Central Park goes more than 650 days Without an Inch of Snow — nearly Doubling the Record

After 701 days, New York City finally sees at least an Inch of Snow in a Day


Residents across The Bronx and New York City woke up this morning to a city blanketed in light snow with an inch of accumulation since midnight and finally ending the Longest Dry-spell of significant snow in history falling in a single day.

It’s hard to believe but the last record of significant snow accumulation was February 13, 2022 when 1.6 inches of snow
was recorded in Central Park.


The 701 day streak shattered the previous record which was broken on March 21, 1998 when the city went just over a year with 400 days without significant snow recorded.



`
Wooow...waaaay back in 1998. So much for the "world is ending soon!" nonsense.
 

After 701 days, New York City finally sees at least an Inch of Snow in a Day


Residents across The Bronx and New York City woke up this morning to a city blanketed in light snow with an inch of accumulation since midnight and finally ending the Longest Dry-spell of significant snow in history falling in a single day.

It’s hard to believe but the last record of significant snow accumulation was February 13, 2022 when 1.6 inches of snow
was recorded in Central Park.


The 701 day streak shattered the previous record which was broken on March 21, 1998 when the city went just over a year with 400 days without significant snow recorded.



`
actually, it is not hard to believe that a city warmed by the ocean, gets no snow

you are a complete moron
 
actually, it is not hard to believe that a city warmed by the ocean, gets no snow

you are a complete moron
Except it's a record and hasn't happened in at least 140 years.

So You're the Moron.

`
 
Oct 25, 2023 — June, July, August, September and (very probably) October were the warmest respective months since records began.

Warmest in a few hundred years.

$76 trillion!!!
Annoyed you Baiting Turd?
ALL you DO IS Bait peope.
WTF!

SO.....
the "$76 Trillion" TrollsterParrot posts daily has NO Current basis.
It's a 14 Year Old estimate!

(2011)

New Pricetag for Going Green: $76 Trillion | National Review

So says the noted climate-denial body located on New York City’s East River. Dan Gainor: Two years ago, U.N. researchers were claiming that it would cost “as much as $600 billion a year over the ne…[/quote

Solar (and on-shore wind) has come Down in price 90%.
See my other OPs on renewables.
-
`
I am only posting this 5% of thetimes you did.
`
 
IMG_4591.webp
 
So, 140 years ago it happened as well.
Do you understand yet why you are an idiot?

All my life, I have seen record random variations. Record rain, record snowfall, record drought, record heat and cold. Many random variables combine in innumerable ways so that on occasion, they all sync up to create big events, just as on rare occasions, rogue waves spontaneously appear in the ocean 200-300% higher than normal waves. Places routinely see weather and climate they never saw before in recorded history and were caught totally unprepared.

But if any of this is due to man-made climate change, beyond about 150 years ago, there simply was not enough people doing enough industry to yet impact the planet in any way, not even in theory.

Add to that the hysteresis of the event that it would take time before the effects of it began to become pronounced, further shortening the time window of such events to at best, maybe the last 75 years? Then consider that the historical record shows that such variations occurred (and with more severe swings) millions of years ago too.

Finally, arguing an event from 140 years ago, that amounts to about 0.00000003125% of the history of the Earth. That is much like trying to judge the quality of a Mozart concerto from hearing 0.25 seconds of the composition.

Put all these facts together and it proves that abu afuk is a blooming idiot.
 
All my life, I have seen record random variations. Record rain, record snowfall, record drought, record heat and cold. Many random variables combine in innumerable ways so that on occasion, they all sync up to create big events, just as on rare occasions, rogue waves spontaneously appear in the ocean 200-300% higher than normal waves. Places routinely see weather and climate they never saw before in recorded history and were caught totally unprepared.

But if any of this is due to man-made climate change, beyond about 150 years ago, there simply was not enough people doing enough industry to yet impact the planet in any way, not even in theory.

Add to that the hysteresis of the event that it would take time before the effects of it began to become pronounced, further shortening the time window of such events to at best, maybe the last 75 years? Then consider that the historical record shows that such variations occurred (and with more severe swings) millions of years ago too.

Finally, arguing an event from 140 years ago, that amounts to about 0.00000003125% of the history of the Earth. That is much like trying to judge the quality of a Mozart concerto from hearing 0.25 seconds of the composition.

Put all these facts together and it proves that abu afuk is a blooming idiot.

Careful ... you're using college science and that'll get Abu really upset ... we don't want another crying spell now do we? ...

Over 6,000 weather station, a "100-year event" occurs 60 times a year ... even Abu's statistics is wrong ... very sad ... I hope he doesn't start crying over high school math ...

Hey Abu ... "inertia" ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...
 
When was the last time Central Park had a thousand feet of ice covering it?
 
  • Brilliant
Reactions: JBG
Is snow important?
 
Back
Top Bottom