Calvin Coolidge born July 4 Hero to tea partiers

Status
Not open for further replies.
And Taz and his friends are resting only on opinion. OK. That's their right. But not one of them brought any evidence to the floor that is worthwhile considering. The one dork's opinion about the 10th does not matter in the slightest; his thinking is of no import. The only importance is that of SCOTUS.
 
I don't give a shit about any other arguements that have had on this discussion I want you to tell me what this means.“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
I will be waiting.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-TenthAmendment.html

"The conflict surrounding interpretation of the Tenth Amendment ..." has been around since day one and I doubt it will ever be wholly resolved to anyone's satisfaction. It came to be out of one of those compromises.

:eusa_shhh:

<sigh> Can't give an answer can you does this mean you haaven't got a clue junior as to what the tenth amendment says?

There is no debate over what the 10th says. There is debate over what the interpretations are. :cuckoo:
 
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:

I don't think so. The fact that Steele is more of an affirmative-action-come-late-appointee is not troubling to me or most others. I doubt it is discrimination. They could have chosen one of the white Racists over Steele.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. :rolleyes:
Good old Tony Perkins...bought David Duke's mailing list. Tony was a frequent guest at the Bush White House. He's a huge GOP voice.


Tony Perkins urges conservatives to stop giving money to RNC - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
 
However, it is odd that Gov Perry of Texas started talking secession within ninety days of Obama taking office. Really not giving a black man much of a chance to succeed. Now I'm sure it had nothing to do with the President being a black man....but the only other times secession was a popular topic in Texas was the Civil War and Civil Rights

Obama didn't have to take office to know who he was and what he would do. All the warning signs were out there well before the election as to who that man is and what he believes and the people he has associated himself with. Take a look around at the country right now. Looks like we were right.

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.

They are too clever to fall for that trap......instead they use the tried and true

- We didn't go to war over slavery....we went over states rights

- We don't oppose civil rights....we just believe each state should decide for themselves

- We don't oppose Obama because he is black....we oppose him because he is a marxist (got that one from Taze), hates America, is a muslim, wasn't born in America and reads a teleprompter
Nothing like a good ole race hustling session! :lol:
obamaracecard-1-LARGE.jpg
 
I don't think so. The fact that Steele is more of an affirmative-action-come-late-appointee is not troubling to me or most others. I doubt it is discrimination. They could have chosen one of the white Racists over Steele.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. :rolleyes:
Good old Tony Perkins...bought David Duke's mailing list. Tony was a frequent guest at the Bush White House. He's a huge GOP voice.


Tony Perkins urges conservatives to stop giving money to RNC - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
So what?...I quit giving money to republicans back in '95.

Steele is a nincompoop, no matter if his skin was purple.
 
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-TenthAmendment.html

"The conflict surrounding interpretation of the Tenth Amendment ..." has been around since day one and I doubt it will ever be wholly resolved to anyone's satisfaction. It came to be out of one of those compromises.

:eusa_shhh:

<sigh> Can't give an answer can you does this mean you haaven't got a clue junior as to what the tenth amendment says?

There is no debate over what the 10th says. There is debate over what the interpretations are. :cuckoo:

LOL comprehension isn't your strongest trait is it?

I want YOU to tell me what the tenth Amendment says not what may have been debated. I want your opinion.
 
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:

I don't think so. The fact that Steele is more of an affirmative-action-come-late-appointee is not troubling to me or most others. I doubt it is discrimination. They could have chosen one of the white Racists over Steele.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. :rolleyes:

The Republican's were all wee wee'd up to have their own AA guy in a top spot as I recall. However, it's worth noting that they would not have done so if the mythology of the "racist right wing" had any truth to it. Steele, like Obama is failing from his own incompetence.
 
And Taz and his friends are resting only on opinion. OK. That's their right. But not one of them brought any evidence to the floor that is worthwhile considering. The one dork's opinion about the 10th does not matter in the slightest; his thinking is of no import. The only importance is that of SCOTUS.

Junior you haven't brought anything to the discussion. So the only opion that is important is that of SCOTUS. What if SCOTUS ruled that everybody had to convert to Christianity would you still think SCOTUS had the only opinion?
 
Obama didn't have to take office to know who he was and what he would do. All the warning signs were out there well before the election as to who that man is and what he believes and the people he has associated himself with. Take a look around at the country right now. Looks like we were right.

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.

They are too clever to fall for that trap......instead they use the tried and true

- We didn't go to war over slavery....we went over states rights

- We don't oppose civil rights....we just believe each state should decide for themselves

- We don't oppose Obama because he is black....we oppose him because he is a marxist (got that one from Taze), hates America, is a muslim, wasn't born in America and reads a teleprompter
Nothing like a good ole race hustling session! :lol:
obamaracecard-1-LARGE.jpg

yeah, only a few of you had the balls to be honest and call Obama a niggar. The rest of you threw the Tea Party leader out for saying what was on other's minds.
 
