CDC: Only 50,000 Died from Covid Only, Not 836,000

Well that falsehood was easily struck down:

“The length of stay data were striking:

  • the median length of stay in a nursing home before death was 5 months
  • the average length of stay was longer at 14 months due to a small number of study participants who had very long lengths of stay
  • 65% died within 1 year of nursing home admission
  • 53% died within 6 months of nursing home admission”
haha, you fool. You literally cherry picked data ONLY on those who were there for hospice. Gotdam, you people have worms in your brains.

You don't even realize the stupid thing you just did.
 
haha, you fool. You literally cherry picked data ONLY on those who were there for hospice. Gotdam, you people have worms in your brains.

You don't even realize the stupid thing you just did.


You.Are.A.Moron.

Even the CDC head has admitted that most of the dead had serious co-morbidities.

Dying WITH Covid is not the equivalent of dying OF Covid.

Your Fascist Jig is up, hence the Lefty-Prog desperation to spin up another cycle of fear over the common cold and flu season.
 
You.Are.A.Moron.

And a smelly one to boot.

Ewwwww.....
Haha, another idiot that doesn't understand what she did was stupid. Naturally.

"People in nursing homes are there for end of life care."

"No, that's stupid, not all or most nursing homes are hospice."

"Oh yeah! Well here is a link to the data only on all the people in hospice to prove you wrong!"

Fking dummies
 
Yeah, liars like to say that, when they can't support their lies. This one goes up there with "Looks like I upset you" on the troll excuse list from the first AOL chat room.


Oh, you poor widdle woo woo.

Tissue?
 
haha, you fool. You literally cherry picked data ONLY on those who were there for hospice. Gotdam, you people have worms in your brains.

You don't even realize the stupid thing you just did.
I am not in the mood to mess with you tonight FFI; I syou’re still giving Indiana a bad name.

I posted a legitimate link and the first one that popped up when I googled, “average length of time a person in the US spends in a nursing home”. Try it. Get informed and more posters will talk with you. I’ve wasting the past 18 seconds to respond so move along before you ruin another thread.
 
They didn’t withdraw its use. None of the articles address your original attempt at trying to claim that influenza cases came out as positives on COVID testing.

Wrong.
They did withdraw the PCR test.

But apparently the reason is dependent on the meaning of the word "differentiate".
And the new test they are replacing it with, will be able to detect both covid and flu.

 
How many lines of your propaganda piece do need to read before you see the extreme lefty bias in it? Let's see an objective answer to this.
You say anything that doesn’t fit your narrative is propaganda.

Your narrative isn’t based on reality. It’s just your narrative.
 
There is nothing to indicate that, at all.
In fact, after 6 months, there is no effect left from an mRNA vaccination at all.
While there’s plenty of debate about the efficacy of preventing infection, there’s basically no debate about vaccine efficacy to prevent severe COVID.
 
Wrong.
They did withdraw the PCR test.

But apparently the reason is dependent on the meaning of the word "differentiate".
And the new test they are replacing it with, will be able to detect both covid and flu.

The article does a pretty good job explaining how wrong you are. You should have read it.

They didn’t withdraw “the” PCR test. They withdrew a PCR test, the one made by the CDC. They withdrew it because there’s no need for the CDC to make a test since there’s so many commercial PCR tests.

They’re not replacing it with anything. They’re suggesting that labs switch to commercially available tests that run influenza and COVID simultaneously.

That’s it. That’s all. A bunch of liars are telling their moron followers otherwise.
 
You say anything that doesn’t fit your narrative is propaganda.
Propaganda is the systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those advocating such a doctrine or cause. This is exactly what the article you posted does. Your research will always lead you to these kinds of articles, since you can only research to support your position. You are not researching to find what the actual truth is.
 
hospitals simply allowed otherwise healthy people to die to make a political point.
No. They followed the government guidelines because the government was paying BONUSES for every Covid-related case that came through the doors. IF evidence ever comes out that these people knew that therapeutics would have saved thousands, yet refused to offer them, there should be murder charges.
 
No. They followed the government guidelines because the government was paying BONUSES for every Covid-related case that came through the doors. IF evidence ever comes out that these people knew that therapeutics would have saved thousands, yet refused to offer them, there should be murder charges.
it would be malpractice to administer drugs not approved by FDA.
 

Forum List

Back
Top