CBS News Legal Contributor Says It’s Not “Far-Fetched” to Argue That Jack Smith’s Hit Piece Breaches Trump’s Right to a “Fair Trial”

[Blaster]

They just keep trying to put Trump in jail or just muddy his reputation. He will win despite all these desperate measures by the Biden DOJ.

 

[otto105]

See what I mean? This was pure desperation by Chutkin.

Chutkin allowed this, she isn't fit to serve on the Federal bench.

She is a partisan, leftoid hack.

This is 100% election interference.

​

CBS News legal contributor Rebecca Roiphe said on Wednesday that arguing special counsel Jack Smith’s evidence brief breaches former President Donald Trump’s right to a fair trial is not “far-fetched” due to the documents’ level of detail.​

​

During an appearance on CBS News, the former Manhattan prosecutor discussed the “unusual” level of detail in the recent filings by Smith that could interfere with Trump’s constitutional right to a fair trial. The host asked Roiphe to delve into the evidentiary value of the documents now released to the public and explain how this might play out in a jury trial.​

​

“When there are motions, those motions become public. and those motions contain certain factual allegations. I think what is unusual here is the level of detail. Now, of course, this is an important case,” Roiphe explained. “This is responding to a ruling from the Supreme Court that was fairly vague. And so it’s not that the level of detail is inappropriate, but there is a level of detail that one doesn’t normally see in motion filings.”​

​

...​

​

“And so, you know, I think that’s worth pausing and mentioning that the former president’s argument that this was interfering with his constitutional right to a fair trial, you know, it’s not a far-fetched argument to make given how much detail is actually in there,” she continued.​

​

Judge Tanya Chutkan released Wednesday a redacted version of Smith’s detailed brief on the evidence concerning former Trump’s alleged election interference. Dismissing accusations of “bad-faith partisan bias,” Chutkan ordered the 165-page document on presidential immunity to be filed publicly, countering Trump’s legal team’s objections to its release before the election.​

​

In a Tuesday filing, Trump’s legal team accused Smith of political motives for seeking to publicize witness testimony before the election. They argued to Judge Chutkan that while prosecutors will redact names in a significant presidential immunity motion, they intend to leave quotations from sensitive materials unredacted, a reversal from Smith’s earlier stance on protecting such information to ensure justice.​

​

CBS News Legal Contributor Says It's Not "Far-Fetched" to Argue That Jack Smith's Hit Piece Breaches Trump's Right to a "Fair Trial" - 🔔 The Liberty Daily

If you love the news, check out The Liberty Daily's homepage. (DCNF)—CBS News legal contributor Rebecca Roiphe said on Wednesday that arguing special counsel Jack Smith’s evidence brief breaches former President Donald Trump’s right to a fair trial is not “far-fetched” due to the documents’...

thelibertydaily.com

You fuckup label everything as election interference. It’s laughable and only something a cult would.

Jack Smith’s filing is a direct result of the supreme court’s decision to run interference for a Fat Elvis.

Deal with it like adults.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Every maga accusation is a confession.

The American people will reject Trump.

 

[MagicMike]

So glad you asked.

Trump won in SCOTUS on immunity, he won in Florida, he'll likely have the absurd civil case in NYC brought by Letitia James reversed. And the Georgia case is basically dead.

How's that to start with?

The SCOTUS basically punted this case back down to Chutkan to make the determination of which of Trump's actions detailed in Jack Smith's indictments can be considered "official duties" and which crimes Trump committed fall outside of a POTUS' official duties.
Chutkan sent Smith back to the drawing board to rewrite the original indictment striking anything "official" like communications with his AG and DOJ and so on.
So Smith wrote up a new indictment (based upon those parameters), and presented them to a new grand jury that ultimately recommended charges again, just like the first one did.
So you see, if you were bothering to keep up with this you would know that Trump's immunity ruling from THE SCOTUS does not even apply to the new indictments. He is being charged ONLY with his crimes that cannot be construed as anything "official" that a POTUS might do.
His actions (crimes) to steal the 2020 election, according to the new charging document) were taken as "candidate Trump" and had nothing to do with a POTUS' official duties.
Do try to keep up Simp.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

MagicMike magnificently corrects Excalibur's nonsense.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Ummmm... What "hit piece"?

“Go and peacefully demonstrate” is what Trump said.

 

[excalibur]

BTW, Chutkan, an immigrant black, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, Fani Willis, summed up.


"The knowledge of books does not seem to produce any good substantial result with the Negro, but serves to sharpen his cunning, breeds hopes that cannot be fulfilled, creates an inclination to avoid labor, promotes indolence, and in turn leads to crime." ~ James K. Vardaman


For every Clarence Thomas, there's 999 of the above.