Breaking: Trump Hits Sessions, Hillary, And Acting FBI Head McCabe In Epic Tuesday Morning Tweets

[OldLady]

Trump knows the Senate would not be happy with him and the Senate would be forced to do their job and only give advise and consent for a nominee that will not fire Mueller....

1. So the President plans to do a recess appointment when congress and the senate goes home for the summer, to slip in an attorney general who will be there for the next two years, that is a Trump crony, or who works for the Mob Boss, Trump.

2. Heaven help us!

Hmmmmm, I guess he learned that trick from Obama and Bush. Your outrage only shows your ignorance.

There were reasons why both bush and Obama tried and sometimes did use recess appointments...both went months and months and months and a few cases over a year, with the Senate not even putting up their nominees for a vote....

What President Trump is doing, is criminal in nature...he is trying to stop an official criminal investigation in to himself, his family and his Trump campaign team.

That should NOT be taken lightly!

The President would be obstructing Justice to the nth degree...

A complete GROSS USE OF POWER is going on here...

Fire or force Sessions to resign, replace him with an Attorney General that is Trump's 'patsy' during recess that will do Trump's will and fire Mueller, and his 'patsy' will NOT follow the rule of Law by serving the Constitution first, but by serving the President first, over and above Justice, and also, this Attorney General of the United States of America 'patsy' will kill the investigation on the Trump team and Russia.

And God willing, crooked Trump will be impeached and removed for his obstruction of Justice, abuse of Power, and failure to execute his duties as President of the USA.

you don't like Trump, I get it. The rest of your post is a pile of steaming bullshit.

So what do you disagree with in the rest of my post?

That once Sessions is gone, Trump will recess appoint a new attorney general of the USA part?

Or that the 'patsy' will fire Mueller for him?

Or that he will kill the investigation for Trump on the Trump team, family and himself and the Russian Interference in our election part?

Care4All, if all that happens, we may need to grab our pitchforks and oak staves and march to Boston.

 

[Redfish]

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

 

[TNHarley]

Trump knows the Senate would not be happy with him and the Senate would be forced to do their job and only give advise and consent for a nominee that will not fire Mueller....

1. So the President plans to do a recess appointment when congress and the senate goes home for the summer, to slip in an attorney general who will be there for the next two years, that is a Trump crony, or who works for the Mob Boss, Trump.

2. Heaven help us!

Hmmmmm, I guess he learned that trick from Obama and Bush. Your outrage only shows your ignorance.

There were reasons why both bush and Obama tried and sometimes did use recess appointments...both went months and months and months and a few cases over a year, with the Senate not even putting up their nominees for a vote....

What President Trump is doing, is criminal in nature...he is trying to stop an official criminal investigation in to himself, his family and his Trump campaign team.

That should NOT be taken lightly!

The President would be obstructing Justice to the nth degree...

A complete GROSS USE OF POWER is going on here...

Fire or force Sessions to resign, replace him with an Attorney General that is Trump's 'patsy' during recess that will do Trump's will and fire Mueller, and his 'patsy' will NOT follow the rule of Law by serving the Constitution first, but by serving the President first, over and above Justice, and also, this Attorney General of the United States of America 'patsy' will kill the investigation on the Trump team and Russia.

And God willing, crooked Trump will be impeached and removed for his obstruction of Justice, abuse of Power, and failure to execute his duties as President of the USA.

you don't like Trump, I get it. The rest of your post is a pile of steaming bullshit.

So what do you disagree with in the rest of my post?

That once Sessions is gone, Trump will recess appoint a new attorney general of the USA part?

Or that the 'patsy' will fire Mueller for him?

Or that he will kill the investigation for Trump on the Trump team, family and himself and the Russian Interference in our election part?

Care4All, if all that happens, we may need to grab our pitchforks and oak staves and march to Boston.

After all the shit the govt puts us through, and that will make you grab the pitchforks? Lol well..

 

[Redfish]

Trump knows the Senate would not be happy with him and the Senate would be forced to do their job and only give advise and consent for a nominee that will not fire Mueller....

1. So the President plans to do a recess appointment when congress and the senate goes home for the summer, to slip in an attorney general who will be there for the next two years, that is a Trump crony, or who works for the Mob Boss, Trump.

2. Heaven help us!

Hmmmmm, I guess he learned that trick from Obama and Bush. Your outrage only shows your ignorance.

