Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

I emailed Chauvin's attorneys early on. I'm older than Floyd was, heavier, less fit.

I volunteered for them to cuff me (for the sake of a demo for court) and watching the video, put a knee on my ******* neck, for the same times and durations they did Floyd and I guarantee you that I would survive.

Why?

Because I have no drugs in my system.

I wish they would haven taken me up on it.
Again....very complex. I am not going to litigate here.

I admire police for putting up with this crap.

But we have a system. And it convicted him.

In this case....the shooter will be looking down the business end of 4 or 5 rifles.
 
I'm seeing this quote "It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the 2nd Amendment".....this is what Kirk said.

We all know no one would say such a thing if they thought the live lost would be their own. He ultimately died for what he believed in, access to firearms. The 2nd Amendment remains undefeated.
Everyone is taking that quote out of context and NOT sharing the who video.
 
Again....very complex. I am not going to litigate here.

I admire police for putting up with this crap.

But we have a system. And it convicted him.

In this case....the shooter will be looking down the business end of 4 or 5 rifles.
I don't want to reargue that shit anyway.

That said, I still would like to know what level of shit it would take to get otherwise restrained Conservatives from reacting like the protesters did over Floyd.
 
It can be said somewhere else. It’s disgusting correct. Vile inhumane and yep, free speech, so is mine, point is that, they want us silent

Yep, we get to counter with ours

Yep, you also have the right to your own free speech, but in a free speech society, you have to accept the speech of others, even as much as you may hate it. If you dont, then we dont practice the values we preach.
 
Everyone is taking that quote out of context and NOT sharing the who video.
I don't know what context can possibly change the meaning of that quote. He is saying what a lot of people believe, that yes, there will be gun deaths. He's right, there will be when everyone has access to a firearm, just like people will die when everyone has a drivers license.

But none of us want to be in the path of someone looking at their phone, or some nutjob on a shooting spree.
 
I'm seeing this quote "It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the 2nd Amendment".....this is what Kirk said.

We all know no one would say such a thing if they thought the life lost would be their own. He ultimately died for what he believed in, access to firearms. The 2nd Amendment remains undefeated.

He was assassinated because no one on the left was at his level intellectually.
He believed in free speech and debating of ideas.
 
I don't want to reargue that shit anyway.

That said, I still would like to know what level of shit it would take to get otherwise restrained Conservatives from reacting like the protesters did over Floyd.
It's getting close.

All that needs to happen is for someone like Schumer to bad mouth Kirk and he'll have a full blown riot on this hands.
 
He was assassinated because no one on the left was at his level intellectually.
That's not true, and his intellectual prowess is not well known, at least to me.

A deranged lunatic killed him, not "the left". In fact, you don't have a clue what the shooters beliefs are.
 
1757559850409.webp
 
I'm seeing this quote "It's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the 2nd Amendment".....this is what Kirk said.

We all know no one would say such a thing if they thought the life lost would be their own. He ultimately died for what he believed in, access to firearms. The 2nd Amendment remains undefeated.

I keep seeing people bring this up, and I just heard a pretty interesting take on it

 
That's not true, and his intellectual prowess is not well known, at least to me.

A deranged lunatic killed him, not "the left". In fact, you don;t have a clue what the shooters beliefs are, so you are clearly not an intellectual.
He was good.

He was also practiced.

And he didn't yell or scream at people.
 
15th post
He was talking about exactly what happened.

Karma.
Aaand no, its not what you suggest. If you watch the video, you'd see he was suggesting that ALL freedoms have a cost associated with them, and we dont take them away because of that cost.

He mentions that there are over 50,000 automobile deaths per year. Would you suggest we take away cars? If you say "no" then you are saying the exact thing kirk was trying to convey.

You all would try and suggest kirk was glorifying gun deaths and being cavalier about people getting shot. That wasnt it. He was simply trying to say that, unfortunately, all freedoms have a cost.
 
I keep seeing people bring this up, and I just heard a pretty interesting take on it


You guys might want to recall that plenty of people died so you could have a Constitution and a Bill of Rights. That includes the 2nd amendment.

Was that "worth it"?
 
Yep, you also have the right to your own free speech, but in a free speech society, you have to accept the speech of others,
I don’t have to accept it at all. Again, they have a right to be inhumane in speech, but son, I do not have to accept it! Fk that
even as much as you may hate it. If you dont, then we dont practice the values we preach.
I can counter their crap, my free speech
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom