Zone1 Can free speech exist after the death of Kirk ?

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
57,956
Reaction score
26,697
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?

You're allowed to advocate for whatever you want, but don't go giving us a lecture about the freedom of speech when you don't know anything about it and that sometimes there are still consequences about it.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?

Gloating about the murder of an innocent man marks you as the piece of shit we all know you to be.

It also creates many, many, many more Charlie Kirks, all of whom are better humans than you.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk.

Trump himself spews hate speech most days.

That because in LIBs mind the truth has become hate speech.

For example...tranny's in the military...it is not a social experiment and it is not a right to serve.

Since you are ranting about it...it should be hard to fine a example.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?

Can free speech exist after the death of Kirk ?​

I guess that would depend on if the government was actually involved in the shooting or actually, intentionally covering up, those involved in the killing of Kirk, with a fake narrative.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?


Pick your best example, for discussion purposes.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?
99% of the hate speech comes from democrats and you schickelgruber
 
Gloating about the murder of an innocent man marks you as the piece of shit we all know you to be.

It also creates many, many, many more Charlie Kirks, all of whom are better humans than you.
Not a George F fan, but are you forgetting the things you said about him?
is ANY kind of Hate a good ting for our country?
 
15th post
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?
The conservative politicians aren't leading any jihad against those who vehemently criticized Charlie Kirk. They have expressed their hatred for his being murdered simply for politely speaking to opponents on various matters.
The leftists are the ones who have been conducting a sort-of jihad against the freedom of speech, lying by calling those that simply disagree with them, Nazis, Fascists and threats to Democracy, clearly demonstrating that they are the clear and present threat to actual Democracy.
People being fired from their jobs for vile comments regarding Charlie Kirks murder, has nothing to do with the conservative politicians, but a public that is very correct in its disgust with those that mocked hir murder and thus those upset called the peoples employers to complain, sending them the videos of those celebrating the murder and any company or agency, hospital or other business, doesn't want to be associated with individuals who would do such a thing, so they fired those employees, saying their behavior didn't align with their businesses, hospitals, or schools beliefs.
So, no "political" jihad on the conservative side, only on the left.
 
Free speech seems to be under threat since the death of Kirk. Trump himself, Bondi Hegseth and Vance have all weighed in on hate speech.
Trump himself spews hate speevh most days.
I understand that hate speech is protected under your constitution.

Im not sure that is healthy.
Having leading politicians ;ead a jihad against people who have said mean things about the late Charlie is just not on.
Didnt you have the right to express yourself and associate yourself with whoever you wanted to ?

But the current veersion seems to define hate speech as any speeh that is negative about trump and his policies.

So uf Kirk spread hate should he not expect some in returm ? Im not advocating killing him. But shouldnt people be allowed to respond ?
In the same way shouldnt people be allowed to advocate for Palestine ?Should students be allowed to protest without the fear that their college will have their funding cut ?
Many older posters protested against the war in Vietnam. History has proved them right. To trumps credit he wanted no part of it and sat that war out.
Should legal firms be allowed to represent clients opposed to the govt without fear ? Isnt the right to a lawyer actually a right ?
You don't have free speech in your country. Worry about your own house
 
Back
Top Bottom