Your Catholic religion indeed has had some very evil and corrupt popes in the past. This is not one of them.
Your entire post only re confirms for me just how rotten religious people are.
Your posts reveal a severely jaundiced eye toward all people of religious faith, as well as a total lack of scholarship in the very subject you so readily comment upon. As one who critiques religion without ever having studied it, seemingly, you're like a guy commenting on calculus who's never taken a math class. For such people, any concept of god cannot drill any deeper than a concept of the Tooth Fairy. That's why all internet discussions about religion are identical. They typically occur between a simplistic fundamentalist and a simplistic anti-religious illiterate on the subject.
I've seen nothing in your posts to belie a total fealty and synchronized lock step with the petty Hitchens-esque agenda-driven mimicry of talking points copied and pasted from the storehouse of atheistic antagonism. While we agree that Pope Francis is doing an admirable job, it seems the only reason he meets your approval is for the controversy he's stirred up, most of which is a result of his statements being exaggerated or taken out of context by headline writers who like to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Despite the fact that wars are fought over resources, strategic territory and political power, you're one of those atheist clones who blame all historical wars squarely on religion. The thousands of historical laws which could get people executed or enslaved for poaching a rabbit, stealing a loaf of bread, adultery, treason, failure to pay taxes, etc., were probably 99.5% issued by the temporal powers of kings, dukes and barons and the like (and not the Church). Yes, after the fall of the Roman Empire, the Church served as a sort of temporal power meting out laws of crime and punishment outside of the Vatican, but that period was far and away the exception of the rule. If a clergy member disagreed with Henry VIII, his head would be cut off. But, if you listen to the chirpings of unrefined atheistic historians, including those creative writers who rewrote for the script of Cosmos, it was invariably the Church which put people to the rack.
Despite the fact that the Church commissioned much of the work of early scientists, and that Classical knowledge was preserved in the abbey system, and that the Church invented the modern university, and that many of today's leading educational and medical research institutions are private institutions belonging to a church, and despite the fact that every branch of science has one or more religious freaks among its pioneers, within the camp of antagonistic atheists no such fact of history is allowed to enter.
Churches are made up of people. People are strange. Go down to the DMV and look around. Those are the people who are striving to exemplify the world's religions, or not. They are no more qualified to do so that the average person in qualified to understand quantum mechanics or to play in the NBA. Gore Vidal said that art is not a democracy. You're either born an artist or you are not. Similarly, you are either born with a capacity to grasp sacred esoteric knowledge, or you aren't and you can strive follow the example of a religious figure like Jesus, or you can be an atheist, or finally you can be a petty atheist on fire with an anti-religion agenda.
"In all history there is no war which was not hatched by the governments, the governments alone, independent of the interests of the people, to whom war is always pernicious even when successful."
-Leo Tolstoy