Can 500 law professors be wrong?

[edward37]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

Tough shit.


The lies against Kav have had no effect. The gentleman will be a Supreme Court justice by the end of the week, and even ultra moderate GOP senators like Corker agree.

But this was an interesting experience. The Kavanaugh confirmation is a church picnic compared to what we will see when Ginsberg croaks and the Trumpster fills that seat with a conservative firebrand.

Brett Kavanaugh's young daughters have had to go through the psychological TORMENT of sitting there and having their father accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile, the Unhinged Left are Demons in human form.

SO WHY TF did he drag them in ,,to see senators kiss his ass?

If you were accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile wouldn't you get ANGRY? If not then you are not normal, 99.9% of ANYONE who was accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile would ERUPT EXACTLY like Brett Kavanaugh did, he had a normal human reaction to the most heinous and vicious accusations that you can accuse anyone of.

He's unfit! One need not be a law professor to have seen his performance, it was unbecoming of a judge, and indecorous. Hid body language alone raised suspicion that he was not honest, his anger and the bias he expressed is sufficient to vote him down.

And the only reason Trump nominated him was to protect his sorry ass from the big bad dems

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Five hundred liberal law professor don't think BK should be on the SC??

I'm sure BK will give their opinions all the consideration that are due.

NONE

can't stop anyone for believing in and giving protection to scum like Kavanaugh It's in republican genes

Show how Brett Kavanaugh is scum, there is no evidence that this man has not conducted his adult life in a decent way. Scum is Dianne Feinstein, scum is Debra Katz, scum is Andrew Bromwich, scum is Christine Ford, scum is the MSM human filth.

if you added trumps name I'd give you thank you

This situation if not stopped is going to set a very dangerous precedent that destroys Centuries of established legality which has always been that ANYONE is INNOCENT until proven GUILTY, this now would put that down the toilet and turn it to ANYONE is GUILTY until they prove they are INNOCENT, that ANYONE can be accused of ANYTHING with no evidence but they are given Trial By Partisan Media and then IF they defend themselves they are considered some type of psychopath and then their life is DESTROYED.

 

[JWBooth]

The question is republican sheep ,,how many job interviews could you go on and act that way and still get the job???

How many job interviews are conducted where half the interviewers are openly and professed in their opposition to your very existence? How many job interviews are conducted where half the interviewers are openly hostile to the notion of your promotion? How many job interviews are conducted where half the interviewers have publicly smeared your reputation?

Shitty analogy promoted by a total dumbass.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If anger is a disqualifying characteristic for judges, I can name no less than 20 with whom I have personally interacted who should be disqualified.

Most of them are pretty good judges but fuck with them and it's your ass.

 

[BookShaka]

Just when I think you people couldn’t be any dumber...

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

Tough shit.


The lies against Kav have had no effect. The gentleman will be a Supreme Court justice by the end of the week, and even ultra moderate GOP senators like Corker agree.

But this was an interesting experience. The Kavanaugh confirmation is a church picnic compared to what we will see when Ginsberg croaks and the Trumpster fills that seat with a conservative firebrand.

Brett Kavanaugh's young daughters have had to go through the psychological TORMENT of sitting there and having their father accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile, the Unhinged Left are Demons in human form.

SO WHY TF did he drag them in ,,to see senators kiss his ass?

If you were accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile wouldn't you get ANGRY? If not then you are not normal, 99.9% of ANYONE who was accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile would ERUPT EXACTLY like Brett Kavanaugh did, he had a normal human reaction to the most heinous and vicious accusations that you can accuse anyone of.

He's unfit! One need not be a law professor to have seen his practiced performance, it was unbecoming of a judge, and indecorous. His body language alone raised suspicion that he was not honest, he did not respond to questions asked, and used practiced answer over and over in avoiding them; his anger and the bias he expressed is sufficient alone to vote him down.

In a Court of Law Brett Kavanaugh would be innocent, a Judge would throw this out, there is NO evidence of ANY criminal acts committed by Brett Kavanaugh, in a Court of Law this would have been thrown out within MINUTES.

 

[edward37]

Five hundred liberal law professor don't think BK should be on the SC??

I'm sure BK will give their opinions all the consideration that are due.

NONE

can't stop anyone for believing in and giving protection to scum like Kavanaugh It's in republican genes

Show how Brett Kavanaugh is scum, there is no evidence that this man has not conducted his adult life in a decent way. Scum is Dianne Feinstein, scum is Debra Katz, scum is Andrew Bromwich, scum is Christine Ford, scum is the MSM human filth.

if you added trumps name I'd give you thank you

This situation if not stopped is going to set a very dangerous precedent that destroys Centuries of established legality which has always been that ANYONE is INNOCENT until proven GUILTY, this now would put that down the toilet and turn it to ANYONE is GUILTY until they prove they are INNOCENT, that ANYONE can be accused of ANYTHING with no evidence but they are given Trial By Partisan Media and then IF they defend themselves they are considered some type of psychopath and then their life is DESTROYED.

Even if he's found not guilty his crazed responses show he's far from fit for the SC

 

[edward37]

Tough shit.


The lies against Kav have had no effect. The gentleman will be a Supreme Court justice by the end of the week, and even ultra moderate GOP senators like Corker agree.

But this was an interesting experience. The Kavanaugh confirmation is a church picnic compared to what we will see when Ginsberg croaks and the Trumpster fills that seat with a conservative firebrand.

Brett Kavanaugh's young daughters have had to go through the psychological TORMENT of sitting there and having their father accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile, the Unhinged Left are Demons in human form.

SO WHY TF did he drag them in ,,to see senators kiss his ass?

If you were accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile wouldn't you get ANGRY? If not then you are not normal, 99.9% of ANYONE who was accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile would ERUPT EXACTLY like Brett Kavanaugh did, he had a normal human reaction to the most heinous and vicious accusations that you can accuse anyone of.

He's unfit! One need not be a law professor to have seen his practiced performance, it was unbecoming of a judge, and indecorous. His body language alone raised suspicion that he was not honest, he did not respond to questions asked, and used practiced answer over and over in avoiding them; his anger and the bias he expressed is sufficient alone to vote him down.

In a Court of Law Brett Kavanaugh would be innocent, a Judge would throw this out, there is NO evidence of ANY criminal acts committed by Brett Kavanaugh, in a Court of Law this would have been thrown out within MINUTES.

Not even Bill Clinton lashed out at the republican scum circling him

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The question is republican sheep ,,how many job interviews could you go on and act that way and still get the job???

I have never even heard of a job interview where witnesses show up and testify to a candidates behavior in high school. It's usually questions of substance related to the open position.

If I am ever forced to work for someone else again, they better not bring in some asshole with an ax to grind to accuse me of a bunch of shit. That is a quick way to start of fist fight.

 

[OldLady]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

Yes 500 law professors who probably ALL HATE Conservatives and The Donald.

Brett Kavanaugh was defending himself against vicious allegations, how would YOU react if you publicly in front of MILLIONS on the television were accused of being a GANG RAPIST? Would you sit there and take that OR would you get ANGRY and hit back and defend yourself? The MSM filth have even suggested that Brett Kananaugh is a paedophile, so WTF how would you react if you were accused of being a GANG RAPIST and a PAEDOPHILE?

He was not accused of either one of those things at the hearing.
Care to voice an actual argument, Lucy?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

Tough shit.


The lies against Kav have had no effect. The gentleman will be a Supreme Court justice by the end of the week, and even ultra moderate GOP senators like Corker agree.

But this was an interesting experience. The Kavanaugh confirmation is a church picnic compared to what we will see when Ginsberg croaks and the Trumpster fills that seat with a conservative firebrand.

Brett Kavanaugh's young daughters have had to go through the psychological TORMENT of sitting there and having their father accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile, the Unhinged Left are Demons in human form.

SO WHY TF did he drag them in ,,to see senators kiss his ass?

If you were accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile wouldn't you get ANGRY? If not then you are not normal, 99.9% of ANYONE who was accused of being a gang rapist and a paedophile would ERUPT EXACTLY like Brett Kavanaugh did, he had a normal human reaction to the most heinous and vicious accusations that you can accuse anyone of.

He's unfit! One need not be a law professor to have seen his practiced performance, it was unbecoming of a judge, and indecorous. His body language alone raised suspicion that he was not honest, he did not respond to questions asked, and used practiced answer over and over in avoiding them; his anger and the bias he expressed is sufficient alone to vote him down.

At least he wont fall asleep in the middle of issuing a judgment.

 

[Fang]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.


More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

When those 500 law professors names are dragged through the mud with totally made up allegations from liberals, when their family and spouses are receiving death threats, when there many, many years of hard work is being thrown in the garbage over unsubstantiated allegations I just might listen to them. Until then STFU!

 

[whitehall]

It seems that there are about 18,000 law faculty in the U.S. so the answer is "yes", 500 radical leftie professors can be (and often are) wrong.

 

[Intolerant]

That’s because he was guilty.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Even if he's found not guilty his crazed responses show he's far from fit for the SC

Like I said, the Republicans should do the same thing to every single dem nominee in the future, just to get the response they want, then disqualify said nominee.

I think it's a good plan.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Five hundred liberal law professor don't think BK should be on the SC??

I'm sure BK will give their opinions all the consideration that are due.

NONE

can't stop anyone for believing in and giving protection to scum like Kavanaugh It's in republican genes

Show how Brett Kavanaugh is scum, there is no evidence that this man has not conducted his adult life in a decent way. Scum is Dianne Feinstein, scum is Debra Katz, scum is Andrew Bromwich, scum is Christine Ford, scum is the MSM human filth.

No one needs to wonder why you support Kavanaugh, you and he are haters. Do I need to tell you that hate, especially pathological hate of those who you do not and cannot know, is particularly not healthy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Not even Bill Clinton lashed out at the republican scum circling him

He looked pretty pissed there.

 

[miketx]

POLITICS
10/02/2018 09:02 pm ET Updated 55 minutes ago
More Than 500 Law Professors Condemn Kavanaugh For ‘Lack Of Judicial Temperament’
Eight of the signatures in the letter to the Senate were from professors at Yale, where the Supreme Court nominee obtained his law degree.

By Matt Ferner

MICHAEL REYNOLDS/POOL VIA REUTERS
Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh speaks at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday.

More than 500 law professors from nearly 100 law schools around the nation have signed a letter to the U.S. Senate to say that the volatile temperament Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh displayed on Thursday as he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee disqualifies him from sitting on the nation’s highest court.

“We regret that we feel compelled to write to you to provide our views that at the Senate hearings on Thursday, September 27, 2018, the Honorable Brett Kavanaugh displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court, and certainly for elevation to the highest court of this land,” the letter says.

The letter is signed by many high-profile law professors, including eight from Yale Law School, where Kavanaugh obtained his law degree. The letter remains open for additional signatures through Thursday, when it will be presented to the Senate.

The legal experts fault Kavanaugh for failing to remain open to the necessary search for truth after being accused of sexually assaulting a girl when he was a teen and instead becoming “repeatedly aggressive with questioners.” The signees also criticize the judge for indicating that he believes allegations made by professor Christine Blasey Ford and other women are “a calculated and orchestrated political hit” by members of the Democratic Party rather than acknowledging that the Senate must try to understand and investigate the facts surrounding the allegations.

“Instead of trying to sort out with reason and care the allegations that were raised, Judge Kavanaugh responded in an intemperate, inflammatory, and partial manner, as he interrupted and, at times, was discourteous to questioners,” the letter reads. The law professors cite two statutes, governing bias and recusal, that require a judge to step aside if he or she is at risk of being perceived as being unfair.

Here’s a copy of their letter:

Signed Law Prof Kavanaugh L... by on Scribd

Yes they can be wrong. If you consider there are many times more than those 500 in the media that continually spew lies and half truths, it becomes evident that with all the evidence of misleading by the media being proven each day, that you and those of your ilk are seriously deluded or down right traitors yourselves.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Even if he's found not guilty his crazed responses show he's far from fit for the SC

Like I said, the Republicans should do the same thing to every single dem nominee in the future, just to get the response they want, then disqualify said nominee.

I think it's a good plan.

Don't lie, there is no evidence any thought went into your post.

 

[jc456]

The question is republican sheep ,,how many job interviews could you go on and act that way and still get the job???

how many job interviewers go back 36 years into childhood to vet a applicant?