Casey Anthony

[oldsalt]

Don't post drunk.....Are you new to this?

Yeah, That coming from a dumb shit FNG with 18 posts here. ~BH

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

Don't cha know? Bullshitvik invented da internetz!!!!

 

[oldsalt]

Yeah, That coming from a dumb shit FNG with 18 posts here. ~BH

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Oh no! not deal with you!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Yoda]

Yeah, That coming from a dumb shit FNG with 18 posts here. ~BH

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Sounds like I'm getting to him? Man, not even 80 posts yet and I already own you, boy.

 

[Yoda]

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Oh no! not deal with you!!!!!!!!!!!

wait...you made a "Momma's Basement" shot too? Oh, this is great!

 

[oldsalt]

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Sounds like I'm getting to him? Man, not even 80 posts yet and I already own you, boy.

So predictable! Moving on.......

 

[oldsalt]

On topic is.....what will the defense do? Will they put Casey on the stand? that should prove quite interesting. Gee. I wonder how many will believe anything she has to say unless she just flat out confesses. And even that will be taken with a grain of salt.

I think they have to put her on.......Not sure that will go well for them, but not putting her on could spell a guilty verdict.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Believe me, you have no right to speak of originality! I'm the one standing for the law set by our founding fathers. Not just speading lies while having them in a pic as my sig like someone else around here. Here's some originality, the US Constitution. Don't pretend to know it, just read it.

Transcript of the Constitution of the United States - Official

BTW, if you don't get out of your momma' basement soon, I'll call the thought police on you!

LMAO! You are gonna lecture me on the Constitution? Bro, You are way out of your league with me in that department. I bet you have never even read it?

Like I said before to one of your other fellow morons who are defending this vermin, having an opinion that she is guilty is pretty far from wanting her executed without a trial. You're so desperate to make yourself look sane that every single one of you maggots who defend her resort to the same tactic. Face it, You're a weak minded robot slave. I bet you thought OJ wasn't guilty? Well, That is if you were even alive back then JR. ~BH

Then you would be a pathetic gambler as much as you are a patriot. I'm not defendin anyone, I'M DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION, which says she has a RIGHT to a fair trail. You are the one who's lying. You've already condemned this woman before hand. I asked you to direct me to a peice evidence from the case and all you can come up with is insults and opinion, which is fine, but but it's not fact is it?

I've already agreed with this point with you yet, you keep bring up insults and nothing more. You really need to go back and re-read the thread and the constitution. You sound dumber and dumber with each post.

Just because you're too ******* ignorant to follow a thread, that's not my fault. I guess I have to post it again for you?

Ok. All the websites that she visited (not naming them all) that were found on her hard drive. Not reporting the crime for over a month. Going out and partying like a slut during that month. The smell in her car. The tape placed on her daughters mouth. All the lies she has told, Including the nanny lie, which the change of her story into an accidental drowning clearly reveals. = LIAR. I am sure that I am missing some other things. Those are just the ones on top of my head.

Basically, Only a complete dumb shit doesn't see that she's guilty. ~BH

Let me help your weak mind out a little Yoda. Go back 3 or 4 pages and try real hard to figure it out. Here are the facts for your dumb ass.....

I answered your question to show what evidence I thought makes her look guilty. However, You're too ******* braindead to locate it because your too busy foaming out your mouth while looking for your Yoda figures lost light saber which is most likely behind your bed along with all your gay porn. You got one thing correct though. Yes, I attacked you after you drew first blood.

That's the way the world works Jr. You better learn to like it, or you will live a miserable life if and when you ever do move out of your parents house. No wonder your girl left you, you're an insecure little wormboy. You like? ~BH

 

[BolshevikHunter]

What difference does that make? Your I.Q doesn't go up with each post you make. Look at you, all those posts and stiil no smarter than your first post.

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Sounds like I'm getting to him? Man, not even 80 posts yet and I already own you, boy.

Sounds like a good story, but I guess little worm boys like yourself like to dream and act brave while sitting behind a keyboard living off of your parents. Face it, You're a cockgobbler. ~BH

 

[BolshevikHunter]

You started running your mouth first about "mommy's basement". Now you're gonna deal with me fuckO, and not just in this thread, but others now and in the future. Oh ok, I know you are but what am I? I know you are but what am I? Everything that you say bounces off of me and back to you stinky face! That better dummy? More your style? ~BH

Sounds like I'm getting to him? Man, not even 80 posts yet and I already own you, boy.

