Signatures praising Hitler, avatars with Hitler, swastikas, etc…..

[BackAgain]

STFU

Suck another bag of dicks, you perpetual fail.

By the way, semen breath, you’re also off topic entirely.

I guess that’s why you appeared your useless demand that I shut up. You can’t debate on the topic at all.

Sucks to be you.

 

[1srelluc]

The avie is not of the actor. The avie is of the character he played in one movie.

And if this Board (for some mindless reason) determined that any image of “Blutarsky” was forbidden, that would be one of their terms and conditions. I’d either abide by it or leave.

I’m really unclear about the hub bub. I frankly have no particular desire to use the N word. I also have no desire to use a swastika as an avie.

I get that but just saying that if the OP started ranting about it, I'd be saying the same thing in your defense.

 

[okfine]

Suck another bag of dicks, you perpetual fail.

By the way, semen breath, you’re also off topic entirely.

I guess that’s why you appeared your useless demand that I shut up. You can’t debate on the topic at all.

Sucks to be you.

As usual you cry. You should quit acting like a whiny assed bitch and go away.

 

[BackAgain]

I get that but just saying that if the OP started ranting about it, I'd be saying the same thing in your defense.

Her complaint here isn’t a rant.

And you’d be free to disagree.

Nevertheless, if USMB (the entity) can ban the use of the N word (for reasons of sensitivity to offense racist terms), then it can just as well ban an avie depicting the Nazi swastika (also for reasons of sensitivity).

And, bottom line, if it chooses to do so (for purposes of consistency) it is allowed to do so. It can also decline the request. The only thing confronting management at that point would be the underscoring of the different rationals for those different determinations.

 

[BackAgain]

As usual you cry. You should quit acting like a whiny assed bitch and go away.

Stop your own crying and take your own hike.

As for me, your application is denied and I’ll remain here and will continue to point out your lies, hypocrisy and your stupidity and your lack of logic.

And if you don’t like it, rough shit.

The OP makes a fair case.

 

[Captain Caveman]

…..really should be forbidden from this site. Whatever happened to the proclamation that USMB would have a low tolerance for antisemitism? The mods will delete anything they deem racist, yet allow the antisemites to throw the most disgusting venom in Jews’ faces.

Please reevaluate your double standards and make some adjustments.

The Swastika is not Nazi, they just used the symbol that's several thousand years older than the Nazis'.

 

[Lisa558]

At least the top antisemite is now gone.

I don’t think so.

 

[Lisa558]

The Swastika is not Nazi, they just used the symbol that's several thousand years older than the Nazis'.

Oh please. The swastika is indelibly linked to the most horrific antisemitism ever to befall the Jewish people, and the sight of it is HIGHLY offensive to Jews.

Only an antisemite would argue that the swastika should be allowed on a site that claims to be intolerant of antisemitism.

You another Brit?

 

[Lisa558]

hmmm, imagine if that applied to everyone and not just the jewish posters.

That’s the point, isn’t it? Different standards for the Jews.

 

[Lisa558]

I have run into that creature, too.

Me three.

 

[sparky]

I have no clue what happened.

a double standard Lisa

I’m pointing out the double standard to mods.

I'm pointing one out to you......

~S~

 

[Captain Caveman]

Oh please. The swastika is indelibly linked to the most horrific antisemitism ever to befall the Jewish people, and the sight of it is HIGHLY offensive to Jews.

Only an antisemite would argue that the swastika should be allowed on a site that claims to be intolerant of antisemitism.

You another Brit?

10,000 years BC ?

Are the Nazis that old?

It's like saying ban the Rainbow because of the Transgender movement, but the rainbow was known many thousands of years before the present day illness.

Yes, I'm a Brit, so you will get accurate history from me. If it's specific Nazi colours, then put your request in. But the Swastika as a symbol predates Hitler.

 

[BackAgain]

The Swastika is not Nazi, they just used the symbol that's several thousand years older than the Nazis'.

Of course it’s a Nazi symbol.

Stop the silly semantics.

 

[rightwinger]

But the Swastika as a symbol predates Hitler.

And since Hitler, the Swastika has taken on a specific meaning

 

[log cabin republican]

It's easy to identify a weak person by the way he/she reacts to criticism, adversity, misfortune, obstacles, or failure. The weak person blames others. She looks at her demographics and then adopts the collectivist attitude. The weakling says her failure is due to others reaction to her race, religion, etc.

The strong person does the opposite. The strong person looks inward. She sees her own failing heart, attitude, etc. and vows to make herself better. Just look around the world and identify the successful people.

OP, maybe people just don't like you because of you.

I also laugh at how so-called "conservatives" have become the crybabies. It's notable that the liberals on these threads are not the ones crying.

 

[okfine]

Stop your own crying and take your own hike.

As for me, your application is denied and I’ll remain here and will continue to point out your lies, hypocrisy and your stupidity and your lack of logic.

And if you don’t like it, rough shit.

The OP makes a fair case.

Definition of DESPICABLE

deserving to be despised : so worthless or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

That would be you

 

[BackAgain]

Definition of DESPICABLE

deserving to be despised : so worthless or obnoxious as to rouse moral indignation… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

That would be you

Poor widdle fume is crying again.

And the poor befuddled libtard is also off topic. It is still just trolling.

Cry harder. It can’t undercut your complete lack of credibility any worse. You have no credibility.

 

[Roy C]

Geez, cut the crap already. Almost everyone here knows the op is posting on behalf of an organization. These ADL-like organizations do this all over the internet.

They have extensive youtube vids that they widely promote. They have a presence on reddit, quora, facebook, yahoo, and many others. And yes, most of these outlets are small, but they add up when you use a lot of them.

I’ve personally seen it, with some users postings on multiple platforms. I know one guy who dedicates part of his work-office time to such activity. Some people do this while retired.

The reason the op is complaining is because these ADL-like organizations want to control as much social media as possible. Her fervent efforts are painstakingly attempting to promote the mission of these control freaks. (There’s a black poster here who does the same thing for another type of group.)

She plants her playbook vocabulary in many many posts, no matter how irrelevant. You could be discussing cheese sandwiches, and she’ll find a way to tell you that you’re anti-jew. No average person is going to act like this posting on a forum. These people are sick control freaks.

 

[okfine]

Poor widdle fume is crying again.

And the poor befuddled libtard is also off topic. It is still just trolling.

Cry harder. It can’t undercut your complete lack of credibility any worse. You have no credibility.

Definition of LOATHSOME

giving rise to loathing : disgusting… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

and #5 combined

Definition of CREEP

to move along with the body prone and close to the ground; to move slowly on hands and knees; to go very slowly… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com