<sigh> Can't give an answer can you does this mean you haaven't got a clue junior as to what the tenth amendment says?

There is no debate over what the 10th says. There is debate over what the interpretations are. :cuckoo:

LOL comprehension isn't your strongest trait is it?

I want YOU to tell me what the tenth Amendment says not what may have been debated. I want your opinion.
Maybe your memory is as faulty as your logic?

I posted the text of the 10th already. I also posted alongside it the facts of the arguments over the interpretations of the text.
 
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. :rolleyes:
Good old Tony Perkins...bought David Duke's mailing list. Tony was a frequent guest at the Bush White House. He's a huge GOP voice.


Tony Perkins urges conservatives to stop giving money to RNC - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
So what?...I quit giving money to republicans back in '95.

Steele is a nincompoop, no matter if his skin was purple.

He is not well liked within the party. He was elected by the party leadership, after more than a few ballots and much argument.

and it is obvious to many that if he were white, much of the hostility towards him from GOP members would be nonexistent if he were white.
 
Good old Tony Perkins...bought David Duke's mailing list. Tony was a frequent guest at the Bush White House. He's a huge GOP voice.


Tony Perkins urges conservatives to stop giving money to RNC - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com
So what?...I quit giving money to republicans back in '95.

Steele is a nincompoop, no matter if his skin was purple.

He is not well liked within the party. He was elected by the party leadership, after more than a few ballots and much argument.

and it is obvious to many that if he were white, much of the hostility towards him from GOP members would be nonexistent if he were white.
No, it's only "obvious" to a race hustling knuckle-dragger like you.

But thanks for showing one and all what leftist neanderthals like you really think about affirmative discrimination.
 
OH! Now I know why all you republicans get all wet when Coolidge's name comes up. He was Reagon #1. Take from the poor and give to the rich! That worked out well for everyone! Can you spell DEPRESSION?

American President: Calvin Coolidge: Impact and Legacy


Although the public liked and admired Calvin Coolidge during his tenure, the Great Depression that began in 1929, less than a year after he left office, seriously eroded his reputation and changed public opinion about his policies.
His policies that favored tax cuts for the rich seriously contributed to an unfair distribution of wealth and the overproduction of goods. By 1929, the nation had over five hundred families with incomes over $1 million, and the top fifth of the population controlled nearly 60 percent of the nation's wealth.
So Hoover-Bots cried,
"Coooooooooooooolidgggggge:?????
 
15th post
So what?...I quit giving money to republicans back in '95.

Steele is a nincompoop, no matter if his skin was purple.

He is not well liked within the party. He was elected by the party leadership, after more than a few ballots and much argument.

and it is obvious to many that if he were white, much of the hostility towards him from GOP members would be nonexistent if he were white.
No, it's only "obvious" to a race hustling knuckle-dragger like you.

But thanks for showing one and all what leftist neanderthals like you really think about affirmative discrimination.

ha.

what an idiot.
 
There is no debate over what the 10th says. There is debate over what the interpretations are. :cuckoo:

LOL comprehension isn't your strongest trait is it?

I want YOU to tell me what the tenth Amendment says not what may have been debated. I want your opinion.
Maybe your memory is as faulty as your logic?

I posted the text of the 10th already. I also posted alongside it the facts of the arguments over the interpretations of the text.

You used the link that I used earlier. Now why would I provbide something that would contrdict what I have proven?
I guess you didn't read the whole sourse before youy posted thinking it was supporting your opinion.

Nonetheless, the constitutional revolution was transitory. In 1883, the Supreme Court, having already limited the Fourteenth Amendment's protections of the rights of freedmen, declared the Civil Rights Act of 1875 unconstitutional on the ground that it was “repugnant to the Tenth Amendment” (Civil Rights Cases, p. 15). During the next generation, the Court struck down a number of state exercises of the police power—in keeping with the Tenth Amendment's “prohibited by it to the states” clause—yet it never once allowed Congress to exercise a police power itself.

repugnant to the Tenth Amendment
Now what does repugnant mean?

1 : incompatible, inconsistent
2 archaic : hostile
3 : exciting distaste or aversion <repugnant language> <a morally repugnant practice>

The debate still drags on until the tenth is repealed it still the collar around the neck of the federal government. We can either pull in the government or let it run a little further out.
 
He is not well liked within the party. He was elected by the party leadership, after more than a few ballots and much argument.

and it is obvious to many that if he were white, much of the hostility towards him from GOP members would be nonexistent if he were white.
No, it's only "obvious" to a race hustling knuckle-dragger like you.

But thanks for showing one and all what leftist neanderthals like you really think about affirmative discrimination.

ha.

what an idiot.

Projectiong again junior? I told you what you should say in the mirror 20 times a day. or have you forgotten it already?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom