CDC whistleblower exposes vaccine autism link

[John T. Ford]

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

And, on the other hand ....

The evidenced that vaccines did cause autism, was hidden by the CDC.

And, now we are suppose to trust the CDC during this pandemic?

 

[esalla]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

 

[Lewdog]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

 

[esalla]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

Tell the judge and jury kid, because I was not involved in the suit

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

Got that dopey

 

[Lewdog]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

Tell the judge and jury kid, because I was not involved in the suit

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

Got that dopey

Did you click on the link in your own post??? Jesus...

 

[esalla]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

Tell the judge and jury kid, because I was not involved in the suit

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

Got that dopey

Did you click on the link in your own post??? Jesus...

$1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit

The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from...

www.huliq.com

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

 

[Lewdog]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

Tell the judge and jury kid, because I was not involved in the suit

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

Got that dopey

Did you click on the link in your own post??? Jesus...

$1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit

The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from...

www.huliq.com

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

CLICK ON THE LINK NUMB NUTS.

The link does not exist. I provided a screen shot of it.

 

[esalla]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

You do studies to see if it CAUSES autism, which they did and found it didn't. They didn't do studies to prove the negative. If you are going to wade into this at least know how doing studies works.

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

You keep saying "they." A "whistle-blower" does not speak for the entire CDC, and they could not be telling the truth.

The CDC has been repeatedly questioned on the link between autism and vaccines for at least 2 decades, they (the CDC) always said that the evidence of their studies disproved any link to autism. Now they (the CDC) have been forced to admit in federal court that they (the CDC) had no studies disproving the autism link which is extraordinary at least and evidence of domestic terrorism proving the CDC as an anti American terrorist organization who experimented on humans like Dr. Mengele of Nazi lore

You need help. Like most conspiracy theory people, you connect dots that aren't there.

Tell the judge and jury kid, because I was not involved in the suit

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

Got that dopey

Did you click on the link in your own post??? Jesus...

$1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit

The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from...

www.huliq.com

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award
The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.
In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

CLICK ON THE LINK NUMB NUTS.

The link does not exist. I provided a screen shot of it.

Just shows that the government is continuing to hide the truth

There are thousands more links that do work, like this one

Federal vaccine court quietly pays out billions

Medical experts say the vaccine court has played a crucial role in safeguarding public health

www.salon.com

Federal vaccine court quietly pays out billions


Payouts by the national Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or VICP, have now topped $4 billion.


A branch of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the program has adjudicated vaccine injury and death claims for three decades while rarely drawing much attention.

One of the reasons the court works in obscurity is that vaccines provide vast public health benefits, and authorities are reluctant to point to the rare cases where they lead to harm out of fear that the information will dissuade people from being immunized.

Yet the program’s payouts to those injured and their attorneys have mounted since the late 1980s, when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act set up the vaccine court as an alternative to lawsuits for people seeking compensation for adverse reactions to vaccines. Payments—which surpassed $4 billion by Dec. 1, according to data from the federal Health Resources & Services Administration—come from a trust fund supplied by a surcharge on vaccines.

 

[Markle]

The autism rate in America is skyrocketing. It is up 30,000 percent since the early 1980’s, now affecting 1 in 36 children (between 3 and 17 years of age). And the CDC has indeed “fraudulently managed” the data — senior CDC researcher Dr. William Thompson and his team found a strong association between vaccines and autism, but did as their bosses told them and changed the parameters of the study to get rid of the association, so the CDC would not have to report it to the public.

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

Esalla admits that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies cause autism.

LOL the courts have already found that vaccines cause autism, did you spend much on law school to become this morbidly stupid?

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.

In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

LOL the courts have already found that vaccines cause autism

The courts? Not science? DURR

'Vaccine Court' Awards Millions to Kids With Autism But Won't Admit the Truth

Huh? But I thought they just said there was no link between ... wait, I'm confused. If vaccines don't cause autism, why did the government pay millions of dollars to autistic kids as compensation for vaccine injury? I'm no expert, and there's not a ton of information out there on these particular cases (because access to medical records has been blocked from public view), but I'm wondering if this doesn't all boil down to a system of semantics designed to protect the medical powers-that-be.

