From the article…
What does this study not show?
This research only looked at the spike protein found on virus cells. There is no evidence to suggest that spike proteins generated by the vaccine behave in a similar way.
What can we do to avoid heart damage from Covid-19?
The best way to reduce your risk of severe Covid-19 infection is to follow the current health advice where you live – including getting vaccinated if you’re eligible.
Being fully vaccinated against Covid-19 means that your immune system will rapidly produce antibodies against the spike protein if it encounters the virus. These antibodies will work to neutralise any circulating spike protein.
The first point that I quoted is rather damning, to the credibility of the entire article, and perhaps to the study on which it is reporting.
The claim is that these spike proteins cause this harm, when carried into the system as part of a virus. It admits that the effect of the same spike protein, when generated by the dangerous experimental mRNA
“vaccines” was not studied, and goes on to presume that there is no evidence that these same proteins, introduced in that manner, would cause the same harm.
Well, of course there's
“no evidence”, if no attempt was made to look for it. There's also no evidence to the contrary; and lacking solid evidence either way, it seems to me that the presumption that this same protein will not cause the same or similar harm when it is produced by the mRNA shit as it causes when introduced as part of a virus seems extremely dubious.
If a study determines that drinking orange juice mixed with cyanide will kill you, would it make sense to assume, lacking any specific study on that matter, that it is safe to drink cola with cyanide mixed into it?
I do not know how accurately this article reflects the actual study, but from the way the article is written, it is quite obvious that the author started with the presumption that it is a good idea to accept these dangerous experimental mRNA-based drugs, and attempted (very poorly) to cherry-pick and distort available evidence to support this premise.