☭proletarian☭;2195609 said:
Those who opposed such changes were conservative by definition.
Are you simple?
All those things basically amounted to what? Getting paid for not being at work. Being guaranteed the right not to "Work too hard" or work more than 40 hours a week in an attempt to out-work the opposition. See how the most competitive fields don't abide by 40 hours work weeks? Because they try to outwork each other, and as a result, all parties end up with a better product.
All those things go along with an overwhelming liberal philosophy: Get paid for work you aren't doing, being entitled to something unearned, not being subject to orders that you need to work harder, and of course, the union makes it nearly impossible to fire someone who sits around and does mediocre work during those 40 hours.
The result? Mediocrity, no worker motivation, aka, THE ENTIRE INEFFICIENT AND LAZY GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE WE SEE NOW.