"Career public servants": THE PARTY IS OVER

I am a USMB legend with followers around the world
1740354431203.webp
 
I understand that the whole "bullet point" thing is standard SOP in the private sector.

Anyone care to comment on if that is true?
I’m in the private sector. Yes once a week I owe my boss a status on my 5 most important tasks. It takes at most 5 minutes. This is just not a big deal.
 
I’m in the private sector. Yes once a week I owe my boss a status on my 5 most important tasks. It takes at most 5 minutes. This is just not a big deal.
I did the same thing as a Federal Employee

Acting President Musk thinks he is a tough guy by demanding something that is already done
 
Its a waste of time, what would you actually do with all these bullet lists? Any business process that generates information should also consume that information somewhere.

Why ask for "approx five"? If I did ten important things why can't I list all of them?

What if I did only one thing? Will I get penalized for listing only one thing?

If I did one thing but that itself was comprised of five other small interrelated things, how do I list that?

  • Resolved the functional overlap with finance and accounting history calculation.
or
  • Reviewed the spec with the accounts team
  • Reviewed the spec with the finance team
  • Simplified the QA testing scope to remove the old issues
  • Identified which of the two overlapped code bases was in the best shape
  • Generalized the interfaces so that external sources can be easily added

These are examples of how utterly stupid it is to pretend that this is managing people. Also a good manager knows what his team are doing if he gave them the work. Usually teams meet weekly and this stuff gets thrashed out and decisions made, no need for stupid little emails back and forth and all the confusion and so on.

If you think is good management then now wonder the Chinese are beating us at industry. I know some truly excellent managers, people who get big bonuses for managing their staff and resources well and I know that if they hired a manager that started acting like Musk, telling people to write silly little emails, they'd be out the door.
Many companies that are very successful require this it’s not a big deal, but you are right if nobody’s reading it at the government then it’s useless. Every company I was at we gave our employees advice based on these in our weekly or biweekly one on ones.
 
They just declare any program that doesn’t match the MAGA agenda is FRAUD
No they declare programs that don't match the reason they were created FRAUD. Some programs were created fraudulent as well.
 
No Government agency is unconstitutional
>>>>>>A L L <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Government AGencies are UNconstitutional - they were the creation of scumbag Woodrow Wilson


Woodrow Wilson. . . argued that universal suffrage would make the three branches of government ignorant, indolent, and incapable of regulating modern affairs. Wilson’s solution? He wanted administrative agencies to operate in a separate, anti-constitutional, and antidemocratic space — free from pesky things like law and an increasingly diverse electorate. One of Wilson’s acolytes, James Landis, was the SEC’s founding father. . . . Landis hoped that the SEC could set upon Americans without interference from courts—unless and until the SEC gave courts permission to review its work. That is obviously not how our government is supposed to work. And in the Landisonian view, that’s precisely the point.

 
Government AGencies are UNconstitutional - they were the creation of scumbag Woodrow Wilson


Woodrow Wilson. . . argued that universal suffrage would make the three branches of government ignorant, indolent, and incapable of regulating modern affairs. Wilson’s solution? He wanted administrative agencies to operate in a separate, anti-constitutional, and antidemocratic space — free from pesky things like law and an increasingly diverse electorate. One of Wilson’s acolytes, James Landis, was the SEC’s founding father. . . . Landis hoped that the SEC could set upon Americans without interference from courts—unless and until the SEC gave courts permission to review its work. That is obviously not how our government is supposed to work. And in the Landisonian view, that’s precisely the point.

You have had over 100 years to prove them unconstitutional

You are not doing a very good job
 
Back
Top Bottom