Bribery is a loser

[Slade3200]

LOLOL

Those are Glenn Beck videos, not documents.

that include links to documents

You’re too lazy to post the links and then tie the documents to support your argument. You saw a clip of a 2 hour video and are throwing on here acting like it’s proving your point. That’s a pretty pathetic way to debate. #fail

what you want me to do is already done in the videos far better than I could do it,,,

I want you to make concise points regarding the topic at hand and then back them up without dodging it for 30 pages. Posting a 2 hour video and saying the proof is in there somewhere is a lazy way to debate. You fail. Do better

I want you to watch the video,,,

I know you do

 

[progressive hunter]

thats simple,,,you go off the facts and leave the emotions at home,,,

excellent suggestion. Post your facts then. Let’s see the documentation you say you have

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

I dont see where your opinion of beck has anything to do with the evidence presented,,,

There was no evidence presented that proves the point you were trying to make. You failed

DID you watch it???

 

[Slade3200]

excellent suggestion. Post your facts then. Let’s see the documentation you say you have

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

if you watched the latest then you would know its the state dept funding soros,,,Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

all I am trying to do is help you with your ignorance,,,

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

 

[mudwhistle]

They can't quit.

They're the kamikaze pilot who is already in the dive on the target, with the entire plane in flames.....They're going to completely disintegrate and die, in the name of The Party.

Maybe Hillary has some sake in her stash for them.

Now it's witness intimidation....

 

[progressive hunter]

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

if you watched the latest then you would know its the state dept funding soros,,,Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

all I am trying to do is help you with your ignorance,,,

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

 

[Slade3200]

excellent suggestion. Post your facts then. Let’s see the documentation you say you have

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

I dont see where your opinion of beck has anything to do with the evidence presented,,,

There was no evidence presented that proves the point you were trying to make. You failed

DID you watch it???

I skimmed it. I don’t respect you enough to waste two hours on your recommendation. If you didn’t troll so much and could actually carry on an intellectual conversation then that might be different but that’s just not the case.

 

[Slade3200]

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

if you watched the latest then you would know its the state dept funding soros,,,Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

all I am trying to do is help you with your ignorance,,,

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

 

[progressive hunter]

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

I dont see where your opinion of beck has anything to do with the evidence presented,,,

There was no evidence presented that proves the point you were trying to make. You failed

DID you watch it???

I skimmed it. I don’t respect you enough to waste two hours on your recommendation. If you didn’t troll so much and could actually carry on an intellectual conversation then that might be different but that’s just not the case.

the lack of intelligence is clearly on your side,,, heck you even admit to it

 

[progressive hunter]

if you watched the latest then you would know its the state dept funding soros,,,Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

all I am trying to do is help you with your ignorance,,,

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

 

[Faun]

excellent suggestion. Post your facts then. Let’s see the documentation you say you have

I just posted them a few minutes ago,,,you were crying pretty hard

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

wouldnt want you to spend your whole life an ignorant moron

included in these are all the links to the documents I was talking about,,,

ive seen the Beck videos and I also listen to his radio show which is way tamer. This actually explains a lot about you. You are very gullible.

Entertaining notion that Soros is funding a deep state conspiracy aimed at controlling the people through illegal surveillance and a shadow court system. But like your weak arguments there just aren’t any facts to back it all up. It’s all hyperbole and spun up narratives based on suspicions not hard evidence. More importantly there were no documents shown proving that there is a legitimate investigation into Biden corruption in Ukraine. That was the topic. You failed to support your argument. Thanks for the rabbit hole though. You lose.

if you watched the latest then you would know its the state dept funding soros,,,Secretary Clinton Announces Civil Society 2.0 Initiative to Build Capacity of Grassroots Organizations

all I am trying to do is help you with your ignorance,,,

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

"your to ******* stupid..."

 

[Olde Europe]

i literally just said all that

No, you did not. Had you read my text closely enough you would have realized I amended your text in several places to demonstrate how you fall short of including several crucial pieces of evidence. But you didn't. And so you still can't quite understand the difference.

The task at hand is not to demonstrate to every bonehead and benighted Trumpleton that Trump's action was corrupt. Demonstrating it so that every reasonable citizen can understand it has to suffice. That is already accomplished. Now we're waiting whether you jump on board or not.

 

[Slade3200]

Holy shit!! Clinton initiates a campaign to help grass root organiazations learn how to build websites, work with government and market their causes?! The horror!!!!! The whore!!! This is crazy I can’t can’t believe our world hasn’t imploded yet! Get out of here man, your arguments are a joke

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

That’s a cheap shot and not even true. My emotions are a non factor. I’m looking for facts. You can’t provide them. Ok I’m done with this nonsense now... you’ve wasted enough of my time. If you have something smart to say then say it otherwise I’m done with you

 

[Slade3200]

i literally just said all that

No, you did not. Had you read my text closely enough you would have realized I amended your text in several places to demonstrate how you fall short of including several crucial pieces of evidence. But you didn't. And so you still can't quite understand the difference.

The task at hand is not to demonstrate to every bonehead and benighted Trumpleton that Trump's action was corrupt. Demonstrating it so that every reasonable citizen can understand it has to suffice. That is already accomplished. Now we're waiting whether you jump on board or not.

I understand the difference and I noted the differences. My point is that the argument is a losing one. You need consensus from the public to impeach and you aren’t going to get there with bribery. If you don’t get there and try to impeach then trump wins the next election

 

[progressive hunter]

your to ******* stupid to know that a government doesnt start grass roots uprising,,, thats called astroturf,,,
and its clear you just went off the headline and didnt educate yourself on all the facts,,,AGAIN,,,

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

That’s a cheap shot and not even true. My emotions are a non factor. I’m looking for facts. You can’t provide them. Ok I’m done with this nonsense now... you’ve wasted enough of my time. If you have something smart to say then say it otherwise I’m done with you

you dont like beck so you ignore the evidence he presents,,,

thats pure emotion not rational thought,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

what a

i literally just said all that

No, you did not. Had you read my text closely enough you would have realized I amended your text in several places to demonstrate how you fall short of including several crucial pieces of evidence. But you didn't. And so you still can't quite understand the difference.

The task at hand is not to demonstrate to every bonehead and benighted Trumpleton that Trump's action was corrupt. Demonstrating it so that every reasonable citizen can understand it has to suffice. That is already accomplished. Now we're waiting whether you jump on board or not.

I understand the difference and I noted the differences. My point is that the argument is a losing one. You need consensus from the public to impeach and you aren’t going to get there with bribery. If you don’t get there and try to impeach then trump wins the next election

what an idiot,,, you need proof of a crime to impeach not a consensus,,,

consensus is based on emotions not rational thought

 

[Slade3200]

No shit and if you had a brain you’d see that Clinton’s initiative wasn’t starting orgs. They were providing tech and operational support.

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

That’s a cheap shot and not even true. My emotions are a non factor. I’m looking for facts. You can’t provide them. Ok I’m done with this nonsense now... you’ve wasted enough of my time. If you have something smart to say then say it otherwise I’m done with you

you dont like beck so you ignore the evidence he presents,,,

thats pure emotion not rational thought,,,

i like beck and I listen to Beck as I said previously. I just don’t blindly believe everything he says. There’s a ton of conjecture in there

 

[Slade3200]

what a

i literally just said all that

No, you did not. Had you read my text closely enough you would have realized I amended your text in several places to demonstrate how you fall short of including several crucial pieces of evidence. But you didn't. And so you still can't quite understand the difference.

The task at hand is not to demonstrate to every bonehead and benighted Trumpleton that Trump's action was corrupt. Demonstrating it so that every reasonable citizen can understand it has to suffice. That is already accomplished. Now we're waiting whether you jump on board or not.

I understand the difference and I noted the differences. My point is that the argument is a losing one. You need consensus from the public to impeach and you aren’t going to get there with bribery. If you don’t get there and try to impeach then trump wins the next election

what an idiot,,, you need proof of a crime to impeach not a consensus,,,

consensus is based on emotions not rational thought

i don’t support impeachment dumbass. Go away now you’re lost and confused and a waste of time.

 

[progressive hunter]

still proves my point,,,

this is one you need to keep reading up on,, cause its a huge problem for this country,,,

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

That’s a cheap shot and not even true. My emotions are a non factor. I’m looking for facts. You can’t provide them. Ok I’m done with this nonsense now... you’ve wasted enough of my time. If you have something smart to say then say it otherwise I’m done with you

you dont like beck so you ignore the evidence he presents,,,

thats pure emotion not rational thought,,,

i like beck and I listen to Beck as I said previously. I just don’t blindly believe everything he says. There’s a ton of conjecture in there

not when its backed up by documents and first hand testimony,,which is the case here,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

what a

i literally just said all that

No, you did not. Had you read my text closely enough you would have realized I amended your text in several places to demonstrate how you fall short of including several crucial pieces of evidence. But you didn't. And so you still can't quite understand the difference.

The task at hand is not to demonstrate to every bonehead and benighted Trumpleton that Trump's action was corrupt. Demonstrating it so that every reasonable citizen can understand it has to suffice. That is already accomplished. Now we're waiting whether you jump on board or not.

I understand the difference and I noted the differences. My point is that the argument is a losing one. You need consensus from the public to impeach and you aren’t going to get there with bribery. If you don’t get there and try to impeach then trump wins the next election

what an idiot,,, you need proof of a crime to impeach not a consensus,,,

consensus is based on emotions not rational thought

i don’t support impeachment dumbass. Go away now you’re lost and confused and a waste of time.

I never said you did,,,

 

[Slade3200]

the point that was just proven was the fact that you don't know how to accurately present information. Do better

the real problem is you dont know how to assimilate it,,,and let your emotions control you,,,

That’s a cheap shot and not even true. My emotions are a non factor. I’m looking for facts. You can’t provide them. Ok I’m done with this nonsense now... you’ve wasted enough of my time. If you have something smart to say then say it otherwise I’m done with you

you dont like beck so you ignore the evidence he presents,,,

thats pure emotion not rational thought,,,

i like beck and I listen to Beck as I said previously. I just don’t blindly believe everything he says. There’s a ton of conjecture in there

not when its backed up by documents and first hand testimony,,which is the case here,,,

It most certainly is not. The fact that you can’t point to the actual evidence and can only post a 2 hour video shows the flaw in your argument and your lack of intelligence