Not even close, I'm all for private business to handle the majority of commerce, but I'm also for the government keeping them in check.
So, you're all for life, you just think death should be an immediate part of it... Got it.
So you want government to dictate what medicines people can get, and at what price. As I already pointed out, the immediate effect will be the end of advances in medicine. Your greed makes this appealing to you, regardless of consequence - I understand.
You say the state MUST seize drugs to make it more "fair" and ensure that "the poor" get their "fair share," right? I mean the greedy running dog capitalist pigs will sell at the highest price people are willing to pay. I mean, they want a return on the capital they invest. So you will have the state take from those who produce and give to those who do not. Kewl. No doubt people will flock to invest more capital, knowing that the return will be confiscated by the state, right It's human nature to not seek to gain from transactions - only evil capitalists want that.
But say Comrade, if medicine is vital for life, isn't food all that much MORE vital? None of us can live without food. Shouldn't the state "regulate" food and have state food stores to ensure that all people get "their fair share?"
It worked really well in Venezuela, driven by people just like you...