There were reasons why both bush and Obama tried and sometimes did use recess appointments...both went months and months and months and a few cases over a year, with the Senate not even putting up their nominees for a vote....

What President Trump is doing, is criminal in nature...he is trying to stop an official criminal investigation in to himself, his family and his Trump campaign team.

That should NOT be taken lightly!

The President would be obstructing Justice to the nth degree...

A complete GROSS USE OF POWER is going on here...

Fire or force Sessions to resign, replace him with an Attorney General that is Trump's 'patsy' during recess that will do Trump's will and fire Mueller, and his 'patsy' will NOT follow the rule of Law by serving the Constitution first, but by serving the President first, over and above Justice, and also, this Attorney General of the United States of America 'patsy' will kill the investigation on the Trump team and Russia.

And God willing, crooked Trump will be impeached and removed for his obstruction of Justice, abuse of Power, and failure to execute his duties as President of the USA.

you don't like Trump, I get it. The rest of your post is a pile of steaming bullshit.

So what do you disagree with in the rest of my post?

That once Sessions is gone, Trump will recess appoint a new attorney general of the USA part?

Or that the 'patsy' will fire Mueller for him?

Or that he will kill the investigation for Trump on the Trump team, family and himself and the Russian Interference in our election part?

Care4All, if all that happens, we may need to grab our pitchforks and oak staves and march to Boston.

your people are already doing that in Berkley. Destroying public and private property in order to silence the truth. Its very sad to see what the party of Kennedy and Truman has become.

 

[Care4all]

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

 

[OldLady]

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?

Where did I say leakers were okay? I believe you said that.

 

[OldLady]

Hmmmmm, I guess he learned that trick from Obama and Bush. Your outrage only shows your ignorance.

There were reasons why both bush and Obama tried and sometimes did use recess appointments...both went months and months and months and a few cases over a year, with the Senate not even putting up their nominees for a vote....

What President Trump is doing, is criminal in nature...he is trying to stop an official criminal investigation in to himself, his family and his Trump campaign team.

That should NOT be taken lightly!

The President would be obstructing Justice to the nth degree...

A complete GROSS USE OF POWER is going on here...

Fire or force Sessions to resign, replace him with an Attorney General that is Trump's 'patsy' during recess that will do Trump's will and fire Mueller, and his 'patsy' will NOT follow the rule of Law by serving the Constitution first, but by serving the President first, over and above Justice, and also, this Attorney General of the United States of America 'patsy' will kill the investigation on the Trump team and Russia.

And God willing, crooked Trump will be impeached and removed for his obstruction of Justice, abuse of Power, and failure to execute his duties as President of the USA.

you don't like Trump, I get it. The rest of your post is a pile of steaming bullshit.

So what do you disagree with in the rest of my post?

That once Sessions is gone, Trump will recess appoint a new attorney general of the USA part?

Or that the 'patsy' will fire Mueller for him?

Or that he will kill the investigation for Trump on the Trump team, family and himself and the Russian Interference in our election part?

Care4All, if all that happens, we may need to grab our pitchforks and oak staves and march to Boston.

your people are already doing that in Berkley. Destroying public and private property in order to silence the truth. Its very sad to see what the party of Kennedy and Truman has become.

"My" people aren't doing any such thing. I have no affinity with Antifa.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

Mueller should have picked neutral lawyers who haven't donated to any candidate. Wouldn't you agree?

 

[OldLady]

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.
What have they done to lead you to that conclusion? Things they have actually done, please.

 

[TNHarley]

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?

Where did I say leakers were okay? I believe you said that.

I asked if you hated leakers and your response was "I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote." What else what i suppose to think?
When you answer a yes or no question with a statement, one believes you have stipulations. That isnt my fault. It is your communication

 

[Care4all]

It's an absolute disgrace what Trump and his bots are doing to this Nation and the Rule of Law/Justice,

Telling Americans that ALL OF OUR U.S. PROSECUTORS, INVESTIGATE and prosecute cases differently depending on what Party affiliation the accused is.... what bull crap!

 

[OldLady]

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

Mueller should have picked neutral lawyers who haven't donated to any candidate. Wouldn't you agree?

NO!
Who we support in a free election is no one's business. These are professionals who will work within the parameters of the law. Just because some of Trump's supporters are so partisan that they couldn't put aside their opinions to perform their jobs doesn't mean that there aren't principled professionals out there who can.

