Can you Name Three Actual Facts about Darwinism

[Hollie]

View attachment 623924

I can if that's what it takes to make some screws come loose in progressive atheist heads.

Have you figured out that nanosecond thingee yet?

After all it would take faith to allow for the time you desire for those there fossils to happen.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Your compulsive behavior toward atheists suggests converting to a religion that promotes Jihad.

****CHUCKLE****

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Oops, dodged the question again.

Should I assume that your answer is that there can never possibly be evidence of such a thing?

Which question would that be that you didn't answer?

How's that faith coming?

Steal any good creation theories to explain your religious faith in time while not claiming to be religious?

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can prove definitively that the universe existed more than a nanosecond ago?

If you do then you must have faith in your belief that the world existed millions of years ago, which sounds sort of like a religious belief to me.

Which is idiotic. We make safe bets based on evidence. That is not faith. You want to call it faith, because you want to put your primitive, faith based biefs on the same shelf with evidenced based determinations.

Given that you have no good argument to elevate your own faith based nonsense above the level of fairy tales and "because I say so", you have to try to drag evidenced based determinations down into the muck where your faith nonsense resides.

You have no choice. This is basically compulsive behavior on your part, because the alternative-- admitting your faith based magical beliefs belong on the shelf with the spoon benders and alien abduction tales -- is something you can't accept.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 623928

Which question would that be that you didn't answer?

How's that faith coming?

Steal any good creation theories to explain your religious faith in time while not claiming to be religious?

*****CHUCKLE*****

Oops, you dodged the question again.

I knew you would. That's the design of the question. It quickly separates the intellectual frauds from the rest.

And it works every time.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Your compulsive behavior toward atheists suggests converting to a religion that promotes Jihad.

****CHUCKLE****

Where have I ever suggested that darlin'?

Are you seeing things with that psycobabble religion of yours?

Do you need a prop like a crystal ball to divine those things?

Have faith! Time will allow you to see many things, even in the stones of the earth.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Which is idiotic. We make safe bets based on evidence. That is not faith. You want to call it faith, because you want to put your primitive, faith based biefs on the same shelf with evidenced based determinations.

Given that you have no good argument to elevate your own faith based nonsense above the level of fairy tales and "because I say so", you have to try to drag evidenced based determinations down into the muck where your faith nonsense resides.

You have no choice. This is basically compulsive behavior on your part, because the alternative-- admitting your faith based magical beliefs belong on the shelf with the spoon benders and alien abduction tales -- is something you can't accept.

I'm not the one seeing monsters in the rocks that you can't prove existed except in your acid trip dreams.

Show me a real living breathing T-Rex since you have so much faith in this thing called time.

You ask for people to believe you yet all you can produce is some pretty etched rocks that allowed you to imagine all sorts of horrendous monsters from your bad trip.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Oops, you dodged the question again.

I knew you would. That's the design of the question. It quickly separates the intellectual frauds from the rest.

And it works every time.

Restate your question because obviously you're the one who's an intellectual fraud since you can't keep up with all you side trips from reality.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The only real fact people need to consider is that the notion of evolution does not really contradict their religion unless they want it to.

All a religious person needs to do is imagine a complex rather than simplistic God and view evolution as an illustration of one of the many miracles of God handiwork.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

The only real fact people need to consider is that the notion of evolution does not really contradict their religion unless they want it to.

All a religious person needs to do is imagine a complex rather than simplistic God and view evolution as an illustration of one of the many miracles of God handiwork.

There's no complexity about it.

God exists.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 623932

I'm not the one seeing monsters in the rocks that you can't prove existed except in your acid trip dreams.

Show me a real living breathing T-Rex since you have so much faith in this thing called time.

You ask for people to believe you yet all you can produce is some pretty etched rocks that allowed you to imagine all sorts of horrendous monsters from your bad trip.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Oh look, dodged the question again.

 

[Cougarbear]

Such street corner proselytizing doesn't address the fact of an ancient planet, biological evolution or speciation. Such things as ''spirit bodies'', ''spirit realms'' and various gods are claims typical of most religions and like other religions, your claims remain completely unsupported.

You cannot possibly compare our doctrine to other religions, especially mainstream Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism... As I mentioned, our intelligence is pure energy which goes right along with energy (mass) cannot be made nor destroyed. Therefore, this is all supported from the very foundation of life.

 

[Cougarbear]

Oops, you dodged the question again.

Let's try this again:

What would the evidence look like?

Be specific.

Oops, you dodged the question again. Try again. What is your evidence we ascended from a microbe in the sea? Be specific...

 

[Concerned American]

Name three specific things about Darwinism that are true?

Not "it's all real!" or "only stupid people ask that question!" or some other nonsense.

Can you give me some true facts that we know about Darwinian evolution and how we know them?

Since it is the THEORY of Evolution, there are no FACTS.

 

[Concerned American]

One species changing into another is called speciation and there are many examples. So, you are incorrect.

Biological evolution being the process that accounts for the diversity of life on the planet is the best explanation for that result.

That is one "theory" There are no evolutionary FACTS.

 

[Concerned American]

Except for the proof that it happens and over long periods of time.

There is no PROOF, that is why it is considered Darwin's THEORY of Evolution.

 

[Cougarbear]

Evolution is not directional. It does not advance linearly or directionally from dumb to smart or from simple to complex. The impression you have that it does so literally reeks of something you were taught at your fundamentalist madrassah. If that is the case, you are promoting falsehoods on their behalf. Lay off the fundie creation ministries.

How do you account for fossil remains that show clear transitions from one species to another over millions of years? How do the religious extremists account for geologic time frames of millions of years vs. Just a few thousand?

Ark'ists insist that the planet is a mere few thousand years old so explain the fossil evidence dating back hundreds of millions of years ago.

So, a microbe can evolve into a chicken. But, then the chicken can evolve into a fish. Then, the fish can evolve into venus flytraps. Then venus flytraps can evolve into birds. Then birds can evolve into snakes. Then snakes can evolve into apes. Then apes can evolve into dinosaurs. Then dinosaurs can evolve into chimps and then into humans. There, that's not directional.

There are no fossils that show a transition from one species to another over millions of years. There is no missing link from apes to humans. Just the made up idea that there is one yet found.

There's plenty of evidence of the errors in methods of dating including geological.

Original Biochemistry Shows That Fossils Are Recent | The Institute for Creation Research

www.icr.org

There's a lot more there to look at...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oops, you dodged the question again. Try again. What is your evidence we ascended from a microbe in the sea? Be specific...

No , sorry, you must first tell me what some of that evidence might look like. Then I will try to meet your standard.

Intelligent people have no problem answering such a question.

And, go.


You won't. Not ever. And we both know why.

 

[Cougarbear]

No , sorry, you must first tell me what some of that evidence might look like. Then I will try to meet your standard.

Intelligent people have no problem answering such a question.

And, go.


You won't. Not ever. And we both know why.

So, you should have no problem answering my question, which actually was before yours.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So, you should have no problem answering my question, which actually was before yours.

I don't. The problem I have is meeting your apparently very secret and exacting standards for this evidence. Obviously, I could produce some of the evidence that has convinced the global scientific community and nearly every educated adult on the planet. Any child wth Google could do that.

There is a thread right now on this very topic that has plenty of evidence posted in it. But it has not convinced you.

And any intelligent adult who is not a fraud could and would answer my question.

So, let's try this again:

What are some examples of what this evidence would look like?

Be as specific as you can.

 

[BackAgain]

Can you Name Three Actual Facts about Darwinism​

I think so.
1. It is a theory named after Darwin.
2. It posits that when creatures die because if things in their natural environment, the ones that survive are the ones who had some genetic trait that made their survival more likely and that this genetic trait itself then gets passed along to future generations because the survivors are the breeders.
3. Darwin was on a ship called the Beagle. Ok ok. Maybe that’s just an actual fact about Darwin, not Darwinism. Give me a moment.
3. The genetic traits that give the individual survivors can include speed, camouflage, intelligence etc., and since the breeders have these traits, there is an enhanced prospect that their offspring and lines of defendants will too thereby improving the prospects for the survival of that species.