Chew On This

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rationalists9

Guest
when a short, dark haired, moustached German did it in the 40's it was called GENOCIDE but when a cockeye, oil hungry red neck does it, it's called DISARMEMENT!!!!!!!
 
You're completely wrong. We're deposing a tyrant to give MORE freedoms. Hitler WAS a tyrant.
 
uh lesseee here.........

Camps,
Ovens,
Gas,

NOT

RWA don't waste keystrokes on idiots. Oh wait, I just did. Better luck next time
 
Jews Suffer Genocide; Whites Accept Diversity

by D.W.
June 3, 2002

For the racial activist and denier of racial difference alike, the fact of mass racial killing cannot be dismissed. Whether one steadfastly seeks to prevent it as the culmination of all that is immoral or accepts it as an unpleasant but perhaps inevitable part of racial struggle, there it looms, providing a clue to why calm discussions of racial difference or White racial solidarity prompt Jewish, black and Hispanic hysterics.

It has happened countless times throughout history, in varying degrees, since the races first came face to face. The example we're most often presented with -- to the exclusion of all others, naturally -- is the killing of Jews by Hitler's forces during World War II. Not for no reason does "the Holocaust" spring to everyone's lips when asked for an example of genocide, and silence fall when they're asked for a second.

Genocide, as mass racial killing is sometimes called, means "the killing of a people." The concept is held aloft in our society as an unimaginable horror, the darkest propensity of humankind, condemned by the nations of the world in international declarations and likely a fair number of racialists as well. It doesn't sound like a day at the beach to me, either, but no honest racialist can avoid facing the issue, as J.R. Colson explained in a recent VNN piece.

Before collapsing to the ground in anguish or jumping for joy at the thought, however, some words of caution -- beginning with an examination of the word itself -- are in order. Powerful as the images evoked may be, "genocide" is, first and foremost, a word. Like "racist," "bigot," "anti-Semitic," "Nazi" and "hate," it is a word cultivated more carefully than petunias in the Negev desert, used to trigger Pavlovian reactions in the reader or hearer. Women faint, men leap to their feet, and old folks clasp their hands over their mouths. Without fail, the word is deployed to undermine White racial survival. Like any word used in a political context, its use is often selective.

Consider the following examples:

When Jews are killed, it's genocide all right, and so much more: it's The Holocaust, complete with velvet-pillow article "the" and a big, towering capital H. Mere genocide is reserved for lesser peoples, like, say, the East Timorese. Unlucky for them, they weren't chosen by God.

But...

When Palestinians are killed, it's called Israel's Right to Defend Herself.

When Red Indians are killed, it's called Making a Home in the New World.

When Germans are killed, it's called Making the World Safe for Democracy.

When Japanese are killed, it's called Necessary Action to End the War.

When Iraqis are killed, it's called Liberating Kuwait.

When Afghans are killed, it's called Fighting the War on Terrorism.
Lastly...

When Whites are killed, it isn't called anything.

That's because Jews have trained the camera away from the slow suffocation of Whites, fixing it instead on their own racial cause.

Which, upon reflection, is its own form of genocide -- genocide by mind control and deft political manipulation. Genocide can take many forms. A race need not be rounded up and shot in the street to be dispensed with, as the Jews have discovered. Its members need not even be physically killed. Jews understand that they don't have the numbers or the guns to battle the White race for dominance in military fashion. But they do have the media, the law, public schools, places of higher learning and the government, all firmly under their control, and it is through these institutions that "genocide" has come to mean the evil actions of Whites against other races -- to the point where "unequal" funding of public schools is Whites' "genocide" of blacks.


It is through these same institutions that Jews further the genocide of Whites, robbing them of community, destiny and heritage and leaving them to wander as dispossessed shells in the land their ancestors founded. The sheer genius of it is that they need not lift a finger to do so. With a mere piece of paper declaring that non-White immigration will be the law of the land, they chisel the crack in the dam keeping the White race safe and dry.
 
Originally posted by rationalists9
when a short, dark haired, moustached German did it in the 40's it was called GENOCIDE but when a cockeye, oil hungry red neck does it, it's called DISARMEMENT!!!!!!!


Does what?
 
:trolls:

I see way too many people pop on the board and make some wild rhetoric like this, and everybody either jumps on him, or uses it as an opportunity to sneak in their own crazy rhetoric. When will we learn to ignore these guys unless they talk intelligently.
 
I don't know if it's jew related or not. But there is racism going on against whites. It's called affirmative action.
 
Originally posted by rationalists9
when a short, dark haired, moustached German did it in the 40's it was called GENOCIDE but when a cockeye, oil hungry red neck does it, it's called DISARMEMENT!!!!!!!

Do you know how offensive it is for you to write such nonsense? Both of my grandfathers faught against Germany in WWII. Hitler was the cruelest person to ever exist. He ordered the deaths of millions. And his army killed hundreds of thousands of Americans.

For you to compare George Bush and our war in Iraq to that is just inane. How many people have we executed? Answer: none. Yes, there have been casualties. But there always are in war. But it isn't the same thing. Genocide and war casualties. Don't ever confuse the two again. You sick, sick puke.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top