Checked for Truth or.....

[Vrenn]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

 

[Concerned American]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

Damn, then we would have a truly conservative forum. Not one that values free speech, but only conservative posts would be here.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Oddball]

Damn, then we would have a truly conservative forum. Not one that values free speech, but only conservative posts would be here.

No we wouldn't...We'd have Commiecrat Underground 2.0.

 

[lennypartiv]

Damn, then we would have a truly conservative forum. Not one that values free speech, but only conservative posts would be here.

Exactly. All the dishonest Dem posts about 2020 would have been deleted.

 

[Oddball]

Exactly. All the dishonest Dem posts about 2020 would have been deleted.

All the Covington kids threads got disappeared, when it became clearly evident that the moonbats had thoroughly embarrassed themselves.

 

[Crepitus]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

All the tRumplings would leave the forum.

 

[TheYellowKing]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

Yeah sure bud, cause that worked so well during covid. Why are you in favor of giving approved opinions to people with an agenda?

 

[Vrenn]

Yeah sure bud, cause that worked so well during covid. Why are you in favor of giving approved opinions to people with an agenda?

Both sides would have to pass the Factcheck. Whatsamadder, you can't meet that criteria?

 

[WinterBorn]

So this new forum would have to have every thread "fact checked" by moderators?

Yeah, that would work. Like mods have nothing better to do than clicking links on threads.

 

[1srelluc]

The way it looks there's not enough mods left here to kill dupes....Much less fact check.

 

[AyeCantSeeYou]

It isn't the mods' job to fact check; that's up to the members.

 

[TheYellowKing]

Both sides would have to pass the Factcheck. Whatsamadder, you can't meet that criteria?

And who would be the factchecker?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Both sides would have to pass the Factcheck. Whatsamadder, you can't meet that criteria?

it is a proven fact that almost all fact check sites are left wing and wouldn't know the truth if it shit down their throats.

 

[Libby von H]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

THat would have 3 regrettable results though some form that didn't have these faults might be good

1) The greatest conviction attaches to what necessarily can have no check. FIrst Principles. All men are created equal.
stephen in his cornerstone speech ingited the Civil war by claiming the opposite. It is by its obviousness uncheckable

2) Better to say 'If it is false' because that means something is based on something.

3) By my reckoning most of what I object to on here is from BAD WILL and not BAD INTELLECT though a bad will does decay your truth faculties. To say anything true or false using filthy language should bar one.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

NFW!

 

[Delldude]

I would like to see a truth checked area where if it isn't true, it has to be either removed or deleted. This would have to be verified in one of the factche3ck sites by an Admin of some kind.

You Jamie Raskin's boy?

 

[rippy38]

Both sides would have to pass the Factcheck. Whatsamadder, you can't meet that criteria?

The biggest question is, who gonna fact check the fact checkers?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Wouldn't it just be easier to create some software that reverses all the decisions of the moderators, here, in regard to what they send to conspiracies and what they allow to remain in place?

 

[Meister]

Both sides would have to pass the Factcheck. Whatsamadder, you can't meet that criteria?

I'm glad fact check sites have no agenda.