On April 8th you posted the following comment to the
Affirmative action, helpful or harmful thread
This doesn't' make sense. What you learn in college shouldn't be for naught and will I understand obtaining one's degree is the goal and not achieving it hurts (i left college before I got my degree but eventually went back and completed) but your whole life should then end up with you only being able to earn minimum wage.
Our experiences are so different I can't even wrap my mind around this. I thought you said you ended up working in the computer industry. No one works for minimum wage in IT unless they are just entering the industry and even then they don't stay at minimum wage for long.
So are you white or not because you said "despite being a minority race"? The rest of your comment is just sad if that's how you genuinely feel about your fellow citizens. And just an FYI, the reason they ask those question is not so they can identify & then hire minorities, it's so that the program can report back to their funding agency how many people they have served by race, gender, ethnic background, etc. so that they continue to be appropriated more budget money. There are a lot more things going on behind the scenes than you are aware of and believe me more of it has to do with money and keeping it flowing [in] that actual racial preferences.
Another poster here once made the comment to another poster than he believed him to be moreso ignorant than a racist. Although a lot of people believe the word Ignorance to be derogatory term, it simply means being unaware of something or not being knowledgeable of a particular topic. The thing is Ignorance can be cured with factual information so when people who might seem at first blush to be racist are presented with
factual information (not opinion) and they then continue to make racists comments it may be inferred that they are indeed racist.
You and the others here have been presented with a plethora of factual information yet you continue to attack the messengers even taking things further and referring to us as racists simply because we keep presenting factual information in an attempt to counter the misconceptions, lies, etc. being spread about black people in general and us specifically.
This process is called jury nullification and originated in the south by whites. I have no knowledge of it being employed in any significant way by blacks
In 1955, two white men went on trial in Mississippi for the
murder of Emmett Till, a black 14-year-old from Chicago who supposedly had been too friendly to a white woman. In the Jim Crow South, there was never much chance of conviction, and they were acquitted by a jury that deliberated for barely an hour. The two men, free of the danger of prosecution, later acknowledged their guilt. That case and many like it are worth keeping in mind in any consideration of the place of jury nullification in the criminal justice system.
Let there be no mistake about it, racist juries routinely failed to deliver justice in the Jim Crow South. And jury injustice sometimes happens today when, for example,
juries acquit police caught on video brutalizing defenseless citizens.
I haven't seen ANY information from you, or Mr. white-hater, to add to my bank of knowledge. I've told both of you that the only racial discrimination of any significant magnitude, over the past 50 years is Affirmative Action discrimination against whites (and sometimes other races too), with blacks being the beneficiaries.
As beneficiaries of this social disease, you have no complaints. Only thing for you all to do is apologize and pay remittances$$$$$$$$$ to the whites you have caused hardship to, by pushing and supporting Affirmative Action.
I don't know why you have a problem with what I said previously. Everything I said is 100% true & accurate, I stand behind it 100%, and I say it again right now. What cant you understand ? I (et al) was forced to drop out of graduate school, because of the denial of financial aid (which was only given to blacks) - racial discrimination, pure & simple.
Why are you talking about minimum wage ? You yourself posted that I said I made $11/hour. That (in the 1980s) is a lot more than MW (which was $3.35/hour back then) And the only reason I made more money, was because, after leaving college, I took a vocational course (mechanical trades) to qualify for better jobs (in the computer industry)
LOL. Pathetic how you fall for the dumbest line in America>> that AA questionnaire is just for statistics. EARTH TO NVM: AA is to give PREFERENCE to blacks over all other races. The statistics line is a laughable red herring, designed to ward off criticism of AA discrimination. You're the first person I've heard actually believe it, and repeat it, since 1988.
Juries acquit police because those police shot people in SELF-DEFENSE, because those fools didn't keep their HANDS VISIBLE & EMPTY. Dumbass liberal teachers, clueless about guns and law enforcement, don't teach kids how to act with police. That's why these guys are getting shot. Oh, so they're "unarmed" are they ? Well how the hell is the cop supposed to know that, when the suspect guy's hands disappear from view ?
You know how long it take to whip a gun out of a pocket or a car window, and fire it ? About a 1/2 second. Cop has a right to defend him/herself. You let your hands disappear to a cop pointing gun at you, and you are going to be shot, and probably die, as cops are rightfully trained to aim for center mass of the body (heart and lungs)
Also, there is no such thing as "unarmed". Guys who have been shot by cops and referred to as "unarmed" by the media, have been found carrying ballpoint pens, golf balls, wearing belts, and standing next to golf ball size rocks on the ground (all DEADLY weapons).
PS - this post I'm responding to, was the worst mess I've ever seen. Questions and quotes were mixed up all over the place. You need to learn how to sort out your stuff, so we don't have to do it for you, in order to respond to you.