.
Remember Tim Walz celebrated Chinese communism where “. . . everyone is the same and everyone shares." “The doctor and the construction worker make the same. The Chinese government and the place they work for provide housing and 14 kg or about 30 pounds of rice per month. They get food and housing."
Walz stated the above to his students during a lesson on China’s communist system in November 1991. LINK
To the contrary, here in the United States, our system is designed to protect the inalienable right of our citizens to pursue their own happiness, and for each to succeed or fail by their own doing and choices. The magic of the great wealth produced under America’s system, as opposed to that of China and other socialist/communist systems, is found upon a self-evident principle which rewards the industrious, protecting and allowing each to enjoy the fruits of their own labor. While under China’s communism, and other such oppressive systems, the ambitious are stifled where “. . . everyone is the same and everyone shares", except for China’s rules who live large off the backs of those who are governed.
And that appears to be the attraction to communism by its promoters like Walz and Mamdani who embrace a China type system where government controls almost every aspect of the people's lives while folks in control of government live large off the backs of those who produce wealth, while rulers distribute, with an iron fist, the wealth which labor has produced.
If Mamdani was concerned about the families in NYC that are barely making ends meet, he would advocate exempting them from paying NYC's tax on their earned wages. Instead, he wants to keep them financially dependent upon government for their subsistence, so he wont exempt them from a tax on the bread they have earned by the sweat of their labor. That is what all socialist/communists do . . . keep a voting block dependent on government by any means necessary.
Do the voters in NYC really understand what Mamdani is advocating?
.
Remember Tim Walz celebrated Chinese communism where “. . . everyone is the same and everyone shares." “The doctor and the construction worker make the same. The Chinese government and the place they work for provide housing and 14 kg or about 30 pounds of rice per month. They get food and housing."
Walz stated the above to his students during a lesson on China’s communist system in November 1991. LINK
To the contrary, here in the United States, our system is designed to protect the inalienable right of our citizens to pursue their own happiness, and for each to succeed or fail by their own doing and choices. The magic of the great wealth produced under America’s system, as opposed to that of China and other socialist/communist systems, is found upon a self-evident principle which rewards the industrious, protecting and allowing each to enjoy the fruits of their own labor. While under China’s communism, and other such oppressive systems, the ambitious are stifled where “. . . everyone is the same and everyone shares", except for China’s rules who live large off the backs of those who are governed.
And that appears to be the attraction to communism by its promoters like Walz and Mamdani who embrace a China type system where government controls almost every aspect of the people's lives while folks in control of government live large off the backs of those who produce wealth, while rulers distribute, with an iron fist, the wealth which labor has produced.
If Mamdani was concerned about the families in NYC that are barely making ends meet, he would advocate exempting them from paying NYC's tax on their earned wages. Instead, he wants to keep them financially dependent upon government for their subsistence, so he wont exempt them from a tax on the bread they have earned by the sweat of their labor. That is what all socialist/communists do . . . keep a voting block dependent on government by any means necessary.
Do the voters in NYC really understand what Mamdani is advocating?
.