'
Well, Ram, you have proved that there are plenty of other people who believe blithering nonsense.
But we already knew that, didn't we?
.
What we know is you have no explanation for prophecy, other than to say it isn't humanly possible, and yet there it is. All emanating from the same source.
And again, you deflect right over it into meaningless character assassination. You're no challenge.
All of the gospels were written before the destruction of the temple, which is why none of them document the destruction, one of the biggest events in the history of Israel, just predict it.
Explain this:
The date of the Gospel of Luke is traditionally fixed to some time before the end of the final events of Luke's second volume to Theophilus, Acts, so as early as 59 or 60 AD.
Luke referenced the Book of Mark. The temple was destroyed in 70 AD.
Your 'after the event was prophesied' theory, simply doesn't work.
Did some one sneak and add to Isaiah and Daniel and Ezek, and Rev,
after Israel became a Nation? Reclaimed Jerusalem?
Did that person notice Israel was getting a lot more rain than it used to, so they turned the weather into a prediction and then added it to the Torah when no one was looking?
Did that person make sure to change
all of the transcripts all over the world also, so they would all match his hoax manuscripts?
And how clever would he have to be to find ancient paper, and ink to change the Dead Sea Scrolls, after he discovered them and then re hid them. Because nothing was added to them either.
The Dead Sea Scrolls date back as early as 250 B.C., but most of them date to about A.D. 50–100. The scrolls include the oldest-known copies of every book of the Hebrew Bible except Esther, as well as extra-biblical texts ranging from prayers to commentaries to hymns.
They were found before Israel became a nation in one day, and the prophesies of the prophets remained
intact without additions and
well before the events they foretold.
Daniel, (6th century
BC). predicted the temple burning and the destruction of the city. No one changed his book, or the Dead Sea Scrolls that reiterate the original.
So your explanation is invalid. It is not a viable explanation of the phenomenon of Biblical prophecy.
Most prophesies in the Bible occurred long after the prophet was dead, and his works had been distributed to to many tribes to be all altered with the same additions.
Especially the naked girl at 3:55 in the vid.