 

[OldLady]

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?

Where did I say leakers were okay? I believe you said that.

I asked if you hated leakers and your response was "I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote." What else what i suppose to think?
When you answer a yes or no question with a statement, one believes you have stipulations. That isnt my fault. It is your communication

When one doesn't answer a question, you make up an answer, is what it sounds like to me. Not a fair tactic.

 

[Slyhunter]

Time to replace Sessions. I like Trey Dowdy.

 

[TNHarley]

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?

Where did I say leakers were okay? I believe you said that.

I asked if you hated leakers and your response was "I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote." What else what i suppose to think?
When you answer a yes or no question with a statement, one believes you have stipulations. That isnt my fault. It is your communication

When one doesn't answer a question, you make up an answer, is what it sounds like to me. Not a fair tactic.

I asked you a yes or no question and you responded with a full statement. Dont you teach English? Is communication involved in any of that?
Just forget it. Answer the yes or no question with a yes or no to AVOID any communication errors. TIA
Do you like leakers?

 

[OldLady]

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?

Where did I say leakers were okay? I believe you said that.

I asked if you hated leakers and your response was "I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote." What else what i suppose to think?
When you answer a yes or no question with a statement, one believes you have stipulations. That isnt my fault. It is your communication

When one doesn't answer a question, you make up an answer, is what it sounds like to me. Not a fair tactic.

I asked you a yes or no question and you responded with a full statement. Dont you teach English? Is communication involved in any of that?
Just forget it. Answer the yes or no question with a yes or no to AVOID any communication errors. TIA
Do you like leakers?

No. I like to know where my information is coming from, and "anonymous sources" are iffy. Why do you ask?

 

[Care4all]

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

Mueller should have picked neutral lawyers who haven't donated to any candidate. Wouldn't you agree?

No I do not agree because all prosecutors and every citizen has the right to free speech(donating) and a right to support the candidate of their choice.

These are professionals and what party they voted for would have nothing at all to do with how and what they investigate that their investigation leads them to...they are not on this witch hunt, they are simply tasked with finding out the truth....and whether any criminal acts occurred or not.

Why would ones party affiliation get in the way of that task?

 

[Redfish]

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

Are you so naïve that you don't know that the USA has been trying to influence elections in other countries since 1776? This is nothing new. Obama spent millions of US dollars in a failed effort to beat Netanyahu in Israel.

There is also no proof that the data leaked by wikileaks came from Russia. It may have come from a disgruntled Bernie supporter in the DNC.

and for the final time, why is it bad for the voters to have access to the truth about the candidates, regardless of where that truth comes from?

last question: why would Russia prefer Trump over Clinton when they had reams of data that could be used to blackmail her?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

Mueller should have picked neutral lawyers who haven't donated to any candidate. Wouldn't you agree?

These are professionals and what party they voted for would have nothing at all to do with how and what they investigate that their investigation leads them to...they are not on this witch hunt, they are simply tasked with finding out the truth....and whether any criminal acts occurred or not.

Why would ones party affiliation get in the way of that task?

You are quite naive in your thinking. These are not professionals, they are corrupt unethical professionals who subvert the law when they see fit.

 

[Redfish]

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

nice sentiments. But Mueller and his band of democrat lawyers are not looking for the truth. They are on a witch hunt to try to bring Trump down.

What the dems are really scared of is that Trump is succeeding just as he promised during the campaign. They cannot attack him of what he is doing for the country, so they have to revert to their typical strategy or personal destruction.

That, Mary Poppins is what is really going on here.

7 out of the 15 man lawyer investigation team, have donated to Democrats, the other 8, have not. That's not unbalanced...

oh and Trump donated campaign funds to just Hillary (let alone all Democrats), MORE than all these 7 lawyers combined....why's it ok with Trump donating to Democrats in the past and not them?

Mueller should have picked neutral lawyers who haven't donated to any candidate. Wouldn't you agree?

No I do not agree because all prosecutors and every citizen has the right to free speech(donating) and a right to support the candidate of their choice.

These are professionals and what party they voted for would have nothing at all to do with how and what they investigate that their investigation leads them to...they are not on this witch hunt, they are simply tasked with finding out the truth....and whether any criminal acts occurred or not.

Why would ones party affiliation get in the way of that task?

your lack of historical knowledge on display. If you don't think the Mueller team is party driven, you are amazingly naïve.