LOL comprehension isn't your strongest trait is it?
I want YOU to tell me what the tenth Amendment says not what may have been debated. I want your opinion.
Maybe your memory is as faulty as your logic?
I posted the text of the 10th already. I also posted alongside it the facts of the arguments over the interpretations of the text.
You used the link that I used earlier. Now why would I provbide something that would contrdict what I have proven?
I guess you didn't read the whole sourse before youy posted thinking it was supporting your opinion.
Nonetheless, the constitutional revolution was transitory. In 1883, the Supreme Court, having already limited the Fourteenth Amendment's protections of the rights of freedmen, declared the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional on the ground that it was
“repugnant to the Tenth Amendment” (Civil Rights Cases, p. 15). During the next generation, the Court struck down a number of state exercises of the police power—in keeping with the Tenth Amendment's “prohibited by it to the states” clause—yet it never once allowed Congress to exercise a police power itself.
repugnant to the Tenth Amendment
Now what does repugnant mean?
1 : incompatible, inconsistent
2 archaic : hostile
3 : exciting distaste or aversion <repugnant language> <a morally repugnant practice>
The debate still drags on until the tenth is repealed it still the collar around the neck of the federal government. We can either pull in the government or let it run a little further out.