Ruby Wrote:
The reason that women politicized it was because many women who were discreetly breast-feeding their babies were harrassed and thrown out of establishments. There has only been one way to change things, to go public and make it a very public issue so that we could change things.
Using our breasts in a sexual manner has not ever been much of a complaint but when women were using breasts to feed babies they were harrassed.
And I think that most here would agree with you that no woman who is discreetly breast-feeding her child should be harassed by a stranger because she has needed to breast-feed in public.
In that case, I do think that fighting for a right to breast-feed is the right thing to do..again, I think that most people here agree with you.
What people who are asking for discretion on both sides are looking for from you and others...is agreement that breast-feeding in public is something that can be done discreetly and with respect for all involved (the mother, the baby, and...because you have chosen to breast-feed in public...the public is now part of the equation).
We keep saying that all we want is for a woman who is feeding her child discreetly and respectfully to be left alone and treated with respect. We agree that women who are harassed while doing that should make sure that the law is on their side.
But we are also saying that women who choose to make a political issue out of breastfeeding by harassing those around her with very obvious, indiscreet breastfeeding for no other reason than to make other people uncomfortable (and while most women who breastfeed discreetly...most people here who are arguing this point have at least one story, if not more, of a woman doing just this...so it happens too) is just as wrong as the person harassing the mother who is feeding her child as privately as possible given the location.
I don't think that the way to win a political argument such as this one is to go from one end of the spectrum to the other...a woman who is harassed while being discreet should not, in my opinion, fire back by walking into a food court, unbuttoning her top, and start feeding her child with one breast while the other is prominently out for every 14-year-old boy in the food court at a huge mall to see (something I witnessed in Towson, MD).
When a security guard quietly and very politely (I was within hearing range) asked her to cover her other breast...she SCREAMED that the law was on her side and that "IF YOU CONSERVATIVE PRUDES CAN'T HANDLE A BOOBIE THAT WASN'T BEING FLASHED BY AN 18 YEAR OLD IN A BIKINI THEN THATS YOUR PROBLEM, NOT MINE, NOW FUCK OFF, YOU PERVERT BEFORE I CALL A REAL COP!"
This woman, in my opinion, was obviously using her child to stage her political point -that she should be able to do whatever she wanted and everyone else around her be damned. And you know what, shes right, the law might have been on her side, but that doesn't mean her behavior was right, appropriate, or respectful...
And THAT is really what I think many people here are asking you and others to recognize...that just as it is not right, appropriate or respectful to approach a woman discreetly (or trying to be discreet and accidentally her breasts come into view momentarily) breast-feeding her child and give her a hard time...it is NOT right to use your child and your body to breastfeed obviously and graphically for no other purpose than to make other people feel uncomfortable in public spaces. The law might be on the mothers side....that doesn't mean its right for a woman to act this way.
Thats the kind of behavior we are now asking you, Ruby and others, to condemn, just as we have condemned idiots who approach women and harass them when they are being polite and respectful of others.