Breaking: Trump Hits Sessions, Hillary, And Acting FBI Head McCabe In Epic Tuesday Morning Tweets

[Redfish]

If Hillary or Bill Clinton would have tried these kind of criminal tactics that Trump is doing, they would have been accused of treason or traitors and Hung by the Highest Tree, and crucified thru public opinion, with both Dems and Repubs supporting such.

what criminal acts? be specific. Which laws have been broken, be specific.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

If Hillary or Bill Clinton would have tried these kind of criminal tactics that Trump is doing, they would have been accused of treason or traitors and Hung by the Highest Tree, and crucified thru public opinion, with both Dems and Repubs supporting such.

One day you'll find out what kind of criminal tactics the Clinton's used and how they got away with murder - quite literally. It ought to be quite a revelation for some. But most of America already knows these people are criminals. It's not difficult to see when you consider how they operate.

 

[Nia88]

You Trumpsters are gullible. Trump doesn't want to get rid of Sessions because he wants Hilary to be charged. He's mad because Sessions( one of his many loyal subjects ) isn't overseeing the Russian investigation. He's furious Mueller is actually doing his job.

Sessions was right to recuse himself. There was doubt he could be objective so to ensure a fair investigation he recused himself. That slimy Sessions was actually right in this case.

 

[Redfish]

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Ok, the third. Out of how many? batting at 10% is still pretty crappy.

Well, we have to follow the law and provide enough hard evidence to bring indictments. Government officials are pretty crafty and have means to protect themselves. This is true. But it doesn't mean you give up or that you ignore the efforts to hold even our highest officials accountable.

does that apply to the Clintons, the Clinton foundation, Pelosi, Schumer, Reid, et al?

Maxine Waters lives in a 4.3 million mansion. How does she afford that on a congressman's salary? Should that be investigated?

 

[TNHarley]

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

Then why did they want them?
FBI says DNC rebuffed request to examine computer servers - CNNPolitics.com
I know this could be fake news, so sorry about that
"The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated," a senior law enforcement official told CNN. "This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier."
Yes, all the info they need from a THIRD PARTY

 

[Care4all]

The MOB, we've got Don Corleone running the Country!

 

[TNHarley]

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Ok, the third. Out of how many? batting at 10% is still pretty crappy.

Well, we have to follow the law and provide enough hard evidence to bring indictments. Government officials are pretty crafty and have means to protect themselves. This is true. But it doesn't mean you give up or that you ignore the efforts to hold even our highest officials accountable.

ORRRRRRRRRR they dont even try

 

[OldLady]

I'm not liking the tone of this. Maybe the jackass WILL work himself up to fire Sessions in order to get to Mueller. He seems to be setting up his excuses.
This will backfire, buddy. Or it had better backfire, if this is still the United States of America.

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

 

[Redfish]

Yes, because govt accountability is an American tradition

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

 

[OldLady]

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Ok, the third. Out of how many? batting at 10% is still pretty crappy.

Well, we have to follow the law and provide enough hard evidence to bring indictments. Government officials are pretty crafty and have means to protect themselves. This is true. But it doesn't mean you give up or that you ignore the efforts to hold even our highest officials accountable.

does that apply to the Clintons, the Clinton foundation, Pelosi, Schumer, Reid, et al?

Maxine Waters lives in a 4.3 million mansion. How does she afford that on a congressman's salary? Should that be investigated?

Yes and Susan Rice received 50 million dollars for what? Seth Rich said follow the money. You can be sure Trump investigators are doing just that.

 

[TNHarley]

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

Mueller is not serving the interests of the USA, he is serving the far left wing of the dem party. He should be fired.

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

 

[Redfish]

The MOB, we've got Don Corleone running the Country!

wrong, that would have been "Donna Corleone" if the hildebeast had won. Thank God that she is not in the oval office. If that bitch had won, the USA would be over.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

It's nothing but a diversion. The real story is coming out on Twitter. Can't wait to see what President Trump is tweeting 2 weeks from now.

 

[OldLady]

So if Trump fires Mueller, you predict he will be allowed to continue on his way with no repercussions?

No. Trump could very well be the first to be held accountable. Wouldnt surprise me a BIT.
I was just laughing at "if this is still" etc lol

Nixon and Bill Clinton were held accountable. There was an Iran Contra investigation that didn't turn out so hot either. Trump would not be the first.

Nixon was not held accountable, he resigned in the best interests of the country

Clinton was not held accountable, accountability would have resulted in removal from office for lying under oath.

Iran/contra was a CIA operation that went bad. Reagan took responsibility, as he should have.

your revisionist history is typical of brainwashed liberals.

My point was, Nixon got busted and resigned to avoid impeachment and no doubt arrest. Ford had to pardon him, so he must have been facing SOMETHING. Clinton was impeached and allowed to remain in office. Reagan took responsibility for the Iran Contra deal because he was neck deep in it. The point is, they were held accountable in MY BOOK. I don't care if they went to jail and I have no desire to see Trump in jail, either. Just getting it on the record that they did wrong and got caught is enough. If for the best interests of the country, the leader remains, so be it.

your problem is that you are a victim of the left wing media. You, and they, assume that Trump is guilty of something because that's what you want to believe. You probably also assume that OJ is innocent because you just like him and want him to be freeeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Why don't you libs want to deal with actual evidence? I will never understand the liberal mind.

Nope, not that you'll remember this, but I'm not hoping he's guilty of something; I don't believe he's guilty of something. I'm waiting for the investigations to conclude and see what the people who ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON have to say. There have been so many classified meetings and so much classified information given to the investigators that we know nothing about that it is crazy for any of us to be jumping to conclusions.

 

[Redfish]

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

she only hates leakers that leak the truth about democrats. other leakers are wonderful

 

[OldLady]

If only the far left wing of the Democratic Party gives a shit that Russians hacked into our private election business and broadcast it to Wikileaks to undermine the Democratic candidate, and if only far left wing Democrats want to know if Americans on the Trump campaign were aware of that help and advanced those efforts, then GOOD. We'll take it.
By the way, Mueller is a Republican.

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

 

[Care4all]

Trump knows the Senate would not be happy with him and the Senate would be forced to do their job and only give advise and consent for a nominee that will not fire Mueller....

1. So the President plans to do a recess appointment when congress and the senate goes home for the summer, to slip in an attorney general who will be there for the next two years, that is a Trump crony, or who works for the Mob Boss, Trump.

2. Heaven help us!

Hmmmmm, I guess he learned that trick from Obama and Bush. Your outrage only shows your ignorance.

There were reasons why both bush and Obama tried and sometimes did use recess appointments...both went months and months and months and a few cases over a year, with the Senate not even putting up their nominees for a vote....

What President Trump is doing, is criminal in nature...he is trying to stop an official criminal investigation in to himself, his family and his Trump campaign team.

That should NOT be taken lightly!

The President would be obstructing Justice to the nth degree...

A complete GROSS USE OF POWER is going on here...

Fire or force Sessions to resign, replace him with an Attorney General that is Trump's 'patsy' during recess that will do Trump's will and fire Mueller, and his 'patsy' will NOT follow the rule of Law by serving the Constitution first, but by serving the President first, over and above Justice, and also, this Attorney General of the United States of America 'patsy' will kill the investigation on the Trump team and Russia.

And God willing, crooked Trump will be impeached and removed for his obstruction of Justice, abuse of Power, and failure to execute his duties as President of the USA.

you don't like Trump, I get it. The rest of your post is a pile of steaming bullshit.

So what do you disagree with in the rest of my post?

That once Sessions is gone, Trump will recess appoint a new attorney general of the USA part?

Or that the 'patsy' will fire Mueller for him?

Or that he will kill the investigation for Trump on the Trump team, family and himself and the Russian Interference in our election part?

 

[OldLady]

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

she only hates leakers that leak the truth about democrats. other leakers are wonderful

speak for yourself.

 

[TNHarley]

If the Dem party cared, why didnt they turn in their servers?

TN, this is serious. We got the information we needed in spite of the fact that they didn't want to hand over their servers in the midst of their busiest campaign season.
That is not an argument.

one more time. What you are actually saying is that the truth about Hillary, the DNC, and the media MAY have cost her the election. Now, why is that bad for the USA?

An adversarial foreign power stole stuff out of our file cabinets and broadcast them with ill intent. If I have to explain why that's bad for the USA, there's something wrong with you.

so you hate leakers? Why?

I hate adversarial foreign powers trying to influence our vote.

But coming from within is ok? Lol well..
Does that mean that if all this ended up coming form seth rich, you would be ok with the leaks, then?