Calvin Coolidge born July 4 Hero to tea partiers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Does he know what a Maccaca is? Does he know the head of the GOP under W. apologized for the GOP's blatant racism inherent in their Southern strategy?

Now Steele is being attacked like crazy.

Steele makes anti-Obama comments that the general party membership applauds, and the white leadership, many Southerners and old time racists, attack Steele as unfit, for voicing general party feelings?

Steele claimed that Afghanistan was a war of “Obama’s choosing,” and now white GOP leadership wants him to resign because of that. I guess it's killing tow niggars with one stone, eh?

Yeah, the Republicans down here are so racist that they elected Michael Steele head of the RNC in the first place. They are so racist that the South Carolina Republican Party elected a black man to be their national committeeman and the North Carolina Republican Party elected a black woman to be their national committeewoman. A black man just won the Republican nomination for South Carolina's First Congressional District and an Indian-American woman just won the Republican nomination for Governor.

You know which black person down here has been getting burned, though? Alvin Greene, the black man who won the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate and the Democrats are absolutely furious about it. I guess you were right after all. There are a lot of racists down here and they belong to the same party that owned all the slaves.

http://theinsanityreport.com/home/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/shut-the-****-up.jpeg​

Whoa. For a second there I had the name Alvin Greene mixed up with Allen West. Carry on sir. (the only thing they share even a little is a virtual MSM blackout)

A Candidate the MSM Doesn’t Want You To Know About - Big Journalism
 
In America's history there have been three instances when a significant number of states pushed states rights issues

1. Slavery

2. Civil Rights

3. The First Black President

In each case they claimed it was not about blacks and how they are treated but some vague concerns about state sovereignty

I never saw states threaten to secede over womens suffrage, abortion, the Viet Nam War... all extremely controversial issues

Nobody is seriously threatening to secede over Obama and the people that have halfheartedly brought it up haven't done so because he is black. They did it because he is a filthy ******* Marxist.

However, it is odd that Gov Perry of Texas started talking secession within ninety days of Obama taking office. Really not giving a black man much of a chance to succeed. Now I'm sure it had nothing to do with the President being a black man....but the only other times secession was a popular topic in Texas was the Civil War and Civil Rights

Don't you complain about people "making stuff up?"

So why are you doing it?
 
You made the claim: prove it. You can't. And you know you are lying. You pwn'd yourself. That is generally hard to do, though Dude does it often.

What exactly is the problem? As you yourself said, everybody here knows that I am the one who is wrong and you are right, so you should have a pretty easy time proving to me I'm wrong and yet you do not. Hmmm....... that's a mystery.

Until you can deliver, I don't think there is any point in carrying on with you further.

Nope, you made a stupid statement that you can't back up, and I am wrong? You are a supercilious twit. You pwn'd yourself.
 
neither you nor it has every kick anyones ass. You are living in a dream world. You can't even handle me junior.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: son, you are not even in the game

Junior, you may be correct I may not be in the same game as you. I think it childish to play in the midget league when I am in the big leagues.

Taz made an unsupportable claim, and I called him on it. Let him prove it. I know that you can't prove your points generally, but you recognize that already.
 
Nobody is seriously threatening to secede over Obama and the people that have halfheartedly brought it up haven't done so because he is black. They did it because he is a filthy ******* Marxist.

However, it is odd that Gov Perry of Texas started talking secession within ninety days of Obama taking office. Really not giving a black man much of a chance to succeed. Now I'm sure it had nothing to do with the President being a black man....but the only other times secession was a popular topic in Texas was the Civil War and Civil Rights

Obama didn't have to take office to know who he was and what he would do. All the warning signs were out there well before the election as to who that man is and what he believes and the people he has associated himself with. Take a look around at the country right now. Looks like we were right.

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.

They are too clever to fall for that trap......instead they use the tried and true

- We didn't go to war over slavery....we went over states rights

- We don't oppose civil rights....we just believe each state should decide for themselves

- We don't oppose Obama because he is black....we oppose him because he is a marxist (got that one from Taze), hates America, is a muslim, wasn't born in America and reads a teleprompter
 
If one were to give a tax break and cut programs to pay for the tax break it would be an example.

No it wouldn't an example because the recipients getting the benefits of said "programs" aren't earning it. It's being handed to them, therefore, it's not their money.

Try again.

Of course they are not earning benefits in the sense you are talking about it, but that does not negate the fact that we as a society give benefits to people. When we take away those benefits to give a tax break to others...

Who is to say what part of taxes we pay goes to what programs. Your argument is disingenuous at best. we all pay taxes of some sort. A progressive tax is the fairest for society as a whole. Without it you lose (an argument I hold dear) the middle class.

If stay with the simple argument about whose money taxes are after they are paid, you will get nowhere or you will see the end of society as we know it.

Why did FDR make Social Security benefits eligible to everyone? There are some wonderful reasons for this little bit of trivia. :eusa_whistle:
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: son, you are not even in the game

Junior, you may be correct I may not be in the same game as you. I think it childish to play in the midget league when I am in the big leagues.

