California votes to allow discrimination?

[Votto]

California Legislature Votes to Allow Discrimination by Race, Gender, National Origin

This week, the legislature in California voted to remove the constitutional prohibition on “di

pjmedia.com

Yes friends, it has come to this in Looneyland.


California just voted to allow racial and gender discrimination in all its public activities. The bill will move to the ballot in November for a popular vote.

I'll give you two guesses on who they are chomping at the bit to discriminate against.

California has set the country back nearly half a century.

 

[Votto]

I have never heard a Republican politicians talk down to people due to their race.

I don't hear Republicans talk about race during their national debates as they primary.

But what I do hear the Left and democrats talk about race more than the former Nazi party did.

 

[Muhammed]

Anyone want to guess who they are planning on discriminating against?

 

[bripat9643]

Anyone want to guess who they are planning on discriminating against?

 

[Norman]

Conservatives have a lot to learn. No democrat cares even a little bit if he is called a racist (or is a racist for that matter - in fact they take pride in that).

 

[martybegan]

California Legislature Votes to Allow Discrimination by Race, Gender, National Origin

This week, the legislature in California voted to remove the constitutional prohibition on “di

pjmedia.com

Yes friends, it has come to this in Looneyland.


California just voted to allow racial and gender discrimination in all its public activities. The bill will move to the ballot in November for a popular vote.

I'll give you two guesses on who they are chomping at the bit to discriminate against.

California has set the country back nearly half a century.

California wants to do what other Blue States do, set up MBE/WBE/DBE (minority/women/disadvantaged owned) business programs, that require a certain amount of government contracts and subcontracts within government contracts (sometimes up to 25%) be given to said businesses.

What it often does it create a racket of "shell" companies, and things like some white guy making his wife "president" of the company so they can be subcontractors.

The issue is that they often set the goal based on total contract value, and then limit the overall subcontract value based on contract value. So 25% of your contract value has to be subcontracted to MBE/WBE/DBE subs, but you only get to subcontract our 30% of the overall value of the contract.

Guess what businesses get left out?

 

[danielpalos]

California Legislature Votes to Allow Discrimination by Race, Gender, National Origin

This week, the legislature in California voted to remove the constitutional prohibition on “di

pjmedia.com

Yes friends, it has come to this in Looneyland.


California just voted to allow racial and gender discrimination in all its public activities. The bill will move to the ballot in November for a popular vote.

I'll give you two guesses on who they are chomping at the bit to discriminate against.

California has set the country back nearly half a century.

The right wing is clueless and Causeless and don't even understand the language or the Constitution.

Text of Section 7 California State Constitution:
(a) A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

Article 4, Section 2 US Constitution:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

 

[TNHarley]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

 

[martybegan]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

It won't be. It's done in States like NY and NJ all the time. I work in the public sector construction industry so I know it first hand.

They make it sound like the quotas are "goals", not set in stone numbers, but good luck winning a contract if you don't meet your "goals" when it comes to minority/women/disadvantaged owned subcontractors.

MWBE Goals | New York State Division of Human Rights

 

[Harry Dresden]

California Legislature Votes to Allow Discrimination by Race, Gender, National Origin

This week, the legislature in California voted to remove the constitutional prohibition on “di

pjmedia.com

Yes friends, it has come to this in Looneyland.


California just voted to allow racial and gender discrimination in all its public activities. The bill will move to the ballot in November for a popular vote.

I'll give you two guesses on who they are chomping at the bit to discriminate against.

California has set the country back nearly half a century.

The right wing is clueless and Causeless and don't even understand the language or the Constitution.

Text of Section 7 California State Constitution:
(a) A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

Article 4, Section 2 US Constitution:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

says the guy who had no idea where Ellis Island was located....

 

[danielpalos]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

You understand that unregulated Capitalism is only about inequality and scarcity not equality or equal protection of the laws?

 

[danielpalos]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

It won't be. It's done in States like NY and NJ all the time. I work in the public sector construction industry so I know it first hand.

They make it sound like the quotas are "goals", not set in stone numbers, but good luck winning a contract if you don't meet your "goals" when it comes to minority/women/disadvantaged owned subcontractors.

MWBE Goals | New York State Division of Human Rights

Only right wingers have a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States and engender poverty as a result.

Raise the minimum wage until even the Poor can afford adequate housing with no need for government Regulations, right wingers. Equal protection of our at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can mean less need for those types of Regulation of Commerce.

 

[TNHarley]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

You understand that unregulated Capitalism is only about inequality and scarcity not equality or equal protection of the laws?

Unregulated capitalism is redundant. I dont expect you to understand what that means.

 

[TNHarley]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

It won't be. It's done in States like NY and NJ all the time. I work in the public sector construction industry so I know it first hand.

They make it sound like the quotas are "goals", not set in stone numbers, but good luck winning a contract if you don't meet your "goals" when it comes to minority/women/disadvantaged owned subcontractors.

MWBE Goals | New York State Division of Human Rights

Only right wingers have a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States and engender poverty as a result.

Raise the minimum wage until even the Poor can afford adequate housing with no need for government Regulations, right wingers. Equal protection of our at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can mean less need for those types of Regulation of Commerce.

Raising the minimum wage is a regulation, you dolt

 

[danielpalos]

California Legislature Votes to Allow Discrimination by Race, Gender, National Origin

This week, the legislature in California voted to remove the constitutional prohibition on “di

pjmedia.com

Yes friends, it has come to this in Looneyland.


California just voted to allow racial and gender discrimination in all its public activities. The bill will move to the ballot in November for a popular vote.

I'll give you two guesses on who they are chomping at the bit to discriminate against.

California has set the country back nearly half a century.

The right wing is clueless and Causeless and don't even understand the language or the Constitution.

Text of Section 7 California State Constitution:
(a) A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws

Article 4, Section 2 US Constitution:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

The State of California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

says the guy who had no idea where Ellis Island was located....

Says the guy who could not understand the point or the argument, Capitalism and our Commerce clause simply because we have no express Immigration clause in our federal Constitution. Only national socialist Right Wingers eschew Capitalism at Every opportunity while only allegedly being for Capitalism in socialism threads.

 

[danielpalos]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

You understand that unregulated Capitalism is only about inequality and scarcity not equality or equal protection of the laws?

Unregulated capitalism is redundant. I dont expect you to understand what that means.

I don't expect you to understand how to reduce the need for Regulation, only parroting right wing ignorance, propaganda and rhetoric.

 

[danielpalos]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

It won't be. It's done in States like NY and NJ all the time. I work in the public sector construction industry so I know it first hand.

They make it sound like the quotas are "goals", not set in stone numbers, but good luck winning a contract if you don't meet your "goals" when it comes to minority/women/disadvantaged owned subcontractors.

MWBE Goals | New York State Division of Human Rights

Only right wingers have a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States and engender poverty as a result.

Raise the minimum wage until even the Poor can afford adequate housing with no need for government Regulations, right wingers. Equal protection of our at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can mean less need for those types of Regulation of Commerce.

Raising the minimum wage is a regulation, you dolt

Capitalism has a Natural rate of unemployment that must be solved for to promote the general welfare.

Raising the minimum wage until the Poor don't need social services can only reduce the Cost of Government.

 

[TNHarley]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

You understand that unregulated Capitalism is only about inequality and scarcity not equality or equal protection of the laws?

Unregulated capitalism is redundant. I dont expect you to understand what that means.

I don't expect you to understand how to reduce the need for Regulation, only parroting right wing ignorance, propaganda and rhetoric.

Im not parroting anything. Good gawd man. Lay off the crack. Get some sleep. Eat something.
Make sense for once

 

[TNHarley]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

It won't be. It's done in States like NY and NJ all the time. I work in the public sector construction industry so I know it first hand.

They make it sound like the quotas are "goals", not set in stone numbers, but good luck winning a contract if you don't meet your "goals" when it comes to minority/women/disadvantaged owned subcontractors.

MWBE Goals | New York State Division of Human Rights

Only right wingers have a problem with equality and equal protection of the laws in our at-will employment States and engender poverty as a result.

Raise the minimum wage until even the Poor can afford adequate housing with no need for government Regulations, right wingers. Equal protection of our at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation in our at-will employment States can mean less need for those types of Regulation of Commerce.

Raising the minimum wage is a regulation, you dolt

Capitalism has a Natural rate of unemployment that must be solved for to promote the general welfare.

Raising the minimum wage until the Poor don't need social services can only reduce the Cost of Government.

So raising the minimum wage will end the poor people handout? Lmao

 

[danielpalos]

Discrimination doesnt bother me unless it comes from the public sector.
Of course, this goes against federal unconstitutional law.
It will be challenged if people start being treated differently.

You understand that unregulated Capitalism is only about inequality and scarcity not equality or equal protection of the laws?

Unregulated capitalism is redundant. I dont expect you to understand what that means.

I don't expect you to understand how to reduce the need for Regulation, only parroting right wing ignorance, propaganda and rhetoric.

Im not parroting anything. Good gawd man. Lay off the crack. Get some sleep. Eat something.
Make sense for once

Yes, you are. Nobody who understand anything about economics takes the right wing seriously. Socialism on a national basis is all the right wing actually understands.