So predictable! Moving on.......

Shut up DickLip. Quit bouncing on his nutsack just because your weak minded ass needs an ally right now. Gutless and Pathetic. ~BH

 

[BolshevikHunter]

On topic is.....what will the defense do? Will they put Casey on the stand? that should prove quite interesting. Gee. I wonder how many will believe anything she has to say unless she just flat out confesses. And even that will be taken with a grain of salt.

I think they have to put her on.......Not sure that will go well for them, but not putting her on could spell a guilty verdict.

I think that they should put her on. If I ended up being convicted, I would not want to think "what if" the rest of my life. But yeah, It could get really ugly with her on the stand. I don't think that she is mentally strong enough to handle it. However, It takes someone strong to go through all of this. ~BH

 

[Yoda]

LMAO! You are gonna lecture me on the Constitution? Bro, You are way out of your league with me in that department. I bet you have never even read it?

Like I said before to one of your other fellow morons who are defending this vermin, having an opinion that she is guilty is pretty far from wanting her executed without a trial. You're so desperate to make yourself look sane that every single one of you maggots who defend her resort to the same tactic. Face it, You're a weak minded robot slave. I bet you thought OJ wasn't guilty? Well, That is if you were even alive back then JR. ~BH

Then you would be a pathetic gambler as much as you are a patriot. I'm not defendin anyone, I'M DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION, which says she has a RIGHT to a fair trail. You are the one who's lying. You've already condemned this woman before hand. I asked you to direct me to a peice evidence from the case and all you can come up with is insults and opinion, which is fine, but but it's not fact is it?

I've already agreed with this point with you yet, you keep bring up insults and nothing more. You really need to go back and re-read the thread and the constitution. You sound dumber and dumber with each post.

Just because you're too ******* ignorant to follow a thread, that's not my fault. I guess I have to post it again for you?

Ok. All the websites that she visited (not naming them all) that were found on her hard drive. Not reporting the crime for over a month. Going out and partying like a slut during that month. The smell in her car. The tape placed on her daughters mouth. All the lies she has told, Including the nanny lie, which the change of her story into an accidental drowning clearly reveals. = LIAR. I am sure that I am missing some other things. Those are just the ones on top of my head.

Basically, Only a complete dumb shit doesn't see that she's guilty. ~BH

Let me help your weak mind out a little Yoda. Go back 3 or 4 pages and try real hard to figure it out. Here are the facts for your dumb ass.....

I answered your question to show what evidence I thought makes her look guilty. However, You're too ******* braindead to locate it because your too busy foaming out your mouth while looking for your Yoda figures lost light saber which is most likely behind your bed along with all your gay porn. You got one thing correct though. Yes, I attacked you after you drew first blood.

That's the way the world works Jr. You better learn to like it, or you will live a miserable life if and when you ever do move out of your parents house. No wonder your girl left you, you're an insecure little wormboy. You like? ~BH

Your first post since I came to this thread was insults and cursing. You wanted this and baited for it, so you got it. If you can't take it, then let's get back on topic and next time, show respect and either answer the ******* question or post a different without attacking one. Save the drama for your momma. If you can't do neither, than pick a different topic, website, or log off and shut the **** up. It really is simple.

Now, back on topic. Was any DNA found on the duct tape that belonged to anyone else but the girl?

 

[oldsalt]

On topic is.....what will the defense do? Will they put Casey on the stand? that should prove quite interesting. Gee. I wonder how many will believe anything she has to say unless she just flat out confesses. And even that will be taken with a grain of salt.

I think they have to put her on.......Not sure that will go well for them, but not putting her on could spell a guilty verdict.

I think that they should put her on. If I ended up being convicted, I would not want to think "what if" the rest of my life. But yeah, It could get really ugly with her on the stand. I don't think that she is mentally strong enough to handle it. However, It takes someone strong to go through all of this. ~BH

I don't think she is. I still feel she'll crack prior to the end of this.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

I think they have to put her on.......Not sure that will go well for them, but not putting her on could spell a guilty verdict.

I think that they should put her on. If I ended up being convicted, I would not want to think "what if" the rest of my life. But yeah, It could get really ugly with her on the stand. I don't think that she is mentally strong enough to handle it. However, It takes someone strong to go through all of this. ~BH

I don't think she is. I still feel she'll crack prior to the end of this.

Glad to have a civil discussion now. No hard feelings. Yeah, I agree that she might crack if put on the stand. She's been through alot in regards to emotional stress (not that I care, but it's a fact). ~BH

 

[Yoda]

I think they have to put her on.......Not sure that will go well for them, but not putting her on could spell a guilty verdict.

I think that they should put her on. If I ended up being convicted, I would not want to think "what if" the rest of my life. But yeah, It could get really ugly with her on the stand. I don't think that she is mentally strong enough to handle it. However, It takes someone strong to go through all of this. ~BH

I don't think she is. I still feel she'll crack prior to the end of this.

That may be the truest statement said so far

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Then you would be a pathetic gambler as much as you are a patriot. I'm not defendin anyone, I'M DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION, which says she has a RIGHT to a fair trail. You are the one who's lying. You've already condemned this woman before hand. I asked you to direct me to a peice evidence from the case and all you can come up with is insults and opinion, which is fine, but but it's not fact is it?

I've already agreed with this point with you yet, you keep bring up insults and nothing more. You really need to go back and re-read the thread and the constitution. You sound dumber and dumber with each post.

Just because you're too ******* ignorant to follow a thread, that's not my fault. I guess I have to post it again for you?

Ok. All the websites that she visited (not naming them all) that were found on her hard drive. Not reporting the crime for over a month. Going out and partying like a slut during that month. The smell in her car. The tape placed on her daughters mouth. All the lies she has told, Including the nanny lie, which the change of her story into an accidental drowning clearly reveals. = LIAR. I am sure that I am missing some other things. Those are just the ones on top of my head.

Basically, Only a complete dumb shit doesn't see that she's guilty. ~BH

Let me help your weak mind out a little Yoda. Go back 3 or 4 pages and try real hard to figure it out. Here are the facts for your dumb ass.....

I answered your question to show what evidence I thought makes her look guilty. However, You're too ******* braindead to locate it because your too busy foaming out your mouth while looking for your Yoda figures lost light saber which is most likely behind your bed along with all your gay porn. You got one thing correct though. Yes, I attacked you after you drew first blood.

That's the way the world works Jr. You better learn to like it, or you will live a miserable life if and when you ever do move out of your parents house. No wonder your girl left you, you're an insecure little wormboy. You like? ~BH

Your first post since I came to this thread was insults and cursing. You wanted this and baited for it, so you got it. If you can't take it, then let's get back on topic and next time, show respect and either answer the ******* question or post a different without attacking one. Save the drama for your momma. If you can't do neither, than pick a different topic, website, or log off and shut the **** up. It really is simple.

Now, back on topic. Was any DNA found on the duct tape that belonged to anyone else but the girl?

We have already moved along without your dumb ass.

Get this straight ************. You don't give me orders. Whatever I said I never directed at you until you attacked me first. It's all there for anyone with a brain to go back and read. Just like my response to you answering your question of what evidence that I thought made her look guilty. Yet, you blow garbage about how I didn't respond. It's all there, just go back a few pages. Can you admit that you were wrong? Otherwise, Eat a dick bro.

Now you're running your mouth about my mother? Let me tell you something, I advise you to shut your ******* mouth or you're gonna get in over your head. Hey, I am all for meeting someone half way and calling a truce, but you need to learn the way the World works. ~BH

 

[oldsalt]

I think that they should put her on. If I ended up being convicted, I would not want to think "what if" the rest of my life. But yeah, It could get really ugly with her on the stand. I don't think that she is mentally strong enough to handle it. However, It takes someone strong to go through all of this. ~BH

I don't think she is. I still feel she'll crack prior to the end of this.

Glad to have a civil discussion now. No hard feelings. Yeah, I agree that she might crack if put on the stand. She's been through alot in regards to emotional stress (not that I care, but it's a fact). ~BH

None taken. The trio of GA, Cindy and CA all harbor more than they project. Someone is gonna let fly, my question is really this........ When the truth flows, will it be believed by the jury?

 

[BolshevikHunter]

I don't think she is. I still feel she'll crack prior to the end of this.

Glad to have a civil discussion now. No hard feelings. Yeah, I agree that she might crack if put on the stand. She's been through alot in regards to emotional stress (not that I care, but it's a fact). ~BH

None taken. The trio of GA, Cindy and CA all harbor more than they project. Someone is gonna let fly, my question is really this........ When the truth flows, will it be believed by the jury?

Good to hear that my friend. Most of my good freinds on the internet I went to battle against first. Left and right.

Anyway, I don't know. How does anyone really know what the truth is after all the lies? I mean, Do you believe 1# that her dad molested her? Or #2 that she accidently drowned? I personally don't believe either. I will say, and I have said this before earlier in this thread, that she most likely overdosed her with Ethanol so she could go out and didn't mean to kill her. Can anyone get Ethanol that easy? I dunno. The only thing that makes me think that she might have done it on purpose is the duct tape over the mouth. Why exactly would she do that? ~BH

 

[oldsalt]

Glad to have a civil discussion now. No hard feelings. Yeah, I agree that she might crack if put on the stand. She's been through alot in regards to emotional stress (not that I care, but it's a fact). ~BH

None taken. The trio of GA, Cindy and CA all harbor more than they project. Someone is gonna let fly, my question is really this........ When the truth flows, will it be believed by the jury?

Good to hear that my friend. Most of my good freinds on the internet I went to battle against first. Left and right.

Anyway, I don't know. How does anyone really know what the truth is after all the lies? I mean, Do you believe 1# that her dad molested her? Or #2 that she accidently drowned? I personally don't believe either. I will say, and I have said this before earlier in this thread, that she most likely overdosed her with Ethanol so she could go out and didn't mean to kill her. Can anyone get Ethanol that easy? I dunno. The only thing that makes me think that she might have done it on purpose is the duct tape over the mouth. Why exactly would she do that? ~BH

I believe neither. I think the DT was left w/o a defense, and they convinced ICA that this was her best bet. Let's face it folks, ICA doesn't have much solid ground from which to launch a legit defense. That doesn't make her guilty, but it does show intent to deceive.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

None taken. The trio of GA, Cindy and CA all harbor more than they project. Someone is gonna let fly, my question is really this........ When the truth flows, will it be believed by the jury?

Good to hear that my friend. Most of my good freinds on the internet I went to battle against first. Left and right.

Anyway, I don't know. How does anyone really know what the truth is after all the lies? I mean, Do you believe 1# that her dad molested her? Or #2 that she accidently drowned? I personally don't believe either. I will say, and I have said this before earlier in this thread, that she most likely overdosed her with Ethanol so she could go out and didn't mean to kill her. Can anyone get Ethanol that easy? I dunno. The only thing that makes me think that she might have done it on purpose is the duct tape over the mouth. Why exactly would she do that? ~BH

I believe neither. I think the DT was left w/o a defense, and they convinced ICA that this was her best bet. Let's face it folks, ICA doesn't have much solid ground from which to launch a legit defense. That doesn't make her guilty, but it does show intent to deceive.

oldsalt, I 100% agree bro. What other option did they really have? If I take a step outside of my own feelings, if I were a Defense attorney, I think the accidental drowning was the only logical direction to go in. Now that I know that they had a pool, I am suprised they waited until the beggining of the trial to use this tactic. However, I think the false accusations (in my opinion) against her father was a very big mistake in regards to Males on the Jury. It sounds like a desperate attempt for sympathy. ~BH

 

[oldsalt]

Good to hear that my friend. Most of my good freinds on the internet I went to battle against first. Left and right.

Anyway, I don't know. How does anyone really know what the truth is after all the lies? I mean, Do you believe 1# that her dad molested her? Or #2 that she accidently drowned? I personally don't believe either. I will say, and I have said this before earlier in this thread, that she most likely overdosed her with Ethanol so she could go out and didn't mean to kill her. Can anyone get Ethanol that easy? I dunno. The only thing that makes me think that she might have done it on purpose is the duct tape over the mouth. Why exactly would she do that? ~BH

I believe neither. I think the DT was left w/o a defense, and they convinced ICA that this was her best bet. Let's face it folks, ICA doesn't have much solid ground from which to launch a legit defense. That doesn't make her guilty, but it does show intent to deceive.

oldsalt, I 100% agree bro. What other option did they really have? If I take a step outside of my own feelings, if I were a Defense attorney, I think the accidental drowning was the only logical direction to go in. Now that I know that they had a pool, I am suprised they waited until the beggining of the trial to use this tactic. However, I think the false accusations (in my opinion) against her father was a very big mistake in regards to Males on the Jury. It sounds like a desperate attempt for sympathy. ~BH

I didn't like GA or Cindy prior to the start of the trial, don't like them any more now. GA thrown under the bus gained ICA nothing. IMHO, she is the only one that can keep her neck out of the noose, and even that is questionable at this point, due to her lying.