Calvin Coolidge born July 4 Hero to tea partiers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Taz, you are absolutely ignorant if you believe what you are writing.
 
In America's history there have been three instances when a significant number of states pushed states rights issues

1. Slavery

2. Civil Rights

3. The First Black President

In each case they claimed it was not about blacks and how they are treated but some vague concerns about state sovereignty

I never saw states threaten to secede over womens suffrage, abortion, the Viet Nam War... all extremely controversial issues

Nobody is seriously threatening to secede over Obama and the people that have halfheartedly brought it up haven't done so because he is black. They did it because he is a filthy ******* Marxist.
 
:lol:

and some people insist on calling traitors like Jefferson Davis, heroes.

ssohthehorror.png


If Jefferson is a traitor what did he betray? Straky's arguement was that the states were soverign and could govern themself. until after the civil war So if Jefferson betrayed something it would have been with his state if he had not stayed with it.
What did Jefferson Davis betray? :cuckoo:

gawd, you're a nullifying segregationist?

WOW YOU ARE TO INCOMPATANT TO HAVE A DISCUSSION WITH. THAT IS IF YOU THINK SEGREGATION WAS THE REASON FOR THE CIVIL WAR. Holy shit batman we have a mental midget.
 
What makes me "sad", Taz, is that you are a namby-bamby asswipe. Let's chug on over to mamby bamby land and get some awareness for you, son. You are a jackass.
 
Last edited:
Taz, you are absolutely ignorant if you believe what you are writing.

Like I said. You're free to prove it at anytime. I'm not stopping you.

If that is only your opinion, you are entitled to it, and every 'thinking person here knows that you are wrong, and I imagine some believe you are lying through your ass. You have pwn'd yourself.
 
In America's history there have been three instances when a significant number of states pushed states rights issues

1. Slavery

2. Civil Rights

3. The First Black President

In each case they claimed it was not about blacks and how they are treated but some vague concerns about state sovereignty

I never saw states threaten to secede over womens suffrage, abortion, the Viet Nam War... all extremely controversial issues

Nobody is seriously threatening to secede over Obama and the people that have halfheartedly brought it up haven't done so because he is black. They did it because he is a filthy ******* Marxist.

However, it is odd that Gov Perry of Texas started talking secession within ninety days of Obama taking office. Really not giving a black man much of a chance to succeed. Now I'm sure it had nothing to do with the President being a black man....but the only other times secession was a popular topic in Texas was the Civil War and Civil Rights
 
Taz, you are absolutely ignorant if you believe what you are writing.

Like I said. You're free to prove it at anytime. I'm not stopping you.

If that is only your opinion, you are entitled to it, and every 'thinking person here knows that you are wrong, and I imagine some believe you are lying through your ass. You have pwn'd yourself.
Another grand self-declaration of victory by Jake the Fake!

You going to build a new display case for all the trophies you're awarding yourself? :lol::lol::lol:
 
You fail to grasp even the most basic of principles. Your private reality keeps you from reading and comprehending the most basic posts and links provided by those you assume disagree with you.

You are incapable of distinguishing things because you do not read and comprehend. I suspect you scan and shoot from the lisp. :eusa_whistle:

No ms. thang you fail to understand basic english your comprehension skill's are way to low to keep up with normals standards of a 9th grader.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Tell me what this means?

There have been arguments over what this means since day one. You fail to acknowledge this fact. You insist the meanings of the words is teh interpretation.

Both Madison and Hamilton disagreed with themselves and each other over this very point.

You are arguing the words out of teh context of the document. Does the Constituton's words mean what the people who ratified the document, in each individual state, thought they meant? Do the words mean what the authors understood them to mean? Do the words have their own meanings irrespective of what the signers and authors meant them to mean?

The above questions and more have been pondered and argued over by the very men who wrote and signed the document. How the hell can you say you know what they mean in the context of the Constitution?

I don't give a shit about any other arguements that have had on this discussion I want you to tell me what this means.“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
I will be waiting.
 
Taz, you are absolutely ignorant if you believe what you are writing.

Like I said. You're free to prove it at anytime. I'm not stopping you.

If that is only your opinion, you are entitled to it, and every 'thinking person here knows that you are wrong, and I imagine some believe you are lying through your ass. You have pwn'd yourself.

Like I said. You're free to prove it at anytime. I'm not stopping you.
 
You made the claim: prove it. You can't. And you know you are lying. You pwn'd yourself. That is generally hard to do, though Dude does it often.
 
Yea.....tell it to Jefferson Davis

Just because the south lost the war doesn't mean I do not have the right to invoke the tenth amendment. Unless you are saying it's repealed.

You cannot invoke anything....you lack legal standing

However, if your state wishes to challenge, they are welcome to take it up with the courts. Just like states have attempted for the last 150 years

Good luck

Are you saying I have no representation?
 
In America's history there have been three instances when a significant number of states pushed states rights issues

1. Slavery

2. Civil Rights

3. The First Black President

In each case they claimed it was not about blacks and how they are treated but some vague concerns about state sovereignty

I never saw states threaten to secede over womens suffrage, abortion, the Viet Nam War... all extremely controversial issues

Nobody is seriously threatening to secede over Obama and the people that have halfheartedly brought it up haven't done so because he is black. They did it because he is a filthy ******* Marxist.

However, it is odd that Gov Perry of Texas started talking secession within ninety days of Obama taking office. Really not giving a black man much of a chance to succeed. Now I'm sure it had nothing to do with the President being a black man....but the only other times secession was a popular topic in Texas was the Civil War and Civil Rights

Obama didn't have to take office to know who he was and what he would do. All the warning signs were out there well before the election as to who that man is and what he believes and the people he has associated himself with. Take a look around at the country right now. Looks like we were right.

You're free to find a quote from Rick Perry or any other southern Republican politician stating that they oppose Obama because he is black. Be my guest. Good luck with that one.
 
Poor deflection, Taz. Are just stupid, son?
 
15th post
You made the claim: prove it. You can't. And you know you are lying. You pwn'd yourself. That is generally hard to do, though Dude does it often.

What exactly is the problem? As you yourself said, everybody here knows that I am the one who is wrong and you are right, so you should have a pretty easy time proving to me I'm wrong and yet you do not. Hmmm....... that's a mystery.

Until you can deliver, I don't think there is any point in carrying on with you further.
 
I never said it was all about racism. Yet, almost all state's rights arguments made by Southerners concern issues based on race.

Is that so? Unlike you I actually live down here and I've never heard a southerner make a states' rights argument based on race.

You must remember that to weaken the facts the left and defenders of big government must always use their crutch of racism.

Without that they have no arguement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom