Can Gun Nuts Please Stop Saying You Need Guns to Protect Yourself From A Potential Tyrannical Government!!!

[Missourian]

These people are terrified.

If we're the ones who are terrified... why are you the ones trying to get rid of the guns?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It makes you sound mentally challenged.

Having guns is not going to protect you from the police or military. With normal police equipment, SWAT teams, police tactics and fire power etc, they can easily neutralize any armed threat or movement. They wouldn't even break a sweat. Not to mention, police surveillance tactics will make it impossible for an anti-government group to organize a big enough threat to the regime. You don't have a chance. And that is only the police. Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces). There is a reason you have not seen a people's uprising to over-throw a government even in Africa in decade. And really only Sudan has been overthrown by a military coup.

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

It is true the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and good people, including AR-15 owners. But that 1% or 0.05% that are not responsible can cause havoc, as we just saw in Highland park (an event I was on my way to attend and an event to which I know many people that were directly effected).

If you want to hunt, then a single shot hunting rifle will suffice. If it is about home defense, then handguns and shotguns (which as both short-range) would be sufficient.

There are many things that can be done, such as arm teachers, have cops in schools, secure soft targets, better mental health facilities, red flag rules and immunity for snitching, involuntary institutionalization, high standards for gun ownership, higher and minimum sentences for illegal gun possession, Federal no buy lists, vicarious liability for guns for the gun owner etc., but stop with the argument that you need guns for tyrannical governments! Because it is foolish.

There should be a ban on all guns other then single shot hunting rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Now I know handguns are by far the weapon of choice in the vast number of homicides, but so called "assault rifles" (yes I know that is a term the liberals made up) it by far a more sufficient weapon to commit mass murder then a handgun, even if they are semi-automatic (vs full).

Keep sticking to these stances that turn off the moderates (e.g. ban on abortion and do nothing on guns) and then cry about how Demorats can win with gas over $5-6, out of control inflation, major blunders in foreign policy and everyone hating woke politics. If the Demorats keep the House and pick up senate seats you are going to see the most radical changes to this country that we haver ever seen.

You can go fuck yourself

 

[Red Front]

You do know that most workers work for small businesses like mom and pop stores. These are the true capitalists. I feel you don't know what capitalism is by your words. Everything else is good thought and why we have problems with our young people. But, it's not because of capitalists for it's the socialist Democrats who are pushing the woke indoctrination of our country. It's the Republican capitalists who are fighting against this wokeism that is destroying the fabric of this nation that you are attacking. Take an economics course from a capitalist and you will understand the difference between capitalism and socialism.

When I use the term "capitalist" I'm not referring to mom-and-pop stores, although yes they are technically also capitalists, if they own a private business enterprise and have employees. The dictatorial employer-employee relationship is also found in those small businesses but the real problem is the large corporations, the billionaires, and bankers, those are who we criticize and work to overthrow. It's not genuine Marxism or communism that is responsible for the decadence you now see in American culture, that's the result of capitalist exploitation. For example, much of the current gender confusion and transsexualism is being fueled by the medical industry and big pharma. Goerge Soros a billionaire and others like him, fund the protests and the "pride parades", the legislation..etc. All of this decadence is very profitable for some capitalists, especially the emasculation of men.

Karl Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, and all of the rest of them, weren't friendly to what the so-called "woke" liberals are promoting. They would've been labeled "fascists" "homophobic", and "transphobic" by modern American liberals. Democrats aren't socialists, although some of them claim to be. Socialism or Communism, is far from what Democrats are espousing.

More, with respect to the Republicans, they hurt the working class by creating laws that allow the rich to legally pay very little taxes while the working-class are forced to pay more. They also neglect the development and maintenance of vital infrastructure, they privatize all major centers of economic power, they defund needed social programs and entitlements, like Medicare, Medicaid, social security..etc. They undermine worker rights and the ability of labor to unionize. They support unnecessary wars..etc. They deregulate the banks and other corporations to the point of creating devastating financial crises, that then require government bailouts. They allowed corporations to gut America of its manufacturing base.

