martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,310
- 43,569
- 2,300
- Thread starter
- #21
So, you do think since he is rich he should be above the laws of the land
Do you think it's OK for governments to censor social media platforms?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, you do think since he is rich he should be above the laws of the land
Yep, like a dealer giving out free drugs to get people hooked knowing they will recoup it all and more later on
Do you think it's OK for governments to censor social media platforms?
Glad we agreeIndeed he should.
That’s your biasBut I am betting that he cares more about money than censorship.
Is America a geopolitical enemy of Brazil now?Is a country trying to censor X any different than what our lawmakers want to do to TikTok?
So do we name what you have EDS or MDS?
I think he is an American and not beholden to foreign dictators.So, you do think since he is rich he should be above the laws of the land
You mean like the US banning TikTok?
You can call it whatever your little heart desires.
Unlike you I do not worship humans based upon their bank accounts.
So he will allow free access to Starlink while this plays out because he cares more about Money?
That’s your bias
Is America a geopolitical enemy of Brazil now?
Why does Musk go along with the required censoring in India instead of pulling the platform from that country?
I think he is an American and not beholden to foreign dictators.
You’d have to ask him…Is it? Why does Musk go along with the required censoring in India instead of pulling the platform from that country?
Wait, what? No…instead of building strawmen, why don’t you stick to topic?So, you are cool with censorship as long as the country names the source an "enemy"
He is not in a foreign land. He is right here, in America.It is easy to tell who has never left the country.
When one is in a foreign land, one must follow their laws.
The same goes for doing business in a foreign country.
He is not in a foreign land. He is right here, in America.
X is a corporation. It seems that simple concepts elude the left.
Mush has no risk to himself or his wealth and therefore, won't be worried about what little tin gods in other marxist countries have to say.
Its pretty simple. Every person who values speech and freedom should be against those nations that would take it way.
You’d have to ask him…
Wait, what? No…instead of building strawmen, why don’t you stick to topic?
Agree with all but the last bit. I’m not so sure that many will make “the right choice” as we see in here…He is not in a foreign land. He is right here, in America.
X is a corporation. It seems that simple concepts elude the left.
Mush has no risk to himself or his wealth and therefore, won't be worried about what little tin gods in other marxist countries have to say.
Its pretty simple. Every person who values speech and freedom should be against those nations that would take it way.
No need to go to wor. Just keep putting the information in front of the people of the world and they'll eventually make the right choice.
Free billionaires become the authoritarians.....and others must bend the knee to them and their billions.He can be a hero to the citizens of Brazil by providing a signal for them to use. After all, satellite signals are pretty broad-beamed -- yes, they can be narrowed, but why would anyone do so? - and travel everywhere. He cannot be responsible for the people in every country.
Of course, he could just stop all internet communications that use his Starlink network, but again, why should he?
Free people never bend the knee to dictatorial authoritarians.
Free billionaires become the authoritarians.....and others must bend the knee to them and their billions.
Nope, now you’re building more strawmen…The answer seems rather obvious
You are the one trying to justify one type of censorship while whining about another.