Canadian doctors push for babies to be euthanized under MAID program

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2012
Messages
43,702
Reaction score
42,742
Points
3,605
Now imagine what they do to kids? What they tell U.S agencies they do, when it is entirely inaccurate and dishonest.

Wake up America. Some of us are being persecuted here. The more vulnerable one is, the more excited they are to destroy you.


Canada’s medical assistance in dying program, already among the most expansive in the world, is facing scrutiny after physicians in Quebec suggested it could be extended to newborns.

The Quebec College of Physicians said, ā€œMedical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme painā€ and that ā€œparents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant,ā€ according to reporting by Anna Farrow in the Western Standard. The comments have revived a debate many believed had ended years ago.

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016. Since then, the range of the law has widened steadily, first covering terminal illness, then expanding to include non-terminal conditions. Federal data shows the pace has accelerated. In 2024, there were 16,499 reported MAID deaths, bringing the total since legalization to 76,475 by the end of that year.

By early 2026, at least 94,000 deaths had occurred under the program, according to Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.


Discussion of extending MAID to infants is not new. In 2022, Louis Roy of the Quebec College of Physicians appeared before Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. During that testimony, Roy suggested the program could apply to ā€œbabies from birth to one year of ageā€ who are born with severe deformities or disabilities, Farrow reported.

Reaction at the time was immediate. Speaking on CBC Radio, then-Liberal Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough rejected the idea outright, saying, ā€œThere is no world where I would accept that.ā€ Following the backlash, many observers believed the proposal had been dropped.
 
Now imagine what they do to kids? What they tell U.S agencies they do, when it is entirely inaccurate and dishonest.

Wake up America. Some of us are being persecuted here. The more vulnerable one is, the more excited they are to destroy you.


Canada’s medical assistance in dying program, already among the most expansive in the world, is facing scrutiny after physicians in Quebec suggested it could be extended to newborns.

The Quebec College of Physicians said, ā€œMedical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme painā€ and that ā€œparents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant,ā€ according to reporting by Anna Farrow in the Western Standard. The comments have revived a debate many believed had ended years ago.

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016. Since then, the range of the law has widened steadily, first covering terminal illness, then expanding to include non-terminal conditions. Federal data shows the pace has accelerated. In 2024, there were 16,499 reported MAID deaths, bringing the total since legalization to 76,475 by the end of that year.

By early 2026, at least 94,000 deaths had occurred under the program, according to Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.


Discussion of extending MAID to infants is not new. In 2022, Louis Roy of the Quebec College of Physicians appeared before Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. During that testimony, Roy suggested the program could apply to ā€œbabies from birth to one year of ageā€ who are born with severe deformities or disabilities, Farrow reported.

Reaction at the time was immediate. Speaking on CBC Radio, then-Liberal Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough rejected the idea outright, saying, ā€œThere is no world where I would accept that.ā€ Following the backlash, many observers believed the proposal had been dropped.

They don’t care what happens to ā€œotherā€ Americans, why would they care what happens to Canadians. We’re all better off here than they are in any case.

These are people who can’t get timely medical care because a trip to emergency costs them $1000 out of pocket.

As for your bullshit post: The PostMillenial is not a credible source. Extreme right bias and multiple failed fact checks.



 
Now imagine what they do to kids? What they tell U.S agencies they do, when it is entirely inaccurate and dishonest.

Wake up America. Some of us are being persecuted here. The more vulnerable one is, the more excited they are to destroy you.


Canada’s medical assistance in dying program, already among the most expansive in the world, is facing scrutiny after physicians in Quebec suggested it could be extended to newborns.

The Quebec College of Physicians said, ā€œMedical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme painā€ and that ā€œparents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant,ā€ according to reporting by Anna Farrow in the Western Standard. The comments have revived a debate many believed had ended years ago.

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016. Since then, the range of the law has widened steadily, first covering terminal illness, then expanding to include non-terminal conditions. Federal data shows the pace has accelerated. In 2024, there were 16,499 reported MAID deaths, bringing the total since legalization to 76,475 by the end of that year.

By early 2026, at least 94,000 deaths had occurred under the program, according to Alex Schadenberg of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition.

Discussion of extending MAID to infants is not new. In 2022, Louis Roy of the Quebec College of Physicians appeared before Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying. During that testimony, Roy suggested the program could apply to ā€œbabies from birth to one year of ageā€ who are born with severe deformities or disabilities, Farrow reported.

Reaction at the time was immediate. Speaking on CBC Radio, then-Liberal Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough rejected the idea outright, saying, ā€œThere is no world where I would accept that.ā€ Following the backlash, many observers believed the proposal had been dropped.
Naturally the libs obtain a signed consent form from the infant before killing it

Right?
 
Naturally the libs obtain a signed consent form from the infant before killing it

Right?

No one can authorize MAID on behalf of someone else. The applicant has to be an adult, of sound mind, or one who had clearly expressed (as in written) instructions prior to losing capacity, to get MAID.

Even then, barring a terminal diagnosis, there is a 90 day waiting period. My friend’s sister applied after a long period of illness but she recovered during the waiting period and changed her mind. Nobody tried to push her into it and she’s still going out with friends and enjoying life.

I had a friend who recently died from ALS. Her doctors and social workers handled all of her paperwork the moment she was diagnosed, and could legally make decisions. She chose her time and it was blessing to everyone, especially my friend. We’re all still missing her but she warned us a few weeks ahead of time that it was getting to be too hard.
 
They don’t care what happens to ā€œotherā€ Americans, why would they care what happens to Canadians. We’re all better off here than they are in any case.

These are people who can’t get timely medical care because a trip to emergency costs them $1000 out of pocket.

As for your bullshit post: The PostMillenial is not a credible source. Extreme right bias and multiple failed fact checks.



If Canadiens are so much better off than Americans, it then begs the question why there is no massive wave of illegal immigrants desperately seeking a better life for themselves and their families. You know, like America is dealing with.

BTW, in America you can get emergency health care no matter if you can pay for it or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom