Hypocrites have little standing to condemn others. Now if it's acceptable to elect someone that is a poor moral example, it's OK for others also so the point here is moot.
I truly wished, in 2016, that there was a plausible Presidential candidate to support, who was of better moral character than what was offered. As bad as Trump is, the alternative was a woman who has willfully, knowingly been an accessory to multiple instances of violent sexual abuse against women, perpetrated by the subhuman piece of shit to whom she is married, as well as many other acts of horrendous corruption and abuse of power.
Sometimes the devil you do not know (or at least not very well) is preferable to the devil that you do know.
I still wish that we had a President who would set a good moral example, but that just was not going to happen this time around. At least we got a rare example of a political leader who clearly is putting the interests of the nation that he was elected to lead above that of his own greed and desire for power.
And although he is not a good moral example himself, he is, at least, unlike the Democraps, not hostile to morality. He doesn't support the cold-blooded murder of innocent children, a most Democraps do, and he doesn't support forcing immoral and insane sexual perversions on decent society, as most Democraps do.
Yes, he's a flaming hypocrite, and that is a significant fault in him.
But I wonder if that's really as bad as we think it is.
Would you give credence to a drug addict, advising you not to do drugs? I don't know that this principle applies necessarily to Mr. Trump, but I think that sometimes, one who has fallen into bad behavior may actually be in a better position to wish to discourage others from making the same mistakes.