Parenting, Baby Names, Celebrities, and Royal News | CafeMom.com

thestir.cafemom.com

Yawn, actually it is common in lawsuits that the loser, the CDC would not admit guilt but agree to compensate the victim.

So expect another trillion dollars to be paid out to the families of children with autism.

Life is good for those who protect the truth

Now pay off your loans already doofus

But I thought they just said there was no link between

It was probably all the mercury that wasn't in the vaccines, eh?

The autism rate in America is skyrocketing. It is up 30,000 percent since the early 1980’s, now affecting 1 in 36 children (between 3 and 17 years of age). And the CDC has indeed “fraudulently managed” the data — senior CDC researcher Dr. William Thompson and his team found a strong association between vaccines and autism, but did as their bosses told them and changed the parameters of the study to get rid of the association, so the CDC would not have to report it to the public.

The CDC has lied about vaccines and autism for 14 years. Let’s put a stop to it!

🖨️ Print post We’ve been notified that Mark Green has added to his previous statement referenced to below, and as such, we will update our action alert shortly! […]

www.westonaprice.org

Your own radically biased source does NOT provide a source for that outrageous claim of a 30,000% increase in the autism rate since the '80s.

Why Are the Numbers Rising?
Is the rapid increase in the incidence of autism real or apparent? Could ongoing changes in the way autism is described and diagnosed be to blame? This is an ongoing controversy, with strong advocates on both sides—but most people in the scientific community believe that the incredibly fast increase in autism prevalence is, at least in part, a bit of an illusion. Here are just a few reasons why the numbers should be taken with a grain of salt:

• The CDC reports on the prevalence of autism are based entirely on parent reports and not on medical records. Parents were asked "whether children ever received an ASD diagnosis by a care provider," not whether the diagnosis was verified or whether the child still qualified for the diagnosis.
• Most of the children whose parents say they have a diagnosis of autism are from relatively wealthy, white, educated, married parents living in a major metropolitan area. These facts suggest a possible cultural or socioeconomic bias in reporting and/or diagnosis.
• An older Danish study looking into the question concluded: "Changes in reporting practices can account for most (60 percent) of the increase in the observed prevalence of ASDs in children born from 1980 through 1991 in Denmark. Hence, the study supports the argument that the apparent increase in ASDs in recent years is in large part attributable to changes in reporting practices."

Is Autism Really on the Rise?

Since the early 1990s, rates of autism have starte to rise. Are rates really increasing, or are other factors responsible?

www.verywellhealth.com

 

[esalla]

The autism rate in America is skyrocketing. It is up 30,000 percent since the early 1980’s, now affecting 1 in 36 children (between 3 and 17 years of age). And the CDC has indeed “fraudulently managed” the data — senior CDC researcher Dr. William Thompson and his team found a strong association between vaccines and autism, but did as their bosses told them and changed the parameters of the study to get rid of the association, so the CDC would not have to report it to the public.

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

Esalla admits that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies cause autism.

LOL the courts have already found that vaccines cause autism, did you spend much on law school to become this morbidly stupid?

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.

In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.

Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism Court Award

Family of Hannah Poling will Receive More than $1.5 Million in Just the First Year for her Life Care, Lost Earnings, and Pain and Suffering.

www.cbsnews.com

LOL the courts have already found that vaccines cause autism

The courts? Not science? DURR

'Vaccine Court' Awards Millions to Kids With Autism But Won't Admit the Truth

Huh? But I thought they just said there was no link between ... wait, I'm confused. If vaccines don't cause autism, why did the government pay millions of dollars to autistic kids as compensation for vaccine injury? I'm no expert, and there's not a ton of information out there on these particular cases (because access to medical records has been blocked from public view), but I'm wondering if this doesn't all boil down to a system of semantics designed to protect the medical powers-that-be.

Parenting, Baby Names, Celebrities, and Royal News | CafeMom.com

thestir.cafemom.com

Yawn, actually it is common in lawsuits that the loser, the CDC would not admit guilt but agree to compensate the victim.

So expect another trillion dollars to be paid out to the families of children with autism.

Life is good for those who protect the truth

Now pay off your loans already doofus

But I thought they just said there was no link between

It was probably all the mercury that wasn't in the vaccines, eh?

The autism rate in America is skyrocketing. It is up 30,000 percent since the early 1980’s, now affecting 1 in 36 children (between 3 and 17 years of age). And the CDC has indeed “fraudulently managed” the data — senior CDC researcher Dr. William Thompson and his team found a strong association between vaccines and autism, but did as their bosses told them and changed the parameters of the study to get rid of the association, so the CDC would not have to report it to the public.

The CDC has lied about vaccines and autism for 14 years. Let’s put a stop to it!

🖨️ Print post We’ve been notified that Mark Green has added to his previous statement referenced to below, and as such, we will update our action alert shortly! […]

www.westonaprice.org

Your own radically biased source does NOT provide a source for that outrageous claim of a 30,000% increase in the autism rate since the '80s.

Why Are the Numbers Rising?
Is the rapid increase in the incidence of autism real or apparent? Could ongoing changes in the way autism is described and diagnosed be to blame? This is an ongoing controversy, with strong advocates on both sides—but most people in the scientific community believe that the incredibly fast increase in autism prevalence is, at least in part, a bit of an illusion. Here are just a few reasons why the numbers should be taken with a grain of salt:

• The CDC reports on the prevalence of autism are based entirely on parent reports and not on medical records. Parents were asked "whether children ever received an ASD diagnosis by a care provider," not whether the diagnosis was verified or whether the child still qualified for the diagnosis.
• Most of the children whose parents say they have a diagnosis of autism are from relatively wealthy, white, educated, married parents living in a major metropolitan area. These facts suggest a possible cultural or socioeconomic bias in reporting and/or diagnosis.
• An older Danish study looking into the question concluded: "Changes in reporting practices can account for most (60 percent) of the increase in the observed prevalence of ASDs in children born from 1980 through 1991 in Denmark. Hence, the study supports the argument that the apparent increase in ASDs in recent years is in large part attributable to changes in reporting practices."

Is Autism Really on the Rise?

Since the early 1990s, rates of autism have starte to rise. Are rates really increasing, or are other factors responsible?

www.verywellhealth.com

Why are the courts paying out billions of dollars

Duh because vaccines are causing all sorts of horrible diseases

Federal vaccine court quietly pays out billions

Medical experts say the vaccine court has played a crucial role in safeguarding public health

www.salon.com

 

[Markle]

Andy Wakefield?
Well, he's got all sorts of credibility, doesn't he?

The judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain damaged children seem to believe he is credible

Please help.

l must have missed your reliable source and working link showing all "the judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain-damaged children".

Would you provide that information?

 

[esalla]

Andy Wakefield?
Well, he's got all sorts of credibility, doesn't he?

The judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain damaged children seem to believe he is credible

Please help.

l must have missed your reliable source and working link showing all "the judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain-damaged children".

Would you provide that information?

Sure

• Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism ...
  
  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m
  ...
  Sep 10, 2010 · The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and ...
• $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/legal-news/
  ...
  Sep 09, 2010 · $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement Washington, DC The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autism after receiving...
  • Location: Washington, DC
• The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto ...
  
  

  The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto Dealer - KPA

  As I have been doing of late, I wanted to start my article by sending well-wishes to all our KPA clients in hopes that the unofficial start to summer will bring some much-needed sunshine on what has thus far been a gloomy 2020. Despite a global pandemic, the FTC does not appear to be slowing...

  www.kpa.io
  ...
  May 29, 2020 · The FTC and the defendants reached a $1.5 million financial settlement along with injunctive provisions designed to remedy the violations alleged in the complaint. The proposed settlement also requires a Fair Lending Program be instituted at …
  Missing:
  • autism
  Must include:
  • autism
• Poling Family Receives $1.5 Million in First Autism ...
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/
  ...
  This is a settlement for the Drugs/Medical Devices lawsuit. Washington, DC: The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autism after receiving...
• $1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit | HULIQ
  www.huliq.com/8738/15m-plus-award-vaccine-autism-lawsuit
  By Sandy Smith 2010-09-14 00:28. The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from the second year on, as long as Hannah lives.
• Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot
  
  

  Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot

  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition...

  science.slashdot.org
  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one.CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone.In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care.

Next moronic request

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Andy Wakefield?
Well, he's got all sorts of credibility, doesn't he?

The judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain damaged children seem to believe he is credible

If your science depends on jurors listening to charlatans like Wakefield, you've got a problem with science.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link

There is no "autism link".

 

[esalla]

Vaguely. What about it?

Are you in a big hurry to be a vaccine tester?

Lol have fun

They don't cause autism. So why don't you like them?

The evidence says otherwise

All the evidence of increased autism after infants were inoculated before they had an immune system points to vaccines causing autism

CDC Admits In Federal Court They Have No Evidence “Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism”
By Joe Martino
Collective Evolution
March 9, 2020

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are left to have to tell these stories, and at the same time risk more demonetization for telling the truth that the public should know. Of course, we also know that since independent media’s reach has been cut, getting stories like this out is very hard and relies on you, the dear reader, to spread the word.

As of March 2nd, 2020, the CDC has admitted in federal court that they do not have any evidence proving that vaccines given to babies don’t cause autism. For years they claimed that the studies had been done, the evidence was clear, and that there was a consensus: “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Yet, this was a lie.

An organization called the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) was instrumental in bringing forth this admission. As they stated in their own press release:

In summer 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV, as well as requesting the CDC provide studies to support the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single specific study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.

That's not how studies work... you don't try to prove a negative. No wonder you believe in this conspiracy shit.

Wrong because for the last 20 or more years the CDC has been claiming that they have studies that disprove the autism link, and now in federal court they have admitted that these studies do not exist which means they fabricated them..

The question is why?

• Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism ...
  
  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m
  ...
  Sep 10, 2010 · The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and ...
• $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/legal-news/
  ...
  Sep 09, 2010 · $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement Washington, DC The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autism after receiving...
  • Location: Washington, DC
• The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto ...
  
  

  The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto Dealer - KPA

  As I have been doing of late, I wanted to start my article by sending well-wishes to all our KPA clients in hopes that the unofficial start to summer will bring some much-needed sunshine on what has thus far been a gloomy 2020. Despite a global pandemic, the FTC does not appear to be slowing...

  www.kpa.io
  ...
  May 29, 2020 · The FTC and the defendants reached a $1.5 million financial settlement along with injunctive provisions designed to remedy the violations alleged in the complaint. The proposed settlement also requires a Fair Lending Program be instituted at …
  Missing:
  • autism
  Must include:
  • autism
• Poling Family Receives $1.5 Million in First Autism ...
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/
  ...
  This is a settlement for the Drugs/Medical Devices lawsuit. Washington, DC: The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autism after receiving...
• $1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit | HULIQ
  www.huliq.com/8738/15m-plus-award-vaccine-autism-lawsuit
  By Sandy Smith 2010-09-14 00:28. The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from the second year on, as long as Hannah lives.
• Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot
  
  

  Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot

  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition...

  science.slashdot.org
  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one.CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone.In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The CDC never did a study on autism and the vaccine so the evidence that they claimed they had was fraudulent, they admitted to this in federal court

CDC Admits in Federal Court It Has No Evidence ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ - LewRockwell

This is truly a bombshell story when you understand the full implications of it, yet major media likely will not touch it. Headlines could read “In stunning lawsuit, CDC admits they have no evidence vaccines don’t cause autism” – but instead, crickets. Independent media organizations like CE are...

www.lewrockwell.com

And, on the other hand ....

The evidenced that vaccines did cause autism, was hidden by the CDC.

And, now we are suppose to trust the CDC during this pandemic?

The evidenced that vaccines did cause autism, was hidden by the CDC.

You're lying.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Andy Wakefield?
Well, he's got all sorts of credibility, doesn't he?

The judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain damaged children seem to believe he is credible

Please help.

l must have missed your reliable source and working link showing all "the judges and juries who are awarding millions to the brain-damaged children".

Would you provide that information?

Sure

• Family to Receive $1.5M+ in First-Ever Vaccine-Autism ...
  
  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m
  ...
  Sep 10, 2010 · The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and ...
• $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/legal-news/
  ...
  Sep 09, 2010 · $1.5 Million Awarded in First Ever Vaccine Autism Settlement Washington, DC The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autismafter receiving...
  • Location: Washington, DC
• The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto ...
  
  

  The FTC Is at It Again – $1.5 Million Settlement With Auto Dealer - KPA

  As I have been doing of late, I wanted to start my article by sending well-wishes to all our KPA clients in hopes that the unofficial start to summer will bring some much-needed sunshine on what has thus far been a gloomy 2020. Despite a global pandemic, the FTC does not appear to be slowing...

  www.kpa.io
  ...
  May 29, 2020 · The FTC and the defendants reached a $1.5 million financial settlement along with injunctive provisions designed to remedy the violations alleged in the complaint. The proposed settlement also requires a Fair Lending Program be instituted at …
  Missing:
  • autism
• Must include:
  • autism
• Poling Family Receives $1.5 Million in First Autism ...
  
  https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/settlements/
  ...
  This is a settlement for the Drugs/Medical Devices lawsuit. Washington, DC: The family of Hannah Poling, a young child who at the age of 18 months allegedly developed autism after receiving...
• $1.5m-plus award in vaccine-autism lawsuit | HULIQ
  www.huliq.com/8738/15m-plus-award-vaccine-autism-lawsuit
  By Sandy Smith 2010-09-14 00:28. The family of Hannah Polling will receive $1.5 million in damages and to pay for her care in the outcome of the first-ever successful Federal lawsuit charging that a childhood vaccine caused autism. And that's just for the first year. The award also includes $500,000 for her care each year from the second year on, as long as Hannah lives.
• Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot
  
  

  Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award - Slashdot

  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition...

  science.slashdot.org
  An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one.CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone.In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care.

Next moronic request

That's not "all the judges and all the juries", that's one case.

 

[John T. Ford]

The evidenced that vaccines did cause autism, was hidden by the CDC.

You're lying.

Not my comment genius ....

It comes from a former CDC employee turned whistle blower.

But, feel free to call him a liar too .... to make sure it fits your little false reality.

 

[Markle]

Ever heard of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?

It's a government fund to compensate children who were injured as a result of vaccines.

If all vaccines are safe ..... why does this fund exist?

Simple, many people are allergic to any ingredient in that in a particular ingredient of which they or their parents are not aware of.

That fact is not the fault of the drug manufacturer, the doctor, hospital, or patient so the government provides a source of funds in order to make the victim whole.

There is no nefarious purpose to the fund.

 

[John T. Ford]

Simple, many people are allergic to any ingredient in that in a particular ingredient of which they or their parents are not aware of.

That fact is not the fault of the drug manufacturer, the doctor, hospital, or patient so the government provides a source of funds in order to make the victim whole.

There is no nefarious purpose to the fund.

Didn't say there was.

However, the fact that it exist is proof not all vaccines are safe.