Taz made an unsupportable claim, and I called him on it. Let him prove it. I know that you can't prove your points generally, but you recognize that already.

I know junior yada yada yada, you have all the answers, yada yada yada. Now repeat this 20 times in front of the mirror.
"I am a smart and intellgent person no one but me has the answer".
 
Is that so? Unlike you I actually live down here and I've never heard a southerner make a states' rights argument based on race.

Of course not. That is my point. Making arguments that ignore race. Like the Civil War was not really about slaves and niggars? :lol:

Lots of Southerners have come forward and apologized for Southern attitudes. Then there is the little bit of crap about the Confederacy and the flag. It's racial, yet some will ague it's about culture. Yeah, slave owning culture.

Here's a new line I heard from a Southern cracker trucker recently: " We didn't lose the Civil War. We stopped fighting so hard when we realized all you Yankees wanted was our niggars and not our women"

say's lost, without the code phrases or gymnastic word games of Southern apologists.

The state Right the South wanted, was to own other fuckin' human beings. Hundreds of thousands of people died and were crippled, to get rid of slavery.

This is 2010. That may have been the reason 150 years ago, but nobody down here makes a states' rights argument so they can own slaves, you douche. You're completely ignorant. As far as bigotry and racism goes, sure there are racists down here. There are plenty of them in Boston too.

Stop showing your IQ and show your age.

Of course there are racists in Boston, they all mostly moved to the South Shore during desegregation of Boston neighborhoods and schools. Though some moved to the North Shore. btw, where did you grow up? :lol:

My comparison was about race and state's rights you fool, not slavery. are you this stupid in real life?
 
Junior, you may be correct I may not be in the same game as you. I think it childish to play in the midget league when I am in the big leagues.

Taz made an unsupportable claim, and I called him on it. Let him prove it. I know that you can't prove your points generally, but you recognize that already.

I know junior yada yada yada, you have all the answers, yada yada yada. Now repeat this 20 times in front of the mirror.
"I am a smart and intellgent person no one but me has the answer".

Everytime you make an opinion and pretend it is evidence, I will call you on it and kick it up your ass. You reactionaries have been trying that unsuccessfully here for some time. Keep doing it and keep looking stupid.
 
Does he know what a Maccaca is? Does he know the head of the GOP under W. apologized for the GOP's blatant racism inherent in their Southern strategy?

Now Steele is being attacked like crazy.

Steele makes anti-Obama comments that the general party membership applauds, and the white leadership, many Southerners and old time racists, attack Steele as unfit, for voicing general party feelings?

Steele claimed that Afghanistan was a war of “Obama’s choosing,” and now white GOP leadership wants him to resign because of that. I guess it's killing tow niggars with one stone, eh?

Yeah, the Republicans down here are so racist that they elected Michael Steele head of the RNC in the first place. They are so racist that the South Carolina Republican Party elected a black man to be their national committeeman and the North Carolina Republican Party elected a black woman to be their national committeewoman. A black man just won the Republican nomination for South Carolina's First Congressional District and an Indian-American woman just won the Republican nomination for Governor.

You know which black person down here has been getting burned, though? Alvin Greene, the black man who won the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate and the Democrats are absolutely furious about it. I guess you were right after all. There are a lot of racists down here and they belong to the same party that owned all the slaves.

http://theinsanityreport.com/home/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/shut-the-****-up.jpeg​

:clap2:


:lol::lol::lol:


Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

---

Do you know the recent history of South Carolina politics and racism in campaigns? gawd, you are more than naive, your slow on the uptake and easily converted buy the people you surround yourself with.

I bet you'd fit right in with certain of my friends in Eastie. Some are so ignorant it is only because I call them family, that I don't throw them overboard on a ship in the ocean. So maybe you really are from the Boston area. :lol:
 
No ms. thang you fail to understand basic english your comprehension skill's are way to low to keep up with normals standards of a 9th grader.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Tell me what this means?

There have been arguments over what this means since day one. You fail to acknowledge this fact. You insist the meanings of the words is teh interpretation.

Both Madison and Hamilton disagreed with themselves and each other over this very point.

You are arguing the words out of teh context of the document. Does the Constituton's words mean what the people who ratified the document, in each individual state, thought they meant? Do the words mean what the authors understood them to mean? Do the words have their own meanings irrespective of what the signers and authors meant them to mean?

The above questions and more have been pondered and argued over by the very men who wrote and signed the document. How the hell can you say you know what they mean in the context of the Constitution?

I don't give a shit about any other arguements that have had on this discussion I want you to tell me what this means.“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
I will be waiting.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-TenthAmendment.html

"The conflict surrounding interpretation of the Tenth Amendment ..." has been around since day one and I doubt it will ever be wholly resolved to anyone's satisfaction. It came to be out of one of those compromises.

:eusa_shhh:
 
Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

Hot Air Steele dodges bullet?