Republicans create very authoritarian work environments where workers are expected to work more for less pay and benefits. Our country has a sovereign currency, so as long as our GDP is high, our federal government can very easily fund social programs and the development of our infrastructure without any issues. It's within our budget, but Republicans insist that our government doesn't have enough money, and that's simply not true.

The government is a social aparatus organized by the people to manage their large-scale socioeconomic, civil affairs and projects. Government isn't inherently good or evil, it's whatever we the people want it to be.

 

[Mac1958]

Your mockery and stupidity is noted.

We are a country because someone alerted us the Redcoats were coming.

Maybe crack a book sometime?

Oh, I could never be as smart and accurately-informed as you.

 

[Mac1958]

If we're the ones who are terrified... why are you the ones trying to get rid of the guns?

I guess you'd have to ask someone who is "trying to get rid of guns".

I'm very happy to say that I'm not like either one of you.

 

[gipper]

It makes you sound mentally challenged.

Having guns is not going to protect you from the police or military. With normal police equipment, SWAT teams, police tactics and fire power etc, they can easily neutralize any armed threat or movement. They wouldn't even break a sweat. Not to mention, police surveillance tactics will make it impossible for an anti-government group to organize a big enough threat to the regime. You don't have a chance. And that is only the police. Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces). There is a reason you have not seen a people's uprising to over-throw a government even in Africa in decade. And really only Sudan has been overthrown by a military coup.

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

It is true the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and good people, including AR-15 owners. But that 1% or 0.05% that are not responsible can cause havoc, as we just saw in Highland park (an event I was on my way to attend and an event to which I know many people that were directly effected).

If you want to hunt, then a single shot hunting rifle will suffice. If it is about home defense, then handguns and shotguns (which as both short-range) would be sufficient.

There are many things that can be done, such as arm teachers, have cops in schools, secure soft targets, better mental health facilities, red flag rules and immunity for snitching, involuntary institutionalization, high standards for gun ownership, higher and minimum sentences for illegal gun possession, Federal no buy lists, vicarious liability for guns for the gun owner etc., but stop with the argument that you need guns for tyrannical governments! Because it is foolish.

There should be a ban on all guns other then single shot hunting rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Now I know handguns are by far the weapon of choice in the vast number of homicides, but so called "assault rifles" (yes I know that is a term the liberals made up) it by far a more sufficient weapon to commit mass murder then a handgun, even if they are semi-automatic (vs full).

Keep sticking to these stances that turn off the moderates (e.g. ban on abortion and do nothing on guns) and then cry about how Demorats can win with gas over $5-6, out of control inflation, major blunders in foreign policy and everyone hating woke politics. If the Demorats keep the House and pick up senate seats you are going to see the most radical changes to this country that we haver ever seen.

Apparently you aren’t schooled in military history. If you were, you‘d know that throughout history powerful nations have been defeated by weaker nations. If you’re an American you’ve witnessed this first hand in Vietnam and elsewhere. How about the American Revolution? Ever heard of it?

 

[Devils_Advocate]

No.

Can you stop using more than one repeated punctuation mark at the end of a sentence?

It makes you look illiterate.

!!! I have been doing it for years and these fools copy me !!!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It makes you sound mentally challenged.

Having guns is not going to protect you from the police or military. With normal police equipment, SWAT teams, police tactics and fire power etc, they can easily neutralize any armed threat or movement. They wouldn't even break a sweat. Not to mention, police surveillance tactics will make it impossible for an anti-government group to organize a big enough threat to the regime. You don't have a chance. And that is only the police. Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces). There is a reason you have not seen a people's uprising to over-throw a government even in Africa in decade. And really only Sudan has been overthrown by a military coup.

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

It is true the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and good people, including AR-15 owners. But that 1% or 0.05% that are not responsible can cause havoc, as we just saw in Highland park (an event I was on my way to attend and an event to which I know many people that were directly effected).

If you want to hunt, then a single shot hunting rifle will suffice. If it is about home defense, then handguns and shotguns (which as both short-range) would be sufficient.

There are many things that can be done, such as arm teachers, have cops in schools, secure soft targets, better mental health facilities, red flag rules and immunity for snitching, involuntary institutionalization, high standards for gun ownership, higher and minimum sentences for illegal gun possession, Federal no buy lists, vicarious liability for guns for the gun owner etc., but stop with the argument that you need guns for tyrannical governments! Because it is foolish.

There should be a ban on all guns other then single shot hunting rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Now I know handguns are by far the weapon of choice in the vast number of homicides, but so called "assault rifles" (yes I know that is a term the liberals made up) it by far a more sufficient weapon to commit mass murder then a handgun, even if they are semi-automatic (vs full).

Keep sticking to these stances that turn off the moderates (e.g. ban on abortion and do nothing on guns) and then cry about how Demorats can win with gas over $5-6, out of control inflation, major blunders in foreign policy and everyone hating woke politics. If the Demorats keep the House and pick up senate seats you are going to see the most radical changes to this country that we haver ever seen.

Isn’t all of that the government? Military, cops etc run by democrats is the reason to own guns. It really boils down to defense from democrats and the government agencies they control.

So thank you for listing the exact government we need to defend ourselves from.

 

[whitehall]

Why do free speech nuts seem to hang on to antiquated 1st Amendment policies? Do you people really need the 4th Amendment when warrants only get in the way of the government's agenda?

 

[Uncensored2008]

It makes you sound mentally challenged.

Having guns is not going to protect you from the police or military. With normal police equipment, SWAT teams, police tactics and fire power etc, they can easily neutralize any armed threat or movement. They wouldn't even break a sweat. Not to mention, police surveillance tactics will make it impossible for an anti-government group to organize a big enough threat to the regime. You don't have a chance. And that is only the police. Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces). There is a reason you have not seen a people's uprising to over-throw a government even in Africa in decade. And really only Sudan has been overthrown by a military coup.

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

It is true the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and good people, including AR-15 owners. But that 1% or 0.05% that are not responsible can cause havoc, as we just saw in Highland park (an event I was on my way to attend and an event to which I know many people that were directly effected).

If you want to hunt, then a single shot hunting rifle will suffice. If it is about home defense, then handguns and shotguns (which as both short-range) would be sufficient.

There are many things that can be done, such as arm teachers, have cops in schools, secure soft targets, better mental health facilities, red flag rules and immunity for snitching, involuntary institutionalization, high standards for gun ownership, higher and minimum sentences for illegal gun possession, Federal no buy lists, vicarious liability for guns for the gun owner etc., but stop with the argument that you need guns for tyrannical governments! Because it is foolish.

There should be a ban on all guns other then single shot hunting rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Now I know handguns are by far the weapon of choice in the vast number of homicides, but so called "assault rifles" (yes I know that is a term the liberals made up) it by far a more sufficient weapon to commit mass murder then a handgun, even if they are semi-automatic (vs full).

Keep sticking to these stances that turn off the moderates (e.g. ban on abortion and do nothing on guns) and then cry about how Demorats can win with gas over $5-6, out of control inflation, major blunders in foreign policy and everyone hating woke politics. If the Demorats keep the House and pick up senate seats you are going to see the most radical changes to this country that we haver ever seen.

Yep, that's what we learned for Iraq and Afghanistan.




You fucking retard...

 

[Uncensored2008]

The five previous responses pretty much say it all to discredit your thought process. The 2nd amendment has nothing to do with hunting. So, why even bring it up?
If our tyrannical leaders attempt to take away our guns, we will defend the Constitution with those guns. We may lose, but we will fight. Because, if we lose our guns, we lose our liberty, freedom and religion. And, we won't allow that to happen. As Patrick Henry said, "Give me liberty or give me death." We aren't afraid to die for our liberty and freedom. Some of you may want to give up and give into tyranny of the left. But, this won't continue very much longer. The Second Coming of Christ is around the corner. Whose on the Lord side who? Those who defend the Constitution is who is on the Lord side.

We won't lose.

No more than the Taliban or Bathists lost.

Insurgents with small arms have kicked the ass of our military for 25 years.

 

[scruffy]

Government isn't inherently good or evil, it's whatever we the people want it to be.

If it were that simple there would be no need for protests.

 

[Red Front]

If it were that simple there would be no need for protests.

We need to protest in order to make sure government reforms and begins to serve the people. If people were more proactive and involved in keeping the government accountable we wouldn't be in this situation.

 

[iceberg]

Oh, I could never be as smart and accurately-informed as you.

FINALLY

you stated a fact.

i lost a $10 bet to westwall but oh well.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces).

True.

The Red Dawn fantasy is just that – a fantasy.

Moreover, there’s nothing in the history, text, or case law of the Second Amendment that authorizes insurrectionist dogma.

And Ukrainian soldiers have complained that the last thing they need are small arms, which are useless fighting against the invading Russians; they need rockets, missiles, and heavy artillery.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

Also true.

Possessing an AR 15 is a want, not a need – and there’s nothing wrong with that.

Conservatives need to stop lying about how they ‘need’ an AR 15 for self-defense or to ‘oppose government tyranny’ – all of which is nonsense.

 

[Vastator]

It makes you sound mentally challenged.

Having guns is not going to protect you from the police or military. With normal police equipment, SWAT teams, police tactics and fire power etc, they can easily neutralize any armed threat or movement. They wouldn't even break a sweat. Not to mention, police surveillance tactics will make it impossible for an anti-government group to organize a big enough threat to the regime. You don't have a chance. And that is only the police. Your little AR-15 isn't going to do anything to a drone, tank, apache helicopter, fighter jet or combat unit (much less special forces). There is a reason you have not seen a people's uprising to over-throw a government even in Africa in decade. And really only Sudan has been overthrown by a military coup.

No, the only reason you want certain guns (such as a AR-15) is because you like to have them.

It is true the vast majority of gun owners are responsible and good people, including AR-15 owners. But that 1% or 0.05% that are not responsible can cause havoc, as we just saw in Highland park (an event I was on my way to attend and an event to which I know many people that were directly effected).

If you want to hunt, then a single shot hunting rifle will suffice. If it is about home defense, then handguns and shotguns (which as both short-range) would be sufficient.

There are many things that can be done, such as arm teachers, have cops in schools, secure soft targets, better mental health facilities, red flag rules and immunity for snitching, involuntary institutionalization, high standards for gun ownership, higher and minimum sentences for illegal gun possession, Federal no buy lists, vicarious liability for guns for the gun owner etc., but stop with the argument that you need guns for tyrannical governments! Because it is foolish.

There should be a ban on all guns other then single shot hunting rifles, handguns and shotguns.

Now I know handguns are by far the weapon of choice in the vast number of homicides, but so called "assault rifles" (yes I know that is a term the liberals made up) it by far a more sufficient weapon to commit mass murder then a handgun, even if they are semi-automatic (vs full).

Keep sticking to these stances that turn off the moderates (e.g. ban on abortion and do nothing on guns) and then cry about how Demorats can win with gas over $5-6, out of control inflation, major blunders in foreign policy and everyone hating woke politics. If the Demorats keep the House and pick up senate seats you are going to see the most radical changes to this country that we haver ever seen.

No.

 

[Circe]

No.

Can you stop using more than one repeated punctuation mark at the end of a sentence?

It makes you look illiterate.

Can Gun Nuts Please Stop Saying You Need Guns to Protect Yourself From A Potential Tyrannical Government!!!​

No.

But I'll defend to the death the privilege of using entirely too many exclamation points!!!

At least for women.

Well, at least for me.

 

[Vastator]

True.

The Red Dawn fantasy is just that – a fantasy.

Moreover, there’s nothing in the history, text, or case law of the Second Amendment that authorizes insurrectionist dogma.

And Ukrainian soldiers have complained that the last thing they need are small arms, which are useless fighting against the invading Russians; they need rockets, missiles, and heavy artillery.

They're pointing thier weapons in the wrong direction...

 

[Missouri_Mike]

We need to protest in order to make sure government reforms and begins to serve the people. If people were more proactive and involved in keeping the government accountable we wouldn't be in this situation.

In order for that to happen the government needs to be cut by 75%.