- Moderator
- #201
Well, you better get on the phone with Chauvin‘s lawyers and let them know that.How stupid are you ? The "verdict" you cite of course is invalid, having been gotten from perjuries.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, you better get on the phone with Chauvin‘s lawyers and let them know that.How stupid are you ? The "verdict" you cite of course is invalid, having been gotten from perjuries.
So you haven't yet heard about >You do spout some bullshit doncha big fella
So you haven't yet heard about >
![]()
Over a dozen current and former officers say they believe MPD's Katie Blackwell perjured herself during Derek Chauvin trial AlphaNews.org
Fourteen current and former MPD officers say they believe MPD Assistant Chief Katie Blackwell perjured herself during Derek Chauvin's trial.alphanews.org
![]()
EXCLUSIVE: 5 years later: Justice after George Floyd? The dismissed lawsuit revealing the truth—and Derek Chauvin's response | AlphaNews.org
Liz Collin reveals what went on behind Katie Blackwell's dismissed defamation lawsuit. Former MPD officers speak out—including Derek Chauvin.alphanews.org
![]()
Newly Released Documents Suggest Coercion in the George Floyd Case » The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics
On July 29, District Court Judge Peter Cahill ordered that a key exhibit requested by the attorneys for former Minneapolis police officer Tou Thao be madespectator.org
![]()
Judge dismisses Katie Blackwell's defamation lawsuit against Alpha News, reporter Liz Collin AlphaNews.org
Judge Edward T. Wahl dismissed the defamation lawsuit filed by Katie Blackwell against Alpha News, senior reporter Liz Collin, and others.alphanews.org
You do spout some IGNORANCE doncha ?
When you don't know anything about a topic, you shoudn't be posting.Well, you better get on the phone with Chauvin‘s lawyers and let them know that.
IF Only todays garden variety Dimocrat could impregnate thatWhen you don't know anything about a topic, you shoudn't be posting.
So now you’re anti-death penaltyOdd. If you really look. The same people that say Chauvin is guilty because the jury said so are the same ones who oppose the death penalty because juries are sometimes wrong.
Are you? Why?So now you’re anti-death penaltyy
That’s new
So now you’re anti-death penalty
That’s new
Um pardon me Moi.Do they { Who Day } even make Dodge
I have no idea.Um pardon me Moi.Do they { Who Day } even make Dodge
cars/vehicles any more.
I have no idea.![]()
Are you? Why?
After having met more than my share of killers, my opinion is that those who kill for enjoyment should get the death penalty, quickly. Appeals aren't necessary. Everyone else deserves a shot because juries are screened to allow dimwits and are easily controlled.I am. I believe no one has the right to take the life of another outside of self defense.
You seem to believe juries can get it wrong but still support the death penalty.
Regardless of how anyone "feels" about what happened - Chauvin's conviction was a political hit. PERIOD.Elon Musk floats possible pardon of ex-cop Derek Chauvin for being 'unjustly convicted' in George Floyd case | Daily Mail Online
By STEPHENM. LEPORE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
Elon Musk weighed on a movement to pardon former police officer Derek Chauvin, saying the controversial action was 'something to think about.'
Chauvin, the disgraced Minneapolis cop convicted of murdering George Floyd back in 2020, is currently serving concurrent state and federal sentences in a federal prison in Arizona.
Ben Shapiro's The Daily Wire has begun an effort to pardon Chauvin with an open letter to Donald Trump, calling his conviction 'the defining achievement of the Woke movement in American politics.'
Comment:
The medical examiner testified that Chauvin did not harm Floyd.
He also testified that Floyd had arterial sclerosis, covid-19 and a lethal amount of fentanyl in his blood.
It was a politically motivated conviction.
It was a bogus conviction and an injustice.
After having met more than my share of killers, my opinion is that those who kill for enjoyment should get the death penalty, quickly. Appeals aren't necessary. Everyone else deserves a shot because juries are screened to allow dimwits and are easily controlled.
How did you get to that conclusion?So the possibility of a jury getting it wrong really isn't a concern for you.
How did you get to that conclusion?
Those who get enjoyment out of killing should be taken out in the parking lot immediately after verdict and done right there.Your words. Guilty? Kill em.