I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what if that's not what happened?I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
And what if that's not what happened?
So basically, you’d be cool with a murderer being given a reduced sentence provided he confesses in a manner that aligns with your politically motivated speculationI would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
So as long as he repeats the propaganda you want him to say, you'll allow him to live? Sounds like the same choice John McCain was given in the Hanoi Hilton.I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
In Utah the have a choice of lethal injection or firing squad. Never mind, a toilet flushed is a toilet flushed.Nope, execution by firing squad.
I'd be okay if they gave him a plea deal if he would confess that Charlie faked his death and ran off to Thailand for gender reassignment surgery. As long as he never sees freedom, I don't much care how we get there.I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
Folks....Here we have an other Fascist who wants to shut down the free press. The media did not incite him by telling the truth, Kirk incited him with his lies.I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?
"Ready, aim ... " Phone rings! "It's the governor saying he is not going to give you a reprieve! Fire!"No Monte Hall here. He gotta go. Maybe give him an execution date, let him take the walk, and then postpone it. Do that about a dozen times before he finally gets it.
Sorry to use a big word like "testify." It means giving evidence in court.So as long as he repeats the propaganda you want him to say, you'll allow him to live?
My evidence Trump started all this in 2016In Utah the have a choice of lethal injection or firing squad. Never mind, a toilet flushed is a toilet flushed.
WTF are you talking about? You're almost as weird as you are gay.My evidence Trump started all this in 2016
Hillary Clinton hit back at Donald Trump on Wednesday, saying his comment that “Second Amendment people” may be the only ones who could stop Clinton from nominating liberal justices to the Supreme Court “crossed the line.”
“Words matter, my friends, and if you are running to be president or if you are president of the United States, words can have tremendous consequences,” HILLARY said at a rally in Iowa. “Yesterday, we witnessed the latest in a long line of casual comments from Donald Trump that crossed the line.
Nope. No deal.I would be OK with a plea deal to spare Charlie Kirk's killer the death penalty if he would agree to testify that he was incited by the major media outlets, who could then be criminally prosecuted for conspiracy to commit murder. What say you?