CDC Busted for inflating death numbers

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
10,328
6,734
970
No way!


Why would the CDC want to inflate numbers?
 
No way!


Why would the CDC want to inflate numbers?
so National File, I'm impressed!! Where do you guy find this kind of rags.


Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. See all Conspiracy-Pseudoscience sources.

  • Overall, we rate National File an extreme right Tin-Foil Hat Conspiracy website based on the promotion of unproven/debunked claims and a Strong Pseudoscience purveyor based on using junk science to support claims.
 
This thread belongs in the conspiracy theory section.


PCR tests not being accurate is not a conspiracy lol

It's reality

PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.

Which could have come from your doctor farting or a working filter in your nose.

And that's before we get into the absurdity of 35+ cycles and how that's too many and makes the tests useless.
 
PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.
And that test q tip came from your nose, so...

Yeah, it’s pretty sensitive.
 
No way!


Why would the CDC want to inflate numbers?

Better yet, why would national life want to spread conspiracy theories?
 
This thread belongs in the conspiracy theory section.


PCR tests not being accurate is not a conspiracy lol

It's reality

PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.

Which could have come from your doctor farting or a working filter in your nose.

And that's before we get into the absurdity of 35+ cycles and how that's too many and makes the tests useless.

AS well as a negative test does not mean you don't have it. I noticed all you clowns are eager to jump on the false positives but there are many false negatives you don't talk about.
 
No way!


Why would the CDC want to inflate numbers?
Did ANYONE not assume this to be the case?

How many people who died when herpes was out of control had herpes listed as the cause of death?
 
PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.
And that test q tip came from your nose, so...

Yeah, it’s pretty sensitive.

It also was exposed to the air, and the sensitivity is the problem you pleb.

And again just because you breathed in a bit of the virus doens't mean you have it.

Especially when you're over cycling it. We've gone from ~35 cycles to now the recommendation is 27 lol. And it should be lower. Less sesitive. More sensitive is not useful in the context of being surroudned by people who possibly have the rona. If you were the only human on earth high cycles would make sense. Not true in the contexts we test.

As you ramp up those cycles it becomes more and more likely something else contaminated the test. And less and less likely you actually have enough of the virus in you to even imagine you might have it.

Much of the "asymptomatic" shit going on isn't really asymptotic it's just overly sensitive tests. How much who knows. A test cycled 35 times is usless, and we have done tens of millions of those useless tests.
 
This thread belongs in the conspiracy theory section.


PCR tests not being accurate is not a conspiracy lol

It's reality

PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.

Which could have come from your doctor farting or a working filter in your nose.

And that's before we get into the absurdity of 35+ cycles and how that's too many and makes the tests useless.

AS well as a negative test does not mean you don't have it. I noticed all you clowns are eager to jump on the false positives but there are many false negatives you don't talk about.

True

But considering the cycles the likelyhood is minuscule

Now if we had rational cycling standards....This would become a problem.

At 35 cycles if you're not testing positive you don't have the rona

We are making the tests vastly over sensitive to combat this problem. Soooo yea i don't think you understand this fully if you believe that.
 
No way!


Why would the CDC want to inflate numbers?
And to think Cuomo The Covid Serial Killer uses the opposite way and hides bodies everywhere. Did he mention that in his new book....................I Was a Teenage Covid Killer.
 
This thread belongs in the conspiracy theory section.


PCR tests not being accurate is not a conspiracy lol

It's reality

PCR tests aren't what they have been portrayed to be. A positive PCR test doesn't mean you have the rona. It just means they found a bit of the rona on the test q tip.

Which could have come from your doctor farting or a working filter in your nose.

And that's before we get into the absurdity of 35+ cycles and how that's too many and makes the tests useless.

AS well as a negative test does not mean you don't have it. I noticed all you clowns are eager to jump on the false positives but there are many false negatives you don't talk about.
Thanks for confirming that using the PCR test was useless.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top