exploding transformers.
Are you saying flooding couldn't have caused transformers to explode? Trees to fall? That's strange. I didn't think water and electricity mixed well. I've seen the wind blow and blow like a turbine and my neighbor's 40' pine tree remain up. However, when the wind blew AND heavy rains came like pouring piss out of a boot occurred, down it went.
I'm not "saying" I know what caused any particular transformer to explode, nor did I see any do that since I wasn't there. Again --- learn to read. See the word "usually"? That means it's speculation based on past experience.
I also happen to know that transformers are mounted way higher than eight feet, consistently, so no I have no reason to speculate flooding went that high. I have however seen high winds, with or without flooding or even rain, snap trees off, drop power lines and cause it that way. Including here in the forest.
Since you apparently know as much about trees as you don't about electricity, and at the risk of overfilling an obviously taxed cranial capacity, you might be amazed to learn that some trees bend with the wind and others do not. It's the latter that tend to snap.
Then of course there's lightning. And tornadoes commonly spawned by a hurricane. Those also damage electrical systems.
Dumbass.
EVERYBODY's refrigerator was one of those. You see, when your power goes out in August, and it sits there in New Orleans heat and now it's October and it's still hot and you still have no power, what you do is seal up the doors and haul it outside. You don't even open the damn thing; it's unhealthy. EVERYBODY had to ditch their fridge whether their home was flooded or not. Because of the lack of electrical power.
Matter of fact I have a pic of that.
Here's what a street in Mid-City looked like in October, after paths had been plowed through the debris. This neighborhood was under eight feet of water. The expression on the car says it all.
I found it was easier than I expected to upload these photos, so I made an album out of them which you can peruse and point your finger and giggle how people "deserved it".
Let's do one more. Look at this building -- this is another part of town (Carrollton):
See that perfectly-straight line where the building stops? That's where the water was when it was burning, and that's why it burned down to a level line. That's another effect of a flood --- when there's water everywhere no fire department can get to anything, so it just burns down to the water on its own.
Here's the effect of that heat on the stop sign at the corner of that street:
What caused the lack of electrical power? Could it have been flooding?
Usually wind. Downed trees and such. Exploding transformers.
Are you saying flooding couldn't have caused transformers to explode? Trees to fall? That's strange. I didn't think water and electricity mixed well. I've seen the wind blow and blow like a turbine and my neighbor's 40' pine tree remain up. However, when the wind blew AND heavy rains came like pouring piss out of a boot occurred, down it went.
I'm not "saying" I know what caused any particular transformer to explode, nor did I see any do that since I wasn't there. Again --- learn to read. See the word "usually"? That means it's speculation based on past experience.
I also happen to know that transformers are mounted way higher than eight feet, consistently, so no I have no reason to speculate flooding went that high. I have however seen high winds, with or without flooding or even rain, snap trees off, drop power lines and cause it that way. Including here in the forest.
Since you apparently know as much about trees as you don't about electricity, and at the risk of overfilling an obviously taxed cranial capacity, you might be amazed to learn that some trees bend with the wind and others do not. It's the latter that tend to snap.
Then of course there's lightning. And tornadoes commonly spawned by a hurricane. Those also damage electrical systems.
Dumbass.
But you're refusing to admit it could have been flooding. I've seen transformers do that when flooded.
Transformers for underground power are 8 feet above ground?
I know trees bend. I watched the one that fell bend in the wind and fall in less wind and high levels of water.
Then of course there's flooding that you have already determined couldn't have caused it despite not being there to see.