Steele has worked for years among activists, attending conferences and building enthusiasm for conservative causes. Steele ran for the US Senate and lost in a tough year for Republicans, and also hosted a talk-radio show for years. They didn’t “come up with” Steele; he has been there a long time.
 
Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

Hot Air Steele dodges bullet?

Steele has worked for years among activists, attending conferences and building enthusiasm for conservative causes. Steele ran for the US Senate and lost in a tough year for Republicans, and also hosted a talk-radio show for years. They didn’t “come up with” Steele; he has been there a long time.
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:
 
Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

Hot Air Steele dodges bullet?

Steele has worked for years among activists, attending conferences and building enthusiasm for conservative causes. Steele ran for the US Senate and lost in a tough year for Republicans, and also hosted a talk-radio show for years. They didn’t “come up with” Steele; he has been there a long time.

you ought to get together with that idiot taz.

---

Breaking: RNC Elects First Black Republican Party Chairman | NowPublic News Coverage


Today, January 30, 2009, during the 2009 Republican National Committee's (RNC) annual winter meeting, being held in Washington, D.C., from January 28 through January 31, 2009, the RNC is voting to elect a new chairman for the Republican Party.

168 members and proxies are eligible to vote during this election. 85 votes are required to represent a majority.

The candidates for Republican Party Chairman are: Mike Duncan, Ken Blackwell, Katon Dawson, Michael Steele and Saul Anuzis.


I wonder if you know who kept getting the most votes?

---
A Reality Check for the Republican Party | NowPublic News Coverage


The article cites the recent election of a white supremacist to the Palm Beach County Republican Executive Committee in Florida and the most recent action that has raised more than a few eyebrows, resulting in condemnation from the current Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan, the distribution of a CD titled We Hate the USA to RNC committee members by Republican Chip Saltsman.
 
Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

Hot Air Steele dodges bullet?

Steele has worked for years among activists, attending conferences and building enthusiasm for conservative causes. Steele ran for the US Senate and lost in a tough year for Republicans, and also hosted a talk-radio show for years. They didn’t “come up with” Steele; he has been there a long time.
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:

I don't think so. The fact that Steele is more of an affirmative-action-come-late-appointee is not troubling to me or most others. I doubt it is discrimination. They could have chosen one of the white Racists over Steele.
 
15th post
Steele was the GOP answer to Obama. They never liked him. Do you know h-o-w he got elected Chairman? Do you know the inside dope on the process? :lol:

gawd, you're naive more than stupid. I apologize for insulting stupid people everywhere.

Hot Air Steele dodges bullet?

Steele has worked for years among activists, attending conferences and building enthusiasm for conservative causes. Steele ran for the US Senate and lost in a tough year for Republicans, and also hosted a talk-radio show for years. They didn’t “come up with” Steele; he has been there a long time.
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:

All 100% correct. I only objected to "they never liked him".

:lol:
 
There have been arguments over what this means since day one. You fail to acknowledge this fact. You insist the meanings of the words is teh interpretation.

Both Madison and Hamilton disagreed with themselves and each other over this very point.

You are arguing the words out of teh context of the document. Does the Constituton's words mean what the people who ratified the document, in each individual state, thought they meant? Do the words mean what the authors understood them to mean? Do the words have their own meanings irrespective of what the signers and authors meant them to mean?

The above questions and more have been pondered and argued over by the very men who wrote and signed the document. How the hell can you say you know what they mean in the context of the Constitution?

I don't give a shit about any other arguements that have had on this discussion I want you to tell me what this means.“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
I will be waiting.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O184-TenthAmendment.html

"The conflict surrounding interpretation of the Tenth Amendment ..." has been around since day one and I doubt it will ever be wholly resolved to anyone's satisfaction. It came to be out of one of those compromises.

:eusa_shhh:

<sigh> Can't give an answer can you does this mean you haaven't got a clue junior as to what the tenth amendment says?
 
Obama didn't have to take office to know who he was and what he would do. All the warning signs were out there well before the election as to who that man is and what he believes and the people he has associated himself with. Take a look around at the country right now. Looks like we were right.

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.

They are too clever to fall for that trap......instead they use the tried and true

- We didn't go to war over slavery....we went over states rights

- We don't oppose civil rights....we just believe each state should decide for themselves

- We don't oppose Obama because he is black....we oppose him because he is a marxist (got that one from Taze), hates America, is a muslim, wasn't born in America and reads a teleprompter

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.
 
Steele has been a GOPAC/Gingrich neoconnie boot licker since at least the early '90s....Like the GOP nominating Juan McQuisling and Bob Olde, it was "his turn".

But check it out....The republicans play a little of their own affirmative discrimination, and the usual lefty hand-wringers get a broom up their ass about someone getting chosen to a high position.......because he's black!

The sanctimony is so thick you need a chain saw to get through it. :lol:

I don't think so. The fact that Steele is more of an affirmative-action-come-late-appointee is not troubling to me or most others. I doubt it is discrimination. They could have chosen one of the white Racists over Steele.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom