California School Has ‘Condom Race’ Where 10-Year-Old Girls Learn How to Put On Condoms

[Picaro]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

 

[SweetSue92]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

 

[SweetSue92]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

Yeah cause they're workbooks. Like the kind of workbooks we did in the 70s and 80s that parents who are not teachers think work great, cause we did them in the 70s and 80s.

Then these parents think, "hey I went to public school and hated it..." but they somehow think using the VERY SAME METHODS they did is a win.

you know. I just shake my head.

 

[toobfreak]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

If you think about it, school used to prepare you for the world, college was a separate, optional thing some people went to for additional specialized training for particular advanced fields. Now school only prepares you for college and it is assumed that college will prepare you for the world. Yet even these grads are often still only poorly educated in many basic things.

When you really look at it, the average 4 year college grad of today is still rather an idiot about most things with only a narrowly functional understanding about a few things specifically pertaining to their field. In effect, a close examination of education shows that at one time, grade school produced a very well rounded individual capable of going in many directions that is equivalent to the 4 year college grad of today. In contrast, the high school grad of today is more akin to the 8th grader of yesteryear.

So when an employer says "4-year degree" required, they are really speaking of the grad of today. What we have created in the USA is a self-serving system whereby first the taxpayer is ransacked of money for 12 years then forced into a bloated educational system one of the most expensive in the world yet providing an education about 20th on the list that keeps the taxpayer in debt almost their entire lives in order to get educated enough to open a door into a very narrow, limited field which is increasing paying less and less to where not only isn't healthcare no longer included, but it requires BOTH parents to work to afford to get by!

And of course, since both parents are working, neither can be home educating their children themselves, must pay for daycare, thereby further making them dependent on the system.

 

[SweetSue92]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

If you think about it, school used to prepare you for the world, college was a separate, optional thing some people went to for additional specialized training for particular advanced fields. Now school only prepares you for college and it is assumed that college will prepare you for the world. Yet even these grads are often still only poorly educated in many basic things.

When you really look at it, the average 4 year college grad of today is still rather an idiot about most things with only a narrowly functional understanding about a few things specifically pertaining to their field. In effect, a close examination of education shows that at one time, grade school produced a very well rounded individual capable of going in many directions that is equivalent to the 4 year college grad of today. In contrast, the high school grad of today is more akin to the 8th grader of yesteryear.

So when an employer says "4-year degree" required, they are really speaking of the grad of today. What we have created in the USA is a self-serving system whereby first the taxpayer is ransacked of money for 12 years then forced into a bloated educational system one of the most expensive in the world yet providing an education about 20th on the list that keeps the taxpayer in debt almost their entire lives in order to get educated enough to open a door into a very narrow, limited field which is increasing paying less and less to where not only isn't healthcare no longer included, but it requires BOTH parents to work to afford to get by!

And of course, since both parents are working, neither can be home educating their children themselves, must pay for daycare, thereby further making them dependent on the system.

You're doing a lot of spitballing here.

What is really happening in the schools is exactly what is happening in our society: the disparity in income, class and etc is stark and both have deep problems. On one hand you have disadvantaged kids coming to school wholly unready to learn. OTOH you have kids whose parents are ready to do everything for them, including cook, do laundry and sew buttons so that kids go to college knowing nothing practical.

We have to decide as a society who is responsible for actually RAISING our children. Right now teachers are expected to do this in addition to teaching. And the blistering teacher shortage, which is only going to get worse, is an indication that it's just too much of a job, especially when all people do is bash you for it no matter what you do.

 

[theHawk]

In the Brave New World utopia run by leftwing neo-Marxists, individuals don’t have the right to deny anyone access to their body. So parents certainly have no say in what happens to their child, all the power is given to the state to raise and educate-.....I mean indoctrinate the children.

 

[Likkmee]

The real trick is mouth installation without the guy knowing you did it. I suppose that'll be third semester stuff,

 

[Penelope]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

 

[SweetSue92]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

 

[Penelope]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

 

[SweetSue92]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

 

[Penelope]

What the **** is the matter with education asshole in Kalipornia?....Next thing is BLOW JOB 101 so you can insure that your 10 year old girl doesn't get pregnant.... What have we become?



by Sheri Urban

Outrage is growing in California against newly approved sex education materials in public schools.

“It’s shocking,” Rebecca Friedrichs, the founder of For Kids & Country, told The Christian Post.


She said one school had 10- and 11-year-old girls participate in a “condom race” in which they ran, in front of male classmates, to be the first to put a condom on a model of an erect adult male penis.



“I always tell people that the scary thing is, I’ll give radio interviews and I can’t even say on the radio things that are being taught in our elementary and middle school classrooms in mixed company. There’s something very wrong there,” she said.



Friedrichs has helped to organize several local and state-wide parent protests against the new materials.



Concerns center around changes approved by the California Board of Education in May. The programs are supposed to comply with the 2015 California Healthy Youth Act, “which mandates the teaching of ‘medically accurate’ and ‘age appropriate’ comprehensive sex education at least once in middle school and once in high school,” according to the report.

Here’s more from the report:

(Excerpt) Read more at us24news.com ...

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

 

[SweetSue92]

That would be an automatic opt-out for me and I hope tons and tons of parents do the very same and send a strong message to the totalitarians who run that state.

Absolutely not

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

A notable exception is California where hospitals and safety advocates have instituted practices that have cut the state's maternal death rate in half.

"They're one of the early adopters where an organization out there has really pushed hospitals to follow these evidence-based best practices," Young said.

California had the least number of maternal deaths over the study period with 4.0 for every 100,000 births.

The states with the lowest maternal death rates include:

1. California

USA Today investigation ranks states with the highest maternal death rates

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

 

[Penelope]

I think its wonderful. They should have more sex ed. Better than getting an unwanted pregnancy, don't you think? Or spreading around some STD's.

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

Well the parents are not doing their jobs, so yes when they have a mandatory class , its needs to be mandatory, just like reading writing and arithmetic. Now now, do not change the subject.

 

[SweetSue92]

Will you check girls' papers to make sure they took their birth control that day, Penny???

Or what job WILL you have in the camps

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

Well the parents are not doing their jobs, so yes when they have a mandatory class , its needs to be mandatory, just like reading writing and arithmetic. Now now, do not change the subject.

Well it's not Jackboots. Parents can opt their kids out.

You need to find a totalitarian state to live in. America ain't it.

 

[Penelope]

What age do you want little girls and boys to learn about the birds and the bees, and STD's??

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

Well the parents are not doing their jobs, so yes when they have a mandatory class , its needs to be mandatory, just like reading writing and arithmetic. Now now, do not change the subject.

Well it's not Jackboots. Parents can opt their kids out.

You need to find a totalitarian state to live in. America ain't it.

Why are there so many abortions and STD's. Is it because those Christian parents do not want to admit their holy children are doing the "dirty deed" ??

 

[SassyIrishLass]

At whatever age their parents deem it appropriate

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

Well the parents are not doing their jobs, so yes when they have a mandatory class , its needs to be mandatory, just like reading writing and arithmetic. Now now, do not change the subject.

Well it's not Jackboots. Parents can opt their kids out.

You need to find a totalitarian state to live in. America ain't it.

Why are there so many abortions and STD's. Is it because those Christian parents do not want to admit their holy children are doing the "dirty deed" ??

Maybe you can provide statistics on that?

We both know you're full of fcking shit

 

[Penelope]

No, their parents are not doing a good job, if they were, they would need sex ed in schools. Leaving it up to the parents would produce abortions and STD's, two issues you want to avoid.

So you think the State should be in charge of the kids.

Hey Penelope. You know who else thought the State should be in charge of the kids? OH that's right, The Reich you think never committed the Holocaust. Nevermind

Well the parents are not doing their jobs, so yes when they have a mandatory class , its needs to be mandatory, just like reading writing and arithmetic. Now now, do not change the subject.

Well it's not Jackboots. Parents can opt their kids out.

You need to find a totalitarian state to live in. America ain't it.

Why are there so many abortions and STD's. Is it because those Christian parents do not want to admit their holy children are doing the "dirty deed" ??

Maybe you can provide statistics on that?

We both know you're full of fcking shit

I don't need to. We know abortions are rampant and STDS area also rampant. If you want to look up the stats be my guess.

 

[Picaro]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

If you think about it, school used to prepare you for the world, college was a separate, optional thing some people went to for additional specialized training for particular advanced fields. Now school only prepares you for college and it is assumed that college will prepare you for the world. Yet even these grads are often still only poorly educated in many basic things.

When you really look at it, the average 4 year college grad of today is still rather an idiot about most things with only a narrowly functional understanding about a few things specifically pertaining to their field. In effect, a close examination of education shows that at one time, grade school produced a very well rounded individual capable of going in many directions that is equivalent to the 4 year college grad of today. In contrast, the high school grad of today is more akin to the 8th grader of yesteryear.

So when an employer says "4-year degree" required, they are really speaking of the grad of today. What we have created in the USA is a self-serving system whereby first the taxpayer is ransacked of money for 12 years then forced into a bloated educational system one of the most expensive in the world yet providing an education about 20th on the list that keeps the taxpayer in debt almost their entire lives in order to get educated enough to open a door into a very narrow, limited field which is increasing paying less and less to where not only isn't healthcare no longer included, but it requires BOTH parents to work to afford to get by!

And of course, since both parents are working, neither can be home educating their children themselves, must pay for daycare, thereby further making them dependent on the system.

the right wing insists on making sure working people can't survive any more on one income earner. They're shooting themselves in the foot with their fanatic class warfare agendas; people just don't go quietly into the night and die in appropriate numbers to suits the Social Darwinists, they vote or they riot or they form criminal street gangs, and they get more expensive rather than cheaper. This is why the moderates are squeezed and the right can only get a few percentage points ahead and are going to lose elections where they should be winning by landslides, not 3 percentage points or less. they can keep repeating talking points they like to hear, or they can make genuine appeals to moderates and win elections with no problem; that's the choices they face now, and no amount of whining is going to change that in the near future. It's going to take a couple or more decades to roll back the damage both the left and right wing nutjobs have inflicted, if it's even possible to do so now.

 

[Picaro]

Home schooling programs are cheap compared to school systems, which of course makes one wonder why they don't just use them in public schools as well, since they're much cheaper, except for the high school level labs and that sort of equipment. And besides, the Feds are paying an increasingly small percentage of local school districts' funding anyway, ours gets around 10%, low enough to tell them to take their ridiculous demands elsewhere and shove them.

Yeah cause they're workbooks. Like the kind of workbooks we did in the 70s and 80s that parents who are not teachers think work great, cause we did them in the 70s and 80s.

Then these parents think, "hey I went to public school and hated it..." but they somehow think using the VERY SAME METHODS they did is a win.

you know. I just shake my head.

Actually when I went to school it was only a supplement to what I had to learn at home; we were reading before we got sent to first grade. School is where we learned Greek and Roman prefixes and suffixes and their meanings, so that reading later was a lot easier when you could look at 'big words' and generally guess what they meant before looking them up, and we used a lot of those boring memorization techniques; none of my teachers or my parents felt they had some sort of duty to entertain us and that we had to like anything.