Life is life but that doesn't imply that life is a person or human being. If I extract a living, human cell from my finger, that living cell is human but that in and of itself doesn't make it a human person or being. In order for that cell to survive and become a human being, it would have to be attached to technology and eventually a womb. It has potential to become a human person, but that potential depends upon actual human beings providing it with the means to actualize itself into a human being. A woman, who is an actual human being with her own set of interests, needs, and circumstances is not morally obligated to provide herself to a zygote or embryo, attached to her uterus, allowing it to become a human being. She's the one that should decide for herself if she's going to remain pregnant, bearing the cost of that condition, not someone else.
In a perfect world, women would only get pregnant when they're ready to be mothers, but unfortunately, we don't live in that perfect, ideal world. More, many of the so-called "pro-life" people, elect Republican, conservative politicians that defund social programs that help single mothers raise their children. So it's ironic to see people who have such disregard for single mothers and their children, promoting legislation that forces women to remain pregnant when they don't want to be (all of their compassion is directed at fetuses). They're so concerned about the fetuses in other people's wombs, then refuse to provide needed assistance to those same "fetuses" when they become children, living in a single-parent home. These "Pro-Life" Republicans are hypocrites, especially if they claim to be disciples of Jesus Christ. Because the true disciples of Jesus would prioritize the survival and wellbeing of life outside of the womb, not life inside of it. At the very least, they would continue caring for people outside of the womb, after they're born, not just while they're